[lac-discuss-en] ???? = Iso-8859-1 3A_solicitud_de_comentarios q = FW = 3A = q = iso-8859-1 _Declaraci = F3n_de F3n_del_ALAC_sobre_la_introducci = _ = q = iso-8859-1 dos_caracteres_de_nombres_de_dominio_en_el_Nuevo_gT?? = = iso-8859-1? q? LD_Espacio_de_nombres? =
asoto at ibero-americano.org
asoto at ibero-americano.org
Tue Aug 12 15:01:55 UTC 2014
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re:???? = Iso-8859-1 3A_solicitud_de_comentarios q = FW = 3A = q = iso-8859-1 _Declaraci = F3n_de F3n_del_ALAC_sobre_la_introducci = _ = q = iso-8859-1 dos_caracteres_de_nombres_de_dominio_en_el_Nuevo_gT?? = = iso-8859-1? q? LD_Espacio_de_nombres? =
From: asoto at ibero-americano.org
Alejandro, the closing date agendmal comments, why not logr
arrive on time. I agree in part with you and also with Carlton. But no
with commentary by Alan, where deca that they had already been released domains
two digits and ESTN being used and will not unfair
freed ms. If hubiramos come in time and that there be consensus
be released, I will say it is not wrong but the correction of a
error.
Best Regards
Alberto Soto
----- Original Message -----
From: Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch [mailto: apisan at unam.mx]
Posted on: Tuesday, 12 August 2014 24:01
To: Alberto Soto; lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
Subject: RE: [lac-discuss-es] FW: Request for Comment: Statement of the
ALAC on the introduction of two-character domain names in the
New gTLD namespace
Alberto,
the declaracinbsicamente says nothing. And ALAC are already Voting.
This issue has been on the table long. In LACRALO who could
have more interest are those involved in disputed territories
international and is not expressed.
That suggests the conclusion that we really have a collective opinin
formed and should vote in abstention.
Of course there are also aware that they do not serposible
subsequently filed a complaint and we will be devoting the situation
to use existing codes of pas under new gTLDs: some
protections for today ESTN names in the list of ISO 3166-MA and
ningn future space on the second level to the regions involved
created or recognized, or cambin name (in the last decade or two in
Latin America at least three continental countries have changed names, or
Whether this ssucede).
Best regards.
Alejandro Pisanty
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
School of Chemistry UNAM
3000 University Av,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
+ 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
SMS +525541444475 +525541444475 FROM MEXICO
Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
Join the group on LinkedIn UNAM,
http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
________________________________________
From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
[Lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Alberto Soto
[Asoto at ibero-americano.org] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 14:43
To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] FW: Request for comments: Declaration
ALAC on the introduction of two-character domain names in the
New gTLD namespace
Thanks to the quick response Dev.
Dear, if you follow the thread that gives Dev, there vern reviews
found on this topic. Already have intervened Ftima and Ada, as podrn
see.
I welcome your comments
Best Regards
Alberto Soto
----- Original Message -----
From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
[Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of
devtee at gmail.com Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 3:04 pm
To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
Subject: Re: FW: Request for comments: ALAC Declaration on
introduction of two-character domain names in the new gTLD
Namespace
[[Translated text (en -> s) -]]
Subject: Re: FW: Request for comments: ALAC Declaration on
introduction of two-character domain names in the new gTLD
Namespace
From: devtee at gmail.com
Dear Alberto,
My attempt at a declaration ( https://community.icann.org/x/VqzhAg)
two points:
- Issues of safety and stability Absent any DNS related,
and given the use of
2 strings of various gTLD and ccTLD, convenience is
use more short domains potential registrants and two
characters for other meanings should not be any restriction of
Tags two character ASCII on the second level within the TLD as
registration agreements (5 blocks Specification for the two labels of all
characters in the second level, default)
- The second preocupacin is with respect to the logic that is used to
RSEP many applications excepcina the specification of
register 5 Release 2 asking not strings of letters in the ISO list
actual.Considero is erroneous because the ISO list is not static and
periodically updated to reflect changes in the passes and
territories. This gives rise to a potential gap in the future in which
some countries and territories ESTN protected in the Specification for the 5, but
future are not.This (in my mind) should not be and all the passing and
territories should be treated equally.
However, this second point has received several comments that if there
consensus to any restriction by the RSEPs qusolo requests,
especially since two labels of characters in the second level and
ESTN happening for various gTLD and ccTLD? And if you leave the second
preocupacin really have to say that the first preocupacin?
Dev Anand
On Friday, August 8, 2014 at 1:20 pm, <asoto at ibero-americano.org>
I wrote:
>
> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>
> Subject: FW: CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Introduction of
> Two-Character Domain Names in the New gTLD Namespace
> From: asoto at ibero-americano.org
>
> Hi Dev, please can make a summary of a few lines on this subject to
> our Regin?
>
>
> Thank you very much!
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Alberto
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: alac-announce-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> [Mailto: alac-announce-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of
> ICANN At-Large Staff Posted on: Friday, August 8, 2014 11:07 a.m.
> To: ALAC-Announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> Subject: [ALAC-Announce] CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the
> Introduction of Two-Character Domain Names in the New gTLD Namespace
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Olivier Crpin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, you Asked That a call for
> be made comments on the draft ALAC Statement on the Introduction of
> Two-Character Domain Names in the New gTLD Namespace
> < https://community.icann.org/x/VqzhAg>
> ALAC ratification process.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The current draft, as well as additional information on the Public
> Comment,
> can be found on the At-Large Introduction of Two-Character Domain Names
> the New gTLD Namespace Workspace <
> https://community.icann.org/x/VqzhAg>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Please submit any comments on the workspace by using the comments
> 11 August 2014 20:00 GMT.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie
> Peregrine and Terri Agnew
>
>
> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC
>
>
> E-mail: staff at atlarge.icann.org
>
>
> ich,% 20Vivanco 20Silvia%%% 20Ashtiani 20Matt% 20Liang 20Ariel%%% 20Gru
> 20Gisella
> ber, 20Nathalie%%% 20and% 20Peregrine 20Julia 20ICANN%%% 20Charvolen
> 20Policy% 20Sta
> ff% 20in% 20support% 20of% 20ALACmailto: staff at atlarge.icann.org>
>
>
>
>
>
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/bdbbf18235.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list