[lac-discuss-es] [lac-discuss-en] FW: VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the Draft Report: Review of the Generic Names Supporting Organization

Ariel Liang ariel.liang en icann.org
Lun Ago 3 15:18:12 UTC 2015


Hello All, 

You may view the "ALAC Statement on the Draft Report: Review of the Generic
Names Supporting Organization" on its wiki workspace here, under 'FINAL
DRAFT VERSION TO BE VOTED UPON BY THE ALAC':
https://community.icann.org/x/35U0Aw.

For future reference, please be so kind to provide your input on the draft
ALAC Statement during its internal Œcall for comments¹ period and leave your
comments in the wiki workspace of the draft ALAC Statement. In that way,
penholder(s) can keep track of the community comments and take them into
consideration when revising the draft in a timely manner.

For every draft ALAC Statement, Staff send out a message to the
alac-announce mailing list that has ŒCALL FOR COMMENTS¹ in its subject line
and indicates the method and deadline for submitting input.

If you have any question/comment related to ALAC advice development process,
please don¹t hesitate to contact me.

Best Regards,
Ariel 

Ariel Xinyue Liang
Policy Analyst | Washington, DC

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)



Skype: ariel.liang.icann

Mobile: +1 (310) 804-2761

Email: ariel.liang en icann.org

Twitter: @ICANNAtLarge <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>

Facebook: www.facebook.com/icannatlarge
<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>


From:  <lac-discuss-en-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of Olivier
Crepin  Leblond <ocl en gih.com>
Date:  Monday, August 3, 2015 at 9:43 AM
To:  "lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org"
<lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Cc:  Vanda Scartezini <vanda en etges.com.br>
Subject:  Re: [lac-discuss-en] FW: VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the
Draft Report: Review of the Generic Names Supporting Organization

Hello all,

let me make this quite clear from the outset: ALAC members are asked to vote
on the Statement, not on the GNSO Review Report. The ALAC Statement mentions
the points it agrees with in the GNSO Review report. It mentions the points
it does not agree with and is pretty strong on criticising the Consultants
about the fact it completely missed the opportunity to evaluate the GNSO
Structure. The ALAC response is pretty clear about that.
The call for comments was made on 15 July. The only ALAC member from LAC
that commented was Vanda and her views were taken into account. The only
other LACRALO member that commented was Carlton Samuels and his views were
also taken into account.

In formulating the ALAC response, I unfortunately received no other input
from LACRALO members, despite requests for feedback.

Kind regards,

Olivier

On 03/08/2015 15:18, cveraq en gmail.com wrote:
> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
> 
>  Subject: Re: FW: VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the Draft Report:
> Review of the Generic Names Supporting Organization
>  From: cveraq en gmail.com
> 
>  Vanda: if you say &quot;I intend to vote in Please though I personally
> believe, and HAD Such statement made, That the review itself was really weak
> and did not touch Relevant several points.&quot;
> 
> 
>  It sounds contradictory and the vote should be against?
> 
> 
>  Carlos Vera Quintana
>  0988141143 
>  Sguemecveraq 
> 
> 
>> El 2/8/2015, a las 19:39, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty en gmail.com>
>> <mailto:apisanty en gmail.com>  escribió:
>> 
>> I intend to vote in favor though I personally believe, and had made such
>> statement, that the review itself was really weak and did not touch several
>> relevant points.
> 
> [[--Original text (es)
> http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/6e497ab67c.html
> --]]
> 
> 
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing list
> lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/
> listinfo/lac-discuss-en



------------ próxima parte ------------
Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/lac-discuss-es/attachments/20150803/04197a58/attachment.html>
------------ próxima parte ------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5086 bytes
Desc: no disponible
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/lac-discuss-es/attachments/20150803/04197a58/smime.p7s>


Más información sobre la lista de distribución lac-discuss-es