[lac-discuss-en] VOTE NOTICE: 2015 VOTE FOR REPRESENTATIVE LACRALO ALAC / 2015 VOTE FOR REPRESENTATIVE TO THE LACRALO ALAC
Humberto Carrasco
hcarrascob at gmail.com
Thu Sep 10 12:20:32 UTC 2015
Mr. Samuels,
To further clarify our position, we want to explain the nature of what
is a point of order.
The UNGA Rules of Procedure, in particular, Article 79 of Annex IV (a)
of the Rules of the General Assembly, gives a concept of what a point of
order:
79. The Special Committee recommends to the General Assembly the
adoption of the following text as a description of the concept of a
point of order [para. 229]:
*_"(a) A point of order is basically an intervention directed to the
presiding officer, requesting him to make use of some power inherent in
his office or specifically given him under the rules of procedure_*. It
may, for example, relate to the manner in which the debate is conducted,
to the maintenance of order, to the observance of the rules of procedure
or to the way in which presiding officers exercise the powers conferred
upon them by the rules. Under a point of order, a representative may
request the presiding officer to apply a certain rule of procedure or he
may question the way in which the officer applies the rule. Thus, within
the scope of the rules of procedure, representatives are enabled to
direct the attention of the presiding officer to violations or
misapplications of the rules by other representatives or by the
presiding officer himself. A point of order has precedence over any
other matter, including procedural motions (rules 73 [114] [Rule 71
[113] of the present rules of procedure] and 79 [120] [Rule 77 [119] of
the present rules of procedure]).
"(b) Points of order raised under rule 73 [114]n involve questions
necessitating a ruling by the presiding officer, subject to possible
appeal. *They are therefore distinct from the procedural motions
provided for in rules 76*[117] [Rule 74 [116] of the present rules of
procedure] to 79 [120]o which can be decided only by a vote and on which
more than one motion may be entertained at the same time, rule 79 [120]o
laying down the precedence of such motions. *_They are also distinct
from requests for information or clarification, or from remarks relating
to material arrangements (seating, interpretation system, temperature of
the room), documents, translations, etc., which - while they may have to
be dealt with by the presiding officer - do not require rulings from
him. However, in established United Nations practice, a representative
intending to submit a procedural motion or to seek information or
clarification often rises to 'a point of order' as a means of obtaining
the floor. The latter usage, which is based on practical grounds, should
not be confused with the raising of points of order under rule 73 [114]_*.
If your request is reviewed, it can be observed that the request it is
not directed to the President ‘/requesting him to make use of some power
inherent in his office or specifically given him under the rules of
procedure/', but you requests ‘/That the general assembly demonstrate
its lack of confidence in the LACRALO leadership and vote on this motion/’.
In simple terms, what you say is a point of order, it's really not. It
is therefore not possible to give such treatment.
Regards
El 10/09/2015 a las 3:39, Carlton Samuels escribió:
> Humberto:
> With the greatest of patience, you are wrong. Again.
>
> You are advised to read motion again then consult the Rule of
> Procedure closely. Rule 18 contains the authority and guidance for action.
>
> The motion was timed for a General Assembly. The question pertaining
> the vote and distribution of credentials to members made it so.
>
> The vote IS the question for decision.
>
> All the reasons for the motion are concatenated; an illegal assembly,
> a failure of process etc. The vote IS the question under discussion.
>
> If you don't understand the reason for not invoking Rule 8, I can
> explain it to you.
>
> I drafted the original Rules of Procedure and remain the competent
> authority.
>
> -Carlton Samuels
>
>
>
>
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> /Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround/
> =============================
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Humberto Carrasco
> <hcarrascob at gmail.com <mailto:hcarrascob at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Dear Jacqueline,
>
> By this email we respond to your request.
>
> Overall, we estimate that we cannot suspend the election for the
> following reasons:
>
> 1. The voting process began on Thursday, September 3, 2015, and
> runs until Thursday, September 10, 2015 until 23:00 hours.
>
> 2. The motion of Mr. Samuels was presented on Friday, September 4,
> 2015.
>
> In his email, Mr. Samuels raised a Point of Order and offered a
> motion of NO CONFIDENCE in the LACRALO leadership.
>
> He pointed out some arguments to justify his action and then he
> ended with:
>
> "Resolved:
>
> That the general assembly demonstrate its lack of confidence in
> the LACRALO leadership and vote on this motion."
>
> Thus, this paragraph says nothing about any suspension.
>
>
> 3. On 5 September, we informed to Mr Samuels that we requested an
> official translation to Spanish of his motion to be sent to the
> LACRALO's Spanish list.
>
> 4. Subsequently, the 7^th of September 2015 Alberto Soto informed
> that he had asked for legal advice from ICANN’s legal staff
> regarding this motion of censure.
>
> 5. The RoP in Articles 8.1 and 8.2 states the following:
>
> 8.1 During a discussion, any delegate may raise a point of order;
> such a point of order shall be immediately decided upon by the
> presiding officer.
>
> 8.2 An appeal may be made against the ruling of the presiding
> officer. Such an appeal shall be put to the vote immediately and
> the presiding officer's ruling shall stand, unless overruled by a
> simple majority of the ALS present and voting.
>
> These rules are silent regarding any suspension. Neither there has
> been any appeal. In any case, an appeal did not suspend the
> current vote.
>
> 6. There are articles relating to the suspension in Rule 9 that
> provides:
>
> Rule 9 - Procedural Motions
>
> 9.1 During a discussion, any delegate may move the suspension
> or adjournment of the meeting or the adjournment or closure of the
> debate.
