[lac-discuss-en] in the translations

[Jacqueline Morris]

I agree with the idea of ICANN staff to find a better translation programme.
I do still hold to my point that a bad translation is far better than trying
to read it myself with rudimentary spanish, or to miss out entirely.
Any inconsistencies or misunderstandings have usually been cleared up easily
after some more discussion, at least in the years I have been on the lists.

Jacqueline A. Morris
Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and Free.
(after Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> )



On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:25 PM, <cveraq at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>
>
> Subject: Re: in the translations
> From: cveraq at gmail.com
>
> A bad translation can be very dangerous because they are possible to be
> mistaken
> terminos, the sense of the things, etc.
>
> If atlarge like great or board like card is even translated imaginemonos
> what can happen...
>
> Existing google translator no longer nothing is necessary to dedicate
> effort to translate with so bad results that can very well dedicate a
> other substantial subjects and for which always resources are required by
> another side always little
>
> For those who require translation support, to use a translatorin two click
> it sounds very logico.
>
> On the other hand I reiterate my request to receive email in its original
> language
> ingles is or Spanish and not to receive translations.
>
> Warm greeting and thanks for the attention that can be given this
> restlessness
>
> Carlos Side
>
>