[lac-discuss-en] FW: CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Proposed Bylaws Changes Regarding the Technical Liaison Group
fatimacambronero at gmail.com
fatimacambronero at gmail.com
Sun Nov 24 23:06:59 UTC 2013
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re: FW: CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Proposed Bylaws Changes Regarding the Technical Liaison Group
From: fatimacambronero at gmail.com
Alexander, all,
Thank you for calling the attention on this subject.
We adhere to the idea of \u200b\u200bhaving a discussion and a statement of
LACRALO on this matter. We are working with Dev and Len, analyzing
documents and making the necessary consultations to present a
LACRALO draft declaration on this subject before. Then if we
LACRALO consensus, which we presented as a declaration to ALAC.
Alejandro, YOU CAN help you understand These qut say
modifications to remove the TLG liaison decisions
the Board when this liaison is a non-voting person? This
may help us develop a better position on the issue.
These are the documents to be reviewed to better understand this
subject:
The Wiki-At-Large where the drafts and opinions
presented on this topic http://bit.ly/1bgvfid
-The final report of the Working Group on Relations Board
Techniques (TRANSLATION own name in english Final Report from the Board
Technical Relations Working Group): http://bit.ly/1bgvtpu
-The draft of the proposed changes to the ICANN Bylaws in
the corresponding sections: http://bit.ly/1bgvwkY
We appreciate all the feedback we can get or do
proposals they want to present declaration.
Best Regards,
Fatima
2013/11/24 Alberto Soto <asoto at ibero-americano.org>
> Si bien mi inglés es malo, coincido con Alejandro. Parecería que en lugar
> de
> una acción directa del Grupo de enlace técnico (TLG), habrá una "respuesta
> a
> una solicitud de información...". Es decir, que si no hay una solicitud de
> información, no habrá información. Y no parecería correcto una acción
> preventiva a una acción correctiva on demand.
>
> Por favor, lean y opinen.
>
> Saludos cordiales
>
> Alberto Soto
>
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> [mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] En nombre de Dr.
> Alejandro Pisanty Baruch
> Enviado el: domingo, 24 de noviembre de 2013 03:25 p.m.
> Para: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> Asunto: [lac-discuss-es] RV: [ALAC-Announce] CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC
> Statement on the Proposed Bylaws Changes Regarding the Technical Liaison
> Group
>
> Colegas,
>
> el asunto de la consulta a la que se refiere este mensaje es de importancia
> relativamente alta. Trata de las modificaciones que se están proponiendo a
> las reglas aplicables al Grupo de Enlace Técnico (Technical Liaison Group o
> TLG). Estas modificaciones remueven a la persona de enlace del TLG de las
> decisiones del Board y otros espacios.
>
> Como consecuencia, el contacto del Board con la tecnología se diluye y
> vuelve demasiado indirecto.
>
> Les pregunto si están Uds. de acuerdo en que LACRALO emita una opinión al
> ALAC, e instruya a nuestros/as representantes a defenderla con su voto
> contra las modificaciones propuestas, en los términos que describo de
> inmediato. La alternativa que debemos proponer es que se siga estudiando el
> tema con una solución alterna que haga efectivo al TLG sin removerlo de su
> función actual. El texto que propongo ya lo subí como comentario en la
> página de ALAC y dice:
>
> "I do not think this reform is going in a good direction. It makes the
> relationship of the Board with the technical community much more tenuous
> and
> indirect.
>
> ALAC as an Interrnet users representation (or voice, at least) should be
> concerned that the Board may advance more in its debates and decisions
> without necessary technical views before actually soliciting them, instead
> of having the Technical Liaison Group's voice as one more when decisions
> are
> being shaped, since the early stages.
>
> We run the risk of privileging representation and diversity in the
> composition of the Board while sacrificing the soundness of its decisions.
>
> The technical liaison acts not only as described - "watchdog" acting as a
> backstop against decisions which could be technically wrong but also can
> push for more creative solutions to problems. It is not only the knowledge
> of the technology's constraints but the creativity based on the deep
> awareness of its potential that we could all be losing.
>
> By removing the liaison instead of fixing it, we may be supporting an act
> of
> throwing away the baby with the bathwater. Let's not."
>
> Quedo atento a sus comentarios y en su momento en función de ellos
> solicitaré acción de la Presidencia y la Secretaría.
>
> Alejandro Pisanty
>
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
> Facultad de Química UNAM
> Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
>
>
>
> +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
>
> +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475
> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
> Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn,
> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
> ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
> .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>
> ________________________________________
> Desde: alac-announce-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> [alac-announce-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] en nombre de ICANN
> At-Large
> Staff [staff at atlarge.icann.org] Enviado el: sábado, 23 de noviembre de
> 2013
> 06:42
> Hasta: alac-announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> Asunto: [ALAC-Announce] CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Proposed
> Bylaws Changes Regarding the Technical Liaison Group
>
> Dear All,
>
> Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, has asked that a call for
> comments be made on the draft "ALAC Statement on the Proposed Bylaws
> Changes
> Regarding the Technical Liaison Group<https://community.icann.org/x/_xmfAg
> >"
> in preparation for the start of the ALAC ratification process.
>
> The current draft can be found on the At-Large Proposed Bylaws Changes
> Regarding the Technical Liaison Group
> Workspace<https://community.icann.org/x/_xmfAg>.
>
> Please submit any comments on the workspace using the comments function by
> 06-Dec-2013 23:59 UTC.
>
> A vote is to commence after comments have been collected.
>
> Regards,
>
> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie
> Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC
> E-mail: staff at atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff at atlarge.icann.org>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC-Announce mailing list
> ALAC-Announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-es mailing list
> lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>
> http://www.lacralo.org
>
>
> ---
> Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protección de avast!
> Antivirus está activa.
> http://www.avast.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-es mailing list
> lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>
> http://www.lacralo.org
>
* Fatima * Cambronero
Attorney-Argentina
Phone: +54 9351 5282 668
Twitter: @ facambronero
Skype: fatima.cambronero
* Join the LACRALO / ICANN discussions: *
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
* Join the Diplo Internet Governance Community discussions: *
http://www.diplointernetgovernance.org/
* Join to the Internet Society (ISOC): * http://www.internetsociety.org/
_______________________________________________
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/4a6533f8ad.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list