>
> 9.2 Such a motion shall be put to the vote immediately. Subject
> to Rule 8.1, such motions shall have precedence in the following
> order over all other proposals or motions before the meeting:
>
> (a) Suspension of the meeting;
>
> (b) Adjournment of the meeting;
>
> (c) Adjournment of the debate on the question under discussion;
>
> (d) Closure of the debate on the question under discussion.
>
> 7. - Finally, with regard to the arguments and accusations of Mr.
> Samuels, they will be answered once the official translation into
> Spanish is sent to the LACRALO's Spanish list.
>
>
> Regards.
>
> Alberto Soto
> Humberto Carrasco
>
>
> El 09/09/2015 a las 15:39, Jacqueline Morris escribió:
>> Hi Humberto
>> I'm confused - there was a motion on the table from Carlton - the
>> motion of No Confidence. According to the RoP, this motion needs
>> to be debated and voted BEFORE the vote on ALAC rep can continue
>> (it takes precedence). This hasn't been done, so how can the vote
>> on ALAC rep be ending tomorrow?
>> Or was there a vote on the motion and I missed it?
>>
>> I am particularly concerned given the number of procedural
>> mistakes that seem to have occurred recently. We don't want more
>> issues with this vote.
>>
>> Jacqueline A. Morris
>> Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary,
>> Invisible and Free. (after Chris Lehmann
>> <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> )
>>
>> 2015-09-09 9:18 GMT-04:00 <hcarrascob at gmail.com
>> <mailto:hcarrascob at gmail.com>>:
>>
>>
>> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>>
>> Subject: Re: VOTE NOTICE: 2015 VOTE FOR REPRESENTATIVE
>> LACRALO ALAC / 2015 VOTE FOR REPRESENTATIVE TO THE LACRALO ALAC
>> From: hcarrascob at gmail.com <mailto:hcarrascob at gmail.com>
>>
>> Dear,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Do not forget that within Voting ends tomorrow Thursday 10
>> September 2015 at 23:00 UTC.
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The 04/09/2015 at 0:00, staff at atlarge.icann.org
>> <mailto:staff at atlarge.icann.org> wrote:
>> > [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]
>> >
>> > Asunto: VOTO ANUNCIO: 2015 VOTO PARA LACRALO ALAC
>> REPRESENTANTE / 2015 VOTO PARA REPRESENTANTE DE LACRALO ANTE
>> EL ALAC
>> > De: staff at atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff at atlarge.icann.org>
>> >
>> > [ES]
>> > Queridos todos,
>> >
>> >
>> > LACRALOs Presidencia y Secretaría gustaría anunciar el
>> inicio de la votación
>> > al Representante LACRALO ALAC para el período de dos años
>> a partir de las
>> > Al final de la reunión de Dublín ICANN en octubre de
>> 2015. Esta encuesta estará abierta
>> > desde jueves 03 septiembre 2015 hasta Jueves 10 de
>> septiembre 2015 a las 23:00 UTC.
>> >
>> >
>> > ***
>> > PREGUNTA: ¿A quién apoyas a convertirse en el ALAC
>> Representante LACRALO para
>> > el período de dos años a partir de finales de la reunión
>> de la ICANN en Dublín
>> > 10 2015? Por favor, seleccionar un candidato de la lista
>> de abajo (que se enumeran
>> > por orden alfabético del nombre de la familia) o abstenerse:
>> > * Harold Arcos
>> > * Juan Manuel Rojas
>> > * Abstenerse
>> > ***
>> > Información adicional se puede encontrar en la página de
>> elecciones Wiki:
>> > https://community.icann.org/x/moAQAw.
>> >
>> >
>> > ==
>> >
>> >
>> > [ES]
>> > Hola a todos,
>> >
>> >
>> > El Presidente y secretario de LACRALOs quisieran anunciar
>> el inicio del
>> > por voto párrafo Elegir al Representante de LACRALO ante
>> el ALAC Representante
>> > EL PERIODO DE 2 aos Empezando al final de de la reunin de
>> Dubln en Octubre
>> > del 2015. La votacin estarabierta desde el Lunes 03 de
>> Setiembre 2015 al
>> > Viernes 10 de Setiembre 2015 a las 23:00 UTC.
>> >
>> >
>> > ***
>> > PREGUNTA: A quien Elige Usted Para Ser Representante del
>> LACRALO ante el
>> > ALAC POR EL PERIODO DE 2 aos Comenzando en la reunión de
>> la ICANN en Octubre
>> > del 2015? Por favor ELIJA UN Candidato de la Lista Abajo
>> (en Orden
>> > alfabtico) o abstngase:
>> > * Harold Arcos
>> > * Juan Manuel Rojas
>> > * Abstencin
>> > ***
>> > Informacin Adicional Se Puede Encontrar En La pgina WIKI:
>> > https://community.icann.org/x/moAQAw.
>> >
>> >
>> > Saludos,
>> >
>> >
>> > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella
>> Gruber, Nathalie
>> > Peregrine y Terri Agnew
>> > El personal de ICANN política en apoyo de ALAC
>> > E-mail: staff at atlarge.icann.org
>> <mailto:staff at atlarge.icann.org>
>> > Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann
>> <http://www.facebook.com/icann> <
>> https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>
>> > AtLarge < https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>
>> > Twitter: @ < https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>
>> > < https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> [[--Original text (es)
>> http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/71b69bd4a9.html
>> --]]
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lac-discuss-en mailing list
>> lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> <mailto:lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lac-discuss-en mailing list
>> lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> <mailto:lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing list
> lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> <mailto:lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/lac-discuss-en/attachments/20150910/a14f43a3/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list