[ALAC] What to cover re GDPR in the HIT sessions?

Fri Aug 10 12:41:49 UTC 2018

Please note that the list here is no longer the 
one being discussed. This was GDPR-related only 
and there are other options. I will forward the 
new one. Some topics have already been merged, 
and there is a proposal for a further merger.

Alan

At 10/08/2018 04:21 AM, Maureen Hilyard wrote:
>Thank you Tijani
>
>I will put you down for the combined session as well
>
>M
>
>On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 8:18 PM, Tijani BEN 
>JEMAA 
><<mailto:tijani.benjemaa at benjemaa.com>tijani.benjemaa at benjemaa.com> wrote:
>Maureen,
>The proposed combination of topics 1, 2, 8, 9 
>and 13 makes a lot of sens for me since they are 
>overlapping / related, and can be done in 120 
>minutes session in my opinion. Donna gave a good 
>dispatching that may be improved.
>If we call Â« Topic 0 Â» this combined session 
>(including topics 1, 2, 8, 9 and 13), I will then propose:
>Topic 0
>Topic 3
>Topic 12
>If the combination is not accepted, then I will 
>rank my preferences as follow:
>Topic 3
>Topic 9
>Topic 12
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Tijani BEN JEMAA
>Executive Director
>Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI)
>Phone: +216 98 330 114
>            +216 52 385 114
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>>Le 10 aoÃ»t 2018 Ã  08:42, Maureen Hilyard 
>><<mailto:maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>maureen.hilyard at gmail.com> a Ã©crit :
>>Hi Seun
>>The document came from Donna Austin who is coordinating the GDPR sessions.
>>The option you have selected is a combination 
>>of the topics 1,2, 8, 9, 13 - that Donna gave 
>>as an option and our top 3 items are included in this list,
>>But they are all big items, can 5 topics be covered in one session?
>>As soon as I get these ALAC priorities 
>>organised (and anyone on this list can 
>>respond), I will pass it on to  Alan who can 
>>provide an appropriate response to send 
>>to  Donna on our behalf by Tuesday's meeting.
>>
>>M
>>On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 6:24 PM, Seun Ojedeji 
>><<mailto:seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> wrote:
>>Hello Maureen,
>>I don't know who wrote the attached document 
>>but I like the first option which suggests a 
>>combination of a couple of related topics and that would be my preference.
>>Regards
>>Sent from my mobile
>>Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>>On Fri, 10 Aug 2018, 01:53 Maureen Hilyard, 
>><<mailto:maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>maureen.hilyard at gmail.com> wrote:
>>Hi all
>>Attached is a list of topics from which the 
>>SO/AC chairs are considering a final list for inclusion into ICANN63 HIT slots.
>>Can you send me what you consider would be your 
>>top 2-3 topics? Not possible to cover 
>>everything. Id like to survey what the ALAC 
>>considers should be our suggested list (within the next 2-3 days?)
>>
>>M
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Austin, Donna via SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Aug 8 (2 days ago)
>>to SOAC-Leaders-I.
>>Hi Everyone
>>
>>Following on from the Planning Committee 
>>Meeting last week, where I agreed that I would 
>>reach out to those that submitted GDPR related 
>>topic proposals to see if we could find a way 
>>to rationalize these sessions in some way, 
>>unfortunately I have to report that I have not 
>>had much success. I reached out to those that 
>>had submitted the GDPR related sessions to see 
>>if there was some way that we could consolidate 
>>five of the proposed topics (see attached), but 
>>have yet to receive any response so Iâ€™ll put 
>>this down to â€˜that time of yearâ€™. 
>>Understanding that there is some urgency to 
>>resolve this to enable us to move forward with 
>>the planning for Barcelona I have attached the proposal that I developed.
>>
>>I also contacted Bruce Tonkin to see if he 
>>would be available to moderate/facilitate a 
>>consolidated session and he is available if 
>>that is something folks want to consider.
>>
>>I also spoke to Tanzie and there is some 
>>flexibility in the schedule, for example, it 
>>might be possible to schedule a 2 hour session 
>>on Wednesday from 10.00 to 12.00, but my strong 
>>preference would be to have a 90 minute session 
>>as I think 2 hours is probably too much. 
>>Perhaps another option, if those that submitted 
>>the proposals donâ€™t want to combine their 
>>sessions, is to allocate 30 minute slots (that 
>>would mean cutting one of the sessions). Of 
>>course that doesnâ€™t really help overcome the 
>>problem of reducing the number of Topic 
>>Proposals to fit the number of slots available.
>>
>>In thinking about the meeting schedule from a 
>>holistic perspective, itâ€™s my personal 
>>opinion that 7 sessions devoted to GDPR is too 
>>many. Thereâ€™s no doubt that it is a â€˜hot 
>>topicâ€™, but we should be mindful that there 
>>are a number of other efforts and issues that 
>>also require some air time as well and with 
>>limited time available we should be respectful 
>>of the large number of community members that 
>>will be attending the meeting that may have no interest in the topic.
>>
>>Iâ€™m not sure what our next steps are for 
>>winnowing down the Topic Proposals. Perhaps Tanzie can remind us.
>>
>>Thanks everyone.
>>
>>Donna
>>_______________________________________________
>>ALAC mailing list
>><mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>At-Large Online: <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/>http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>>ALAC Working Wiki: 
>><https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>ALAC mailing list
>><mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>At-Large Online: <http://www.atlarge.icann.org>http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>>ALAC Working Wiki: 
>><https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>
>_______________________________________________
>ALAC mailing list
>ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
>At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>ALAC Working Wiki: 
>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20180810/e9e0c11d/attachment.html>