[lac-discuss-en] FW: CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Proposed Bylaws Changes Regarding the Technical Liaison Group

[asoto at ibero-americano.org]

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: FW: CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Proposed Bylaws Changes Regarding the Technical Liaison Group 
 From: asoto at ibero-americano.org

 Although my english is bad, I agree with Alexander. It will appear instead of 
 direct action Group technician bond (TLG), habruna "response to 
 a request for information ... ". Ie if there is a request for 
 information not habrinformacin. And an action will not seem right 
 preventive to corrective action on demand. 


 Please read and comment. 


 Best Regards 


 Alberto Soto 




 ----- Original Message ----- 
 From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of Dr. 
 Alejandro Pisanty Baruch 
 Posted on: Sunday, November 24, 2013 3:25 pm
 To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 Subject: [lac-discuss-en] Re: [ALAC-Announce] CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC 
 Statement on the Proposed Bylaws Changes Regarding the Technical Liaison 
 Group 


 Colleagues, 


 Case of the query to which this message refers is of importance 
 relatively high. Try the amendments proposing ESTN 
 the rules applicable to Liaison Group Technician (Technical Liaison Group or 
 TLG). These amendments remove the contact person of the TLG 
 Board decisions and other spaces. 


 As a result, contact of the board with the technology is diluted and 
 becomes too indirect. 


 I wonder if you agree ESTN LACRALO opinin to issue a 
 ALAC, and instruct our / as representatives to defend their vote 
 against the proposed changes in the terms that describe the 
 immediately. The alternative we propose is to continue studying the 
 theme with an alternate solution to make cash without removing your TLG 
 current function.The text I propose already subcomo Comment 
 page Of ALAC and says: 


 "I do not think this reform is going in a good direction. It makes the 
 relationship of the Board with the technical community much more tenuous and 
 indirect. 


 ALAC representation as an Interrnet users (or voice, at least) Should be 
 That concerned the Board in its May advance more debates and decisions 
 Necessary technical without actually soliciting views before them, instead 
 of having the Technical Liaison Group's voice as one more When decisions are 
 being shaped, since the early stages. 


 We run the risk of privileging representation and diversity in the 
 composition of the Board while sacrificing the soundness of its decisions. 


 The technical liaison not only acts as described - "watchdog" acting as a 
 backstop against decisions Which Could Also be technically wrong but can 
 push for more creative solutions to problems. It is not only the knowledge 
 of the technology's constraints but the creativity based on the deep 
 awareness of its potential That We Could all be losing.


 By removing the liaison instead of fixing it, May we be supporting an act of 
 throwing away the baby with the bathwater. Let's not. " 


 Stay tuned for your comments and your time in function of them 
 solicitaraccin Presidency and Secretariat. 


 Alejandro Pisanty 




 --------------------------- 
     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty 
 UNAM Faculty of Chemistry 
 3000 University Avenue, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico 






 +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD 


 SMS +525541444475 +525541444475 FROM MEXICO 
 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com 
 LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty 
 Join the LinkedIn group UNAM, 
 http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty 
 ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org 
 .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


 ________________________________________ 
 From: alac-announce-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 [Alac-announce-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of ICANN At-Large 
 Staff [staff at atlarge.icann.org] Sent: I saturday, November 23, 2013 
 6:42 
 To: alac-announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 Subject: [ALAC-Announce] CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Proposed 
 Bylaws Changes Regarding the Technical Liaison Group 


 Dear All, 


 Olivier Crpin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, That you've asked to call for 
 comments be made on the draft "ALAC Statement on the Proposed Bylaws Changes 
 Regarding the Technical Liaison Group <  https://community.icann.org/x/_xmfAg>" 
 in preparation for the start of the ALAC ratification process. 


 The current draft can be found on the At-Large Proposed Bylaws Changes 
 Regarding the Technical Liaison Group 
 Workspace <  https://community.icann.org/x/_xmfAg>. 


 Please submit any comments on the workspace by using the comments function 
 06-Dec-2013 23:59 UTC. 


 A vote is to commence after comments have been collected. 


 Regards,


 Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie 
 Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC 
 E-mail: staff at atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff at atlarge.icann.org>
 _______________________________________________ 



[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/ab168ad8f1.html
--]]