[ALAC] What to cover re GDPR in the HIT sessions?

Fri Aug 10 18:37:05 UTC 2018

The GDPR topics prioritised by the ALAC differed to those proposed by NCSG
and the BC and will get swamped in  the consolidated discussion if we dont
at least mention our key interest areas and at least have someone on the
panel.
You might suggest that.

On Sat, 11 Aug 2018 6:27 am Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:

> Yes, I understood, but since that list came out:
>
> - several of the original sessions were merged
>
> - they are looking for input as to whether to merge them further or not
>
> - we need to decide where the non-GDPR sessions fit in the priority by
> Monday
>
> Alan
>
> --
> Sent from my mobile. Please excuse brevity and typos.
>
> On August 10, 2018 11:39:07 AM EDT, Maureen Hilyard <
> maureen.hilyard at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alan
>>
>> This was only to discuss the GDPR session.. Donna asked for a preference
>> rather than dealing with 7 topics in one session as had originally been
>> suggested. It would still be helpful to Donna to give her an idea of the
>> priority areas of interest from the ALAC as she has requested. The BC has
>> already proposed a preference and so should we.
>>
>> So far the separate topics of interest to the ALAC are (in priority
>> order):
>> 1. Public interest impact
>> 2. WHOIS data users
>> 3. Post GDPR
>> 4. Understanding RDAP
>>
>> Other topics for other sessions are still up for discussion.
>>
>> On Sat, 11 Aug 2018 12:48 am Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Please note that the list here is no longer the one being discussed.
>>> This was GDPR-related only and there are other options. I will forward the
>>> new one. Some topics have already been merged, and there is a proposal for
>>> a further merger.
>>>
>>> Alan
>>>
>>> At 10/08/2018 04:21 AM, Maureen Hilyard wrote:
>>>
>>> Thank you Tijani
>>>
>>> I will put you down for the combined session as well
>>>
>>> M
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 8:18 PM, Tijani BEN JEMAA <
>>> tijani.benjemaa at benjemaa.com> wrote: Maureen, The proposed combination
>>> of topics 1, 2, 8, 9 and 13 makes a lot of sens for me since they are
>>> overlapping / related, and can be done in 120 minutes session in my
>>> opinion. Donna gave a good dispatching that may be improved.
>>> If we call Â« Topic 0 Â» this combined session (including topics 1, 2,
>>> 8, 9 and 13), I will then propose: Topic 0 Topic 3 Topic 12 If the
>>> combination is not accepted, then I will rank my preferences as follow: Topic
>>> 3 Topic 9 Topic 12   -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Tijani BEN JEMAA Executive Director Mediterranean Federation of
>>> Internet Associations (FMAI) Phone: +216 98 330 114            +216 52
>>> 385 114
>>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Le 10 aoÃ»t 2018 Ã  08:42, Maureen Hilyard < maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>
>>> a Ã©crit :
>>> Hi Seun
>>> The document came from Donna Austin who is coordinating the GDPR
>>> sessions.
>>> The option you have selected is a combination of the topics 1,2, 8, 9,
>>> 13 - that Donna gave as an option and our top 3 items are included in this
>>> list,
>>> But they are all big items, can 5 topics be covered in one session?
>>> As soon as I get these ALAC priorities organised (and anyone on this
>>> list can respond), I will pass it on to  Alan who can provide an
>>> appropriate response to send to  Donna on our behalf by Tuesday's meeting.
>>>
>>> M
>>> On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 6:24 PM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com >
>>> wrote: Hello Maureen,
>>> I don't know who wrote the attached document but I like the first option
>>> which suggests a combination of a couple of related topics and that would
>>> be my preference.
>>> Regards
>>> Sent from my mobile Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>>> On Fri, 10 Aug 2018, 01:53 Maureen Hilyard, < maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>
>>> wrote: Hi all
>>> Attached is a list of topics from which the SO/AC chairs are considering
>>> a final list for inclusion into ICANN63 HIT slots.
>>> Can you send me what you consider would be your top 2-3 topics? Not
>>> possible to cover everything. Id like to survey what the ALAC considers
>>> should be our suggested list (within the next 2-3 days?)
>>>
>>> M
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Austin, Donna via SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Aug 8 (2 days ago) to SOAC-Leaders-I. Hi Everyone   Following on from
>>> the Planning Committee Meeting last week, where I agreed that I would reach
>>> out to those that submitted GDPR related topic proposals to see if we could
>>> find a way to rationalize these sessions in some way, unfortunately I have
>>> to report that I have not had much success. I reached out to those that had
>>> submitted the GDPR related sessions to see if there was some way that we
>>> could consolidate five of the proposed topics (see attached), but have yet
>>> to receive any response so Iâ€™ll put this down to â€˜that time of yearâ€™.
>>> Understanding that there is some urgency to resolve this to enable us to
>>> move forward with the planning for Barcelona I have attached the proposal
>>> that I developed.   I also contacted Bruce Tonkin to see if he would be
>>> available to moderate/facilitate a consolidated session and he is available
>>> if that is something folks want to consider.   I also spoke to Tanzie
>>> and there is some flexibility in the schedule, for example, it might be
>>> possible to schedule a 2 hour session on Wednesday from 10.00 to 12.00, but
>>> my strong preference would be to have a 90 minute session as I think 2
>>> hours is probably too much. Perhaps another option, if those that submitted
>>> the proposals donâ€™t want to combine their sessions, is to allocate 30
>>> minute slots (that would mean cutting one of the sessions). Of course that
>>> doesnâ€™t really help overcome the problem of reducing the number of Topic
>>> Proposals to fit the number of slots available.   In thinking about the
>>> meeting schedule from a holistic perspective, itâ€™s my personal opinion
>>> that 7 sessions devoted to GDPR is too many. Thereâ€™s no doubt that it is
>>> a â€˜hot topicâ€™, but we should be mindful that there are a number of
>>> other efforts and issues that also require some air time as well and with
>>> limited time available we should be respectful of the large number of
>>> community members that will be attending the meeting that may have no
>>> interest in the topic.   Iâ€™m not sure what our next steps are for
>>> winnowing down the Topic Proposals. Perhaps Tanzie can remind us.   Thanks
>>> everyone.   Donna
>>> _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list
>>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki:
>>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list
>>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki:
>>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ALAC mailing list
>>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>>
>>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>>> ALAC Working Wiki:
>>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC
>>> )
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20180811/bdb6a733/attachment.html>