[lac-discuss-en] ccTLD CO
andrespiazzagpj at hotmail.com
andrespiazzagpj at hotmail.com
Sun Apr 18 20:00:57 CDT 2010
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re: ccTLD CO
From: andrespiazzagpj at hotmail.com
Jose thanks Luis to raise these preoccupations...
Already the habiamos done. Gustaria me to have a ACUI position on the subject in the list. Not to see worries it to me.
In the profile of Antonio Medina in Facebook I saw that subio a video recently and abstracts it in pantallazo. Sera this the ACUI position?
http://twitpic.com/1gpeat
Serious good for knowing it
Greetings,
Andres Piazza
> From: joseluis at barzallo.com > To: andrespiazzagpj at hotmail.com; lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org > Subject: RE: [ lac-discuss-is ] ccTLD CO > Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:01:42 -0500 > > Considered > > Our Antonio friend can help us with its commentaries from its optics > of Colombian user front to which it happens. > > gives a Antonio hand please Us? > > warm Greetings, > > Jose Luis > > AEDIT > www.aedit.org.ec > > Columbus 535 and 6 of December. > Edif. Cristóbal Columbus Of. 602 > Telf: (593 2) 2528774/ 2544464 > Fax: 593 2 2564530 > email: joseluis at barzallo.com > Exempt Ecuador > > original -----Mensaje > Of: lac-discuss-it is -bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org > [ mailto:lac-discuss-is -bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org ] In name of Andres > Piazza > Envoy: Thursday, 08 of April of 2010 14:15 > For: Spanish LACRALO > Subject: [ lac-discuss-is ] ccTLD CO > > > > Considered, > Something we talked in the teleconferencing passed about ccTLD CO and many > of us!
we expressed ourselves on the individual. > > Aprovecho to copy aqui a chain of the ready Internet Governance > Cactus. > > Hay to read the post office of down upwards following the Thread. > > I must say that opinion of Carlos Afonso identifies to me. > > Greetings, > > Andres Piazza > > Forwarded message > From: Fouad Bajwa <fouadbajwa at gmail.com> > > Date: 2010/4/8 > Subject: Re: [ governance ] privatising ccTLDs > To: governance at lists.cpsr.org, David Goldstein > <goldstein_david at yahoo.com.au> > > > > This may be interesting to many ace it dog serve ace marriesstudy from the > > developing world: > > > > There plows many ccTLD disparities prevalent in the developing world. > > For example in the marries of Pakistan, the official ccTLD for pk was > > to to Pakistani given in the Time of IANA based in the U.S. who there are now > > eats back to Pakistan. The ccTLD www.pknic.net.pk was to under an IANA > > allocation and wasn't shifted to the new ICANN c!
ontracting. For a > > country of 170 million extra population!
the fol
lowing plows the domain > > registration stats where only 29557 domains have been registered: > > > > stats for PKNIC > > 2010-04-07: > > domains: 29557 > > nameservers: 1179 > > > > There is to consumer in-confidence in PKNIC, people plows reluctant to take > > over-priced domains from PKNIC. PKNIC only registers domains for a > > period of two years for $25 to domain whereas to TLD for dog be acquired > > only $16 for two years. Each Time the debates on decentralization of > > PKNIC you eat up, PKNIC there are connection in the high upyou please and is > > easily able to revoke such efforts. > > > > When we started raising these issues, PKNIC invited and included some > > of our Civil Society members to its board of advisers and the members > > fell for it and felt under honoured to be included in the board that they > > forgot what the present Internet Governance problems were. They still > > continue to participate in the IGC but plows prone to PKNI!
Cinterests > > which of course is to very big drawback. > > > > PKNIC there are occasionally broken down in its service with outages > > sometimes to over weeks. Our CS members have started gaining certain > > interests local from PKNIC which were publicly questioned by both the > > and international communities visible ace publicly here: > > http://public.icann.org/node/343. > > > > PKNIC's monopoly cannot be broken through to public-privatepartnership > > between civil society, academy, private sector and govt > > to multistakeholder collaboration. The result is that people plows dwells > > oriented to acquire TLD domains ace to per today the total TLD domains in > > the country stand AT approximately: > > > > Total Domains in Pakistan: 41,380 > > (Source:http://www.webhosting.info/registries/country_stats/PK) > > > > IF we look AT our neighbouring country India, to their ccTLD runs ace a > > to multistakeholder partnership due to which they have dw!
ells than half a > > million local domains. Similarly to thei!
r TLD re
gistrationsplows also AT > > the same to number: > > Total Domains in India: 559,213 > > (Source:http://www.webhosting.info/registries/country_stats/IN) > > > > This clearly shows that allowing ccTLD's to monopolize to their positions > > in the country effect the citizens of those countries in the following > > ways: > > > > 1. Control not to over ccTLD monopolies > > 2. Access low-cost ccTLD > > 3. Have to buy dwells TLD instead of ccTLD > > 4. Less to consumer choices > > 5. Cost of entry to Internet/Web too high > > 6. Local Lesser opportunities for initiative growth (with respect to > > building local online activities backed by local domains) > > 7. Threat to IDNs and GTLD operations when the same ccTLD operator dog > > influence govt and to other groups to host to their GLTDs/IDNs to under the > > same infrastructure. > > > > Such monopolies have to be broken otherwise ICANN will onlybe > > benefiting to handful. > > > > Best Regards > > Fo!
