[lac-discuss-en] Let us give to return the pagina

sricciardi at fibertel.com.ar sricciardi at fibertel.com.ar
Wed Feb 17 11:55:12 CST 2010


[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]


Subject: Re: Let us give to return the pagina
From: to sricciardi at fibertel.com.ar

Considered, 
 
Pardon by these weeks of silence. 
I changed of Company/signature, and I am adapting me to my new tasks. 
Of course that it would enchant to me to retake the leadership of thissubject. 
Between today and tomorrow I will send a rough draft (that already I have ready but I want   
to review) to begin to discuss in the list. 
A hug, 
 
Sebastián 
 
On Feb 17, 2010, AT 3:30 p.m., Alexander Pisanty wrote: 
> Andrés, > > very many clearer now. > > I offer like contact for the discussion of ccNSO review. > > first that I recommend on the matter, given to the stage in that that goes   > process, is that all the interested ones answer the survey that is   > circulating the team of consultants in charge of the project, the plus   > soon possible. Manifiéstense, I preferably believe that outside   > list. > > seems important to Me the fourth subject that you mention, integration   > vertical registry-recording, and we must retake it with haste and   > studying new documents published yesterday by ICANN to   > respect. I add me to your question on if Sebastián Ricciardi would be   > in conditions for retaking the leadership. > > Warm greeting. > > Alexander Pisanty > >. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > Dr Alexander Pisanty > UNAM, Av. University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico > > Tels. +52-(1)-55-5105-6044, +52-(1)-55-5418-3732 > > * My blog/My blog: http://pisanty.b!
 logspot.com > * LinkedIn procases out: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > * Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty > * Unete to group UNAM in LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/Â106C0C8614 > > * Sees ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org.mx, ISOC http://www.isoc.org > * Participates in ICANN, http://www.icann.org >. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > > > On Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Andres Piazza wrote: > > &gt; Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:33:01 +0000 > &gt; From: Andres Piazza <andrespiazzagpj at hotmail.com> > &gt; To: apisan at servidor.unam.mx, joseluis at barzallo.com > &gt; Cc: carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com, > &gt; "[ iso-8859-1 Spanish ] LACRALO" <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org  > &gt; &gt;, > &gt; to sricciardi at fibertel.com.ar > &gt; Subject: RE: [ lac-discuss-is ] returned Demos the pagina > &gt; > &gt; > &gt; Tienes all the reason Alexander, with respect to that we needed   > &gt; to focus to us in less... > &gt; > &gt; But I believe that my mail was no!
 t understood correctly, we go of   > &gt; new: The 3 subjects !
 that you
 raised in your initial mail and the one that I   > &gt; I listed in my previous mail can be the 4 chosen in this   > &gt; limited approach, that is to say: > &gt; > &gt; - People and Criteria for "reviews" organizacionales. > &gt; - New Expressions of Interest for gTLD. > &gt; - Review of ccNSO. > &gt; > &gt; and I had mentioned "Vertical Integration" (I copy to Sebastián   > &gt; Ricciardi, to see if he wants to collaborate with statement that   > &gt; we do). > &gt; > &gt; Also I believe that we must be pronounced on Consumers Constituency   > &gt; Proposal. > &gt; > &gt; For being well operative I propose that we define a person   > &gt; voluntary to take ahead the discussions on each one of   > &gt; these 5 topics (if they want I can be I in the one of the Expressions of   > &gt; Interest of New GTLD). > &gt; > &gt; Outside this, the list is but long, in the ALAC Internal of yesterday   > &gt; was discussing on the 14 that there is at the moment in   > &gt; Calendar of!
  "Policy Advice" and the necessity to focus. Them   > &gt; I put the list of only 14 to the aims of which somebody can want   > &gt; to work one of these, but is going away to have to order To lead it: > &gt; > &gt; 1. Uniform Rapid Suspension > &gt; 2. METRIC TON Clearinghouse > &gt; 3. Post Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedure (PPDRP) > &gt; 4. Registry Restrictions Dispute Resolution Procedure (RRDRP) > &gt; 5. 3 IDN Character > &gt; 6. IDN Variants > &gt; 7. Benchmarking of Registry Operations > &gt; 8. Process of gTLD Registry Agreement Amendments > &gt; 9. Proposed for Framework FY 2011 Operating Plan and Budget > &gt; 10. Draft Report on WHOIS Accuracy > &gt; 11. Global DNS-CERT Business CASE > &gt; 12. Proposed Strategic for Initiatives Improved DNS   > &gt; Security, Stability and Resiliency > &gt; 13. Registration Abuse Policies Initial Report. > &gt; 14. Working Group Guidelines > &gt; > &gt; Greetings, > &gt; > &gt; Andrés Piazza > &gt; > &gt; ______________!
 ___________________________________________________ > &gt; > &!
 gt; 
 
 
_______________________________________________ 




[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/84253ba589.html
--]]





More information about the lac-discuss-en mailing list