[ALAC] What to cover re GDPR in the HIT sessions?

Maureen Hilyard maureen.hilyard at gmail.com
Fri Aug 10 08:21:59 UTC 2018


Thank you Tijani

I will put you down for the combined session as well

M

On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 8:18 PM, Tijani BEN JEMAA <
tijani.benjemaa at benjemaa.com> wrote:

> Maureen,
>
> The proposed combination of topics 1, 2, 8, 9 and 13 makes a lot of sens
> for me since they are overlapping / related, and can be done in 120 minutes
> session in my opinion. Donna gave a good dispatching that may be improved.
>
> If we call « Topic 0 » this combined session (including topics 1, 2, 8, 9
> and 13), I will then propose:
>
>    1. Topic 0
>    2. Topic 3
>    3. Topic 12
>
>
> If the combination is not accepted, then I will rank my preferences as
> follow:
>
>    1. Topic 3
>    2. Topic 9
>    3. Topic 12
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------
> *Tijani BEN JEMAA*
> Executive Director
> Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (*FMAI*)
> Phone: +216 98 330 114
>              +216 52 385 114
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------
>
> Le 10 août 2018 à 08:42, Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
> Hi Seun
>
> The document came from Donna Austin who is coordinating the GDPR sessions.
>
> The option you have selected is a combination of the topics 1,2, 8, 9, 13
> - that Donna gave as an option and our top 3 items are included in this
> list,
>
> But they are all big items, can 5 topics be covered in one session?
>
> As soon as I get these ALAC priorities organised (and anyone on this list
> can respond), I will pass it on to  Alan who can provide an appropriate
> response to send to  Donna on our behalf by Tuesday's meeting.
>
> M
>
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 6:24 PM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Maureen,
>>
>> I don't know who wrote the attached document but I like the first option
>> which suggests a combination of a couple of related topics and that would
>> be my preference.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Sent from my mobile
>> Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>>
>> On Fri, 10 Aug 2018, 01:53 Maureen Hilyard, <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> Attached is a list of topics from which the SO/AC chairs are considering
>>> a final list for inclusion into ICANN63 HIT slots.
>>>
>>> Can you send me what you consider would be your top 2-3 topics? Not
>>> possible to cover everything. Id like to survey what the ALAC considers
>>> should be our suggested list (within the next 2-3 days?)
>>>
>>> M
>>>
>>> Austin, Donna via SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning
>>> [image: Attachments]Aug 8 (2 days ago)
>>> to SOAC-Leaders-I.
>>> Hi Everyone
>>>
>>> Following on from the Planning Committee Meeting last week, where I
>>> agreed that I would reach out to those that submitted GDPR related topic
>>> proposals to see if we could find a way to rationalize these sessions in
>>> some way, unfortunately I have to report that I have not had much success.
>>> I reached out to those that had submitted the GDPR related sessions to see
>>> if there was some way that we could consolidate five of the proposed topics
>>> (see attached), but have yet to receive any response so I’ll put this down
>>> to ‘that time of year’. Understanding that there is some urgency to resolve
>>> this to enable us to move forward with the planning for Barcelona I have
>>> attached the proposal that I developed.
>>>
>>> I also contacted Bruce Tonkin to see if he would be available to
>>> moderate/facilitate a consolidated session and he is available if that is
>>> something folks want to consider.
>>>
>>> I also spoke to Tanzie and there is some flexibility in the schedule,
>>> for example, it might be possible to schedule a 2 hour session on Wednesday
>>> from 10.00 to 12.00, but my strong preference would be to have a 90 minute
>>> session as I think 2 hours is probably too much. Perhaps another option, if
>>> those that submitted the proposals don’t want to combine their sessions, is
>>> to allocate 30 minute slots (that would mean cutting one of the sessions).
>>> Of course that doesn’t really help overcome the problem of reducing the
>>> number of Topic Proposals to fit the number of slots available.
>>>
>>> In thinking about the meeting schedule from a holistic perspective, it’s
>>> my personal opinion that 7 sessions devoted to GDPR is too many. There’s no
>>> doubt that it is a ‘hot topic’, but we should be mindful that there are a
>>> number of other efforts and issues that also require some air time as well
>>> and with limited time available we should be respectful of the large number
>>> of community members that will be attending the meeting that may have no
>>> interest in the topic.
>>>
>>> I’m not sure what our next steps are for winnowing down the Topic
>>> Proposals. Perhaps Tanzie can remind us.
>>>
>>> Thanks everyone.
>>>
>>> Donna
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ALAC mailing list
>>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>>
>>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>>> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/di
>>> splay/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+
> Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20180810/a321da80/attachment.html>


More information about the ALAC mailing list