[lac-discuss-en] ???? = Iso-8859-1 3A_solicitud_de_comentarios q = FW = 3A = q = iso-8859-1 _Declaraci = F3n_de F3n_del_ALAC_sobre_la_introducci = _ = q = iso-8859-1 dos_caracteres_de_nombres_de_dominio_en_el_Nuevo_gT?? = = iso-8859-1? q? LD_Espacio_de_nombres? =

Tue Aug 12 15:01:55 UTC 2014

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re:???? = Iso-8859-1 3A_solicitud_de_comentarios q = FW = 3A = q = iso-8859-1 _Declaraci = F3n_de F3n_del_ALAC_sobre_la_introducci = _ = q = iso-8859-1 dos_caracteres_de_nombres_de_dominio_en_el_Nuevo_gT?? = = iso-8859-1? q? LD_Espacio_de_nombres? = 
 From: asoto at ibero-americano.org

 Alejandro, the closing date agendmal comments, why not logr 
 arrive on time. I agree in part with you and also with Carlton. But no 
 with commentary by Alan, where deca that they had already been released domains 
 two digits and ESTN being used and will not unfair 
 freed ms. If hubiramos come in time and that there be consensus 
 be released, I will say it is not wrong but the correction of a 
 error. 

 Best Regards 

 Alberto Soto 

 ----- Original Message ----- 
 From: Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch [mailto: apisan at unam.mx] 
 Posted on: Tuesday, 12 August 2014 24:01
 To: Alberto Soto; lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 Subject: RE: [lac-discuss-es] FW: Request for Comment: Statement of the 
 ALAC on the introduction of two-character domain names in the 
 New gTLD namespace 

 Alberto, 

 the declaracinbsicamente says nothing. And ALAC are already Voting. 
 This issue has been on the table long. In LACRALO who could 
 have more interest are those involved in disputed territories 
 international and is not expressed. 

 That suggests the conclusion that we really have a collective opinin 
 formed and should vote in abstention.

 Of course there are also aware that they do not serposible 
 subsequently filed a complaint and we will be devoting the situation 
 to use existing codes of pas under new gTLDs: some 
 protections for today ESTN names in the list of ISO 3166-MA and 
 ningn future space on the second level to the regions involved 
 created or recognized, or cambin name (in the last decade or two in 
 Latin America at least three continental countries have changed names, or 
 Whether this ssucede). 

 Best regards. 

 Alejandro Pisanty 

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty 
 School of Chemistry UNAM 
 3000 University Av,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico 

 + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD

 SMS +525541444475 +525541444475 FROM MEXICO 
 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com 
 LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty 
 Join the group on LinkedIn UNAM, 
 http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty 
 ---- &gt;&gt; Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org 
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

 ________________________________________ 
 From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 [Lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Alberto Soto 
 [Asoto at ibero-americano.org] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 14:43 
 To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] FW: Request for comments: Declaration 
 ALAC on the introduction of two-character domain names in the 
 New gTLD namespace 

 Thanks to the quick response Dev. 
 Dear, if you follow the thread that gives Dev, there vern reviews 
 found on this topic. Already have intervened Ftima and Ada, as podrn 
 see. 
 I welcome your comments 

 Best Regards

 Alberto Soto 

 ----- Original Message ----- 
 From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of 
 devtee at gmail.com Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 3:04 pm 
 To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 Subject: Re: FW: Request for comments: ALAC Declaration on 
 introduction of two-character domain names in the new gTLD 
 Namespace 

 [[Translated text (en -&gt; s) -]] 

 Subject: Re: FW: Request for comments: ALAC Declaration on 
 introduction of two-character domain names in the new gTLD 
 Namespace 
 From: devtee at gmail.com 

 Dear Alberto, 

 My attempt at a declaration (  https://community.icann.org/x/VqzhAg) 
 two points: 

 - Issues of safety and stability Absent any DNS related, 
 and given the use of 
 2 strings of various gTLD and ccTLD, convenience is 
 use more short domains potential registrants and two 
 characters for other meanings should not be any restriction of 
 Tags two character ASCII on the second level within the TLD as 
 registration agreements (5 blocks Specification for the two labels of all 
 characters in the second level, default) 

 - The second preocupacin is with respect to the logic that is used to 
 RSEP many applications excepcina the specification of 
 register 5 Release 2 asking not strings of letters in the ISO list 
 actual.Considero is erroneous because the ISO list is not static and 
 periodically updated to reflect changes in the passes and 
 territories. This gives rise to a potential gap in the future in which 
 some countries and territories ESTN protected in the Specification for the 5, but 
 future are not.This (in my mind) should not be and all the passing and 
 territories should be treated equally. 

 However, this second point has received several comments that if there 
 consensus to any restriction by the RSEPs qusolo requests, 
 especially since two labels of characters in the second level and 
 ESTN happening for various gTLD and ccTLD? And if you leave the second 
 preocupacin really have to say that the first preocupacin? 

 Dev Anand 

 On Friday, August 8, 2014 at 1:20 pm, <asoto at ibero-americano.org>
 I wrote: 
 > 
> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>
>  Subject: FW: CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Introduction of 
> Two-Character Domain Names in the New gTLD Namespace
>  From: asoto at ibero-americano.org
>
>  Hi Dev, please can make a summary of a few lines on this  subject to 
> our Regin?
>
>
>  Thank you very much!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  Alberto
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  From: alac-announce-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>  [Mailto: alac-announce-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of 
> ICANN  At-Large Staff  Posted on: Friday, August 8, 2014 11:07 a.m.
>  To: ALAC-Announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>  Subject: [ALAC-Announce] CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the  
> Introduction of Two-Character Domain Names in the New gTLD Namespace
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  Dear All,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  Olivier Crpin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, you Asked That a call for
>  be made comments on the draft ALAC Statement on the Introduction of
>  Two-Character Domain Names in the New gTLD Namespace
>  &lt;  https://community.icann.org/x/VqzhAg>
>  ALAC ratification process.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  The current draft, as well as additional information on the Public
> Comment,
>  can be found on the At-Large Introduction of Two-Character Domain Names
>  the New gTLD Namespace Workspace &lt;
> https://community.icann.org/x/VqzhAg>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  Please submit any comments on the workspace by using the comments
>  11 August 2014 20:00 GMT.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  Regards,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie
>  Peregrine and Terri Agnew
>
>
>  ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC
>
>
>  E-mail: staff at atlarge.icann.org
>
>
>  ich,% 20Vivanco 20Silvia%%% 20Ashtiani 20Matt% 20Liang 20Ariel%%% 20Gru
> 20Gisella
>  ber, 20Nathalie%%% 20and% 20Peregrine 20Julia 20ICANN%%% 20Charvolen
> 20Policy% 20Sta
>  ff% 20in% 20support% 20of% 20ALACmailto: staff at atlarge.icann.org&gt;
>
>
>
>
>

[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/bdbbf18235.html
--]]