uad Bajwa > > > > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 AT 4:37 A.M., David Goldstein > > <goldstein_david at yahoo.com.au> wrote: > > > Carlos, > > > > > > Any to register that registers DE domain names dog provide an address, even > if for registrars outside Germany this dog be to headache. Nominet you have no > restrictions I a.m. aware of. AuDA there are restrictions that say for com.au > addresses the person or organisation must have an Australian business to number > from the tax office and the name must have some relationship with to their > work. > > > > > > > And when there plows to over 13 million domains, such aceDE and to over 8 million > (UK) it * IS * much to harder to get your preferred Domain Name than say, if > there plows to over one million (AU and CA). > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > David > > > > > > > > > > > > Original Message > > > From: Carlos To Afonso <ca at cafonso.ca> > > > To: governance at lists.cpsr.org; !
David Goldstein > <goldstein_david at yahoo.com.au> > > > Sen!
t: Wed,
7 April, 2010 10:58:41 P.m. > > > Subject: Re: [ governance ] privatising ccTLDs > > > > > > David, some additional comments below. > > > > > > -- c.a. > > > > > > David Goldstein wrote: > > > > Carlos ET to, > > > [... ] > > > > for Some have to requirement to the premises contact ace part of the > > > > registration process, but this is often easily providedby a > > > > to register. And the given that world's to number one ccTLD and probably > > > > to number 2 ccTLD, DE and UK respectively, allow peoplefrom around > > > > the world to to register domain names in their ccTLDs and the world > > > > hasn't fails in, then it's not too big to problem. > > > > > > Not sure about any restrictions in Nominet (could not find specific > > > policy requirements in their Web site), but DENIC requires to legal > > > German address: "It is possible for individuals or institutions (that > >!
> have legal capacity) not located in Germany to to register de domains. > > > There is, to however, to condition, namely that they mustappoint an > > > administrative contact who is resident in Germany and whoyou have to postcard > > > possible address AT which it is to serve documents (i.e. not to mere P.O. > > > box). The administrative contact is then also the person formally > > > authorized by the domain to holder to receive service of official or court > > > documents (Zustellungsbevollmächtigter) within the meaning of the German > > > Code of Civil Procedure (Zivilprozessordnung) and the German Code of > > > Criminal Procedure (Strafprozessordnung). For The reason this measure is > > > to ensure that if any party there are to legal claim to pursue, it is not made > > > dwells difficult for them by having to serve official or court documents > > > in another country, which is often to long, drawn-out process." > > >!
; > > > Not sure about AuDA to either, but CIRA (Canada) d!
oes requ
ire proof of > > > legal Canadian citizenship or to address in Canada. > > > > > > > The main issue I see is that by opening up the ccTLD means it is > > > > to harder for residents to get to their own ccTLD domain. > > > > > > Not sure about this. Is think it might even become to easier, although they > > > will have to is incumbent on for certain addresses with global registrants. My > > > point is that this "internationalization" just to make money defeats the > > > original purpose of having ccTLDs national ace the realm of identities in > > > the Domain Name System. Otherwise, let U.S. all join GNSO:) > > > > > > cheers > > > > > > -- c.a. > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers David > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Original Message From: Carlos To Afonso <ca at cafonso.ca> > > > > To: governance at lists.cpsr.org; McTim <dogwallah at gmail.com> Sent: Wed, > > > > 7 Apr!
il, 2010 9:11:35 P.m. Subject: Re: [ governance ] privatising ccTLDs > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi McTim, I dog start by saying: cheap and quick way toget to gTLD... > > > >:) There is to business group which convinces to community (or to their > > > > government, ace I think Colombians have not had the opportunity to > > > > properly and widely debates this) that to their national identity on the > > > > Internet is not to longer relevant and let you take to over and convert > > > > to their ccTLD into to commodity for the international domain market. > > > > > > > > In the marries of Colombia, it is clears strange. It isto country with 44 > > > > million people, relatively high HDI and the third largest South > > > > American economy -- hard to see how this is going to generate any > > > > significant amount of money to benefit Colombia -- thisis Officers' Club of Revolutionary Armed F!
orces from > > > > being Tuvalu. On the to other hand, !
given th
e size of the economy and > > > > Internet penetration in the country, it is hard to see how a > > > > non-profit self-sustainable operation to keep to their ccTLD in the > > > > national commons would not succeed. > > > > > > > > But this is my view and I a.m. not to Colombian (just to Latin American), > > > > under... But it makes me sad to know that xyz.co not tolonger points to a > > > > Colombian Internet space. > > > > > > > > frt rgds > > > > > > > > -- c.a. > > > > > > > > McTim wrote: > > > > > http://www.cointernet.co/ > > > > > > > > > > Do we have any thing to say on this? > > > > > > > > > > This type of thing would be to fruitful workshop topic IMO. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Carlos To Afonso > > > CGI.br (www.cgi.br) > > > Nupef (www.nupef.org.br) > > > ======!
============================== > > > new/nuevo/novo email: ca at cafonso.ca > > > ==================================== > > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > > You received this message ace to subscriber on the list: > > governance at lists.cpsr.org > > To be you remove from the list, send any message to: > > governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org > > > > For all list information and functions, see: > > http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance > > > > Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t > > _________________________________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-is mailing list > lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es_atlarge-lists > icann.org > > http://www.lacralo.org > >
_________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/5428bf7489.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list