Los números son simplemente erróneo.
carlton.samuels en gmail.com
carlton.samuels en gmail.com
Mar Sep 15 01:02:27 UTC 2015
[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]
Asunto: Re: Los números son simplemente erróneo.
De: carlton.samuels en gmail.com
He oído que algunos pueden leer e interpretar lo que escribo en el sentido de que estoy culpando
El personal de reportar números equivocados. Usted sería equivocado en ambos.
Soy * NO * y no puedo culpar al At-Large.
Se trata de la Secretaría que se encarga de verificar los votos. es
al Presidente que preside en la Asamblea General y es responsable ante
LACRALO para la notificación de los resultados de la Asamblea General.
No hay duda del conteo de votos es incorrecta. Y es la LACRALO
liderazgo que debe ejercer el deber de cuidado y seguir las reglas y
informar correctamente.
Esa frase fue mi advertencia a los lectores a esperar a los responsables ante
echar la culpa al personal. Y para exponer ese movimiento a la luz antes de que sea
hecho.
Ritz-Carlton Samuels
==============================
Carlton Un Samuels
Móvil: 876-818-1799
* Estrategia, Planeación, Gobierno, Evaluación y plazos de entrega *
=============================
El Lun, 14 de septiembre 2015 a las 9:13 AM, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels en gmail.com>
escribió:
> So another sham of a LACRALO election is endured.
>
> If you believe in a democratic institution based on rules and
> constitutional authority, the candidate declared the representative of
> LACRALO to the ALAC for the period 2015-2017 is as illegitimate as the
> election process was tainted and fraudulent.
>
> Here's more evidence of incompetence and sloth. Those vote numbers that
> are reported are plain wrong. Look for this to be blamed on staff.
>
> One really need not be a genius in discrete mathematics for it to be
> immediately obvious that with only 14 ALS voting in affirmative for the
> 'winner', that could NOT amount to 46% of the vote. It is the weighted
> percentage that counts, not any other fanciful figure pulled from some
> febrile brain.
>
> There are 20 countries represented in LACRALO. Each country is CAPPED at
> 5% of the vote.
>
> That 5% is deemed the Maximum Percentage.
>
> The 5% of vote is shared equally by the ALS in each country.
>
> The contribution of each voter is then proportional to the number of ALS
> in each country.
>
> Take the case of Argentina. There are nine (9) accredited ALS. Each ALS
> can only contribute and vote 0.56% of that Maximum Percentage.
>
> Take the case of Nicaragua. With only one (1) ALS, IEEE Nicaragua exercise
> the maximum 5% on its own for Nicaragua.
>
> LACRALO has forty-seven (47) ALS. Only 30 ALS participated in the sham of
> an election; BigPulse records 14 votes for Arcos, 8 votes for Rojas and 8
> abstentions.
>
> An abstention is counted as a 'no' vote under the rules.
>
> Seventeen (17) ALS were credentialed and did not vote. These could very
> well be classified 'election not acknowledged for crap'.
>
> See https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5014vdFeWMZF7tDJbzr4zuiD
>
> The real numbers are as follows :
>
> Did NOT vote - 37.87%
> Arcos - 27.67%
> Abstain/No - 19.04%
> Rojas - 15.42%
>
> There's your 100% of the possible vote accounted!
>
> LACRALO does not have a rule pertaining thresholds for legitimacy or
> runoffs. But this I know for sure. The 'winner' does not and cannot
> represent the interests of the Jamaican Internet user at the ALAC. Not on a
> fraudulent vote.
>
> The spreadsheet will be sent to staff. So that the connection be made to
> the authoritative precedent, I will also include the spreadsheet used to
> quantify the votes in 2008 that was originally developed by Nick
> Ashton-Hart.
>
> -Carlton Samuels
>
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
> =============================
>
[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/15ca778cae.html
--]]
Más información sobre la lista de distribución lac-discuss-es