[lac-discuss-en] FW: CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Proposed Bylaws Changes Regarding the Technical Liaison Group

apisan at unam.mx apisan at unam.mx
Sun Nov 24 18:17:00 UTC 2013


[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: FW: CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Proposed Bylaws Changes Regarding the Technical Liaison Group 
 From: apisan at unam.mx

 Colleagues, 


 Case of the query to which this message refers is of relatively high importance. Try the ESTN proposing amendments to the rules applicable to Liaison Group Technician (Technical Liaison Group or TLG). These amendments remove the person from TLG Liaison Board decisions and other spaces. 


 Consequently, the Board contact with technology is diluted and becomes too indirect. 


 I ask them if ESTN you agree that LACRALO issue a opinin to ALAC, and instruct our / as representatives to defend their vote against the proposed changes in the terms I describe immediately. The alternative we propose is to continue studying the issue with an alternative solution to make cash TLG without removing it from its current function.The text and propose the comment on page subcomo ALAC and says: 


 "I do not think this reform is going in a good direction. It makes the relationship of the Board with the technical community much more tenuous and indirect. 


 ALAC as an Interrnet users representation (or voice, at least) Should be concerned That the Board May advance more in its debates and decisions without Necessary technical views before actually soliciting them, instead of having the Technical Liaison Group's voice as one more When decisions are being shaped, since the early stages. 


 We run the risk of privileging representation and diversity in the composition of the Board while sacrificing the soundness of its decisions. 


 The technical liaison not only acts as described - "watchdog" acting as a backstop against decisions Which Could Also be technically wrong but can push for more creative solutions to problems. It is not only the knowledge of the technology's constraints but the creativity based on the deep awareness of its potential That We Could all be losing.


 By removing the liaison instead of fixing it, May we be supporting an act of throwing away the baby with the bathwater. Let's not. " 


 Stay tuned for your comments and your time in them solicitaraccin function of the Presidency and the Secretariat. 


 Alejandro Pisanty 




 --------------------------- 
     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty 
 UNAM Faculty of Chemistry 
 3000 University Avenue, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico 






 +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD 


 SMS +525541444475 +525541444475 FROM MEXICO 
 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com 
 LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty 
 Join the LinkedIn group UNAM, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty 
 ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org 
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


 ________________________________________ 
 From: alac-announce-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [alac-announce-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of ICANN At-Large Staff [staff at atlarge.icann.org] 
 Posted on: by saturday, November 23, 2013 6:42 
 To: alac-announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 Subject: [ALAC-Announce] CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Proposed Bylaws Changes Regarding the Technical Liaison Group 


 Dear All, 


 Olivier Crpin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, has asked for comments That a call be made on the draft "ALAC Statement on the Proposed Bylaws Changes Regarding the Technical Liaison Group <  https://community.icann.org/x/_xmfAg>" 


 The current draft can be found on the At-Large Proposed Bylaws Changes Regarding the Technical Liaison Group Workspace <  https://community.icann.org/x/_xmfAg>. 


 Please submit any comments on the workspace using the comments function by 06-Dec-2013 23:59 UTC. 


 A vote is to commence after comments have been collected. 


 Regards,


 Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen 
 ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC 
 E-mail: staff at atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff at atlarge.icann.org>
 _______________________________________________ 



[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/db18d6e62f.html
--]]




More information about the lac-discuss-en mailing list