[lac-discuss-es] - Price caps - was: The Case for Regulatory Capture at ICANN | Review Signal Blog

[Roberto Gaetano]

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]
[[--This message had format issues and was not translated properly--]]


Tema:Re:   - Price caps - was: The Case for
 Regulatory Capture at ICANN | Review Signal Blog
Desde:Roberto Gaetano <roberto_gaetano en hotmail.com>

Excelente.
Entonces, maà ana comenzamos una votación global para la Junta Directiva de la ICANN.
Estoy seguro de que no desea que algunas partes de la población mundial se encuentren en desventaja sobre otras: la votación debe ser una oportunidad que sea igual para todos, independientemente de la geografía, el régimen político, la disponibilidad de conexión a Internet, el nivel de alfabetización. , y así.
Así que ahora, en la situación mundial actual en el 1.Julio de 2019, ¿cómo puede asegurarse de tener el mismo nivel de participación en el centro de la ciudad de Nueva York y en las estepas de Asia Central?
Para mí es obvio que si esto no se logra, el sistema estará sesgado fundamentalmente.
¿Suena esto como una discusión que ya tuvimos, y quizás más de una vez, en los últimos 20 aà os?
Aclamaciones,

Roberto



> On 01.07.2019, at 22:12, Karl Auerbach <karl en cavebear.com> wrote:
> 
> On 7/1/19 12:36 PM, Roberto Gaetano wrote
>> So, in short, how can ICANN get rid od the supposedly failing multi-stakeholder model and go back to what Paul R. Letho defines “democracy�?
>> Or, in simple words, how would a non-multi-stakeholder model be designed and implemented for ICANN?
> 
> That's pretty easy: Resurrect the system of nominations and elections from year 2000 (but expanded to cover the entire board-of-directors.)  Despite the denials of some, that system worked.  Yes, there were problems with the registration - including several caused by ICANN itself.  But that could have been cured on subsequent rounds.
> 
> The claim that in some regions (most particularly Asia/Pacific) that some large corporations "motivated" their employees probably had some truth.  But absent those elections those corporations in a "stakeholder" (or lobbyist) system most likely would have simply acted through the more certain and direct tool of those captive lobbyist/stakeholders than through the less certain tool of trying to influence individual electors.
> 
> Influence by those with size and wealth so that they can engage in any forum at any time and at any location will always be a problem, no matter the system.
> 
> In addition, to elections themselves, ICANN should put into place the protections afforded by law to allow the voting members to get the information they need to make informed choices and to take certain limited actions in certain extraordinary circumstances. The protections are not unreasonable; they have been honed on the stone of long practice and experience with ICANN-like organizations.
> 
> This change would a representative system, not a direct one - the real authority (and responsibility) between elections would remain where it ought to be (and legally is): vested in the board of directors.  At the next election the voters can replace those directors who fail to meet the voters' standards or whose pattern of decisions is not in accord with their desires.
> 
> Lobbyists would have to convince voters or convince the board members (hopefully via open and transparent means.)
> 
> By-the-way, in that sense, we are all lobbyists for our own interests.  But as individuals we are all lobbyists of roughly the same size.  We can't say the same about institutional lobbyists/stakeholders who are paid to advocate for the institutional goals 24x7x365.  Better a system based on rough equality than a system that naively presumes that giants don't have greater strength.
> 
>         --karl--
> 

_______________________________________________
lista de correo de lac-Discuss-en
lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy)

_______________________________________________
Al enviar sus datos personales, usted acepta el procesamiento de sus datos personales con el fin de suscribirse a esta lista de correo de conformidad con la Política de privacidad de la ICANN (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) y los Términos de servicio del sitio web (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). Puede visitar el enlace de Mailman anterior para cambiar el estado o la configuración de su membresía, incluida la cancelación de la suscripción, la configuración de la entrega de estilo de resumen o la desactivación total de la entrega (por ejemplo, para unas vacaciones), etc.y los Términos de Servicio del sitio web ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). Puede visitar el enlace de Mailman anterior para cambiar el estado o la configuración de su membresía, incluida la cancelación de la suscripción, la configuración de la entrega de estilo de resumen o la desactivación total de la entrega (por ejemplo, para unas vacaciones), etc. 

[[--Original text (en)
Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/0b211eec3a.html
--]]