[lac-discuss-en] Let us give to return the pagina
andrespiazzagpj at hotmail.com
andrespiazzagpj at hotmail.com
Wed Feb 17 12:52:15 CST 2010
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re: Let us give to return the pagina
From: andrespiazzagpj at hotmail.com
Hello Sebastian that good for knowing of vos..
The rough draft that you sent was discussed with some consensuses expressed in this list after which you sent it. Now one is to canalizethe debate to be able to carry out a contribution but conctreto Statement type. Your rough draft is for a Declaration?
Greetings,
Andrés
PS to the contributions of Dev and Jose Barzallo I thank for them, I believe that with this we have the high-priority agenda and the complementary one. We go directed!
Sent from BlackBerry®
-----Original Message
From: Sebastian Ricciardi <sricciardi at fibertel.com.ar>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:03:06
To: Alexander Pisanty<apisan at servidor.unam.mx>
Cc: Andres Piazza<andrespiazzagpj at hotmail.com>; LACRALO Español<lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] returned Demos the pagina
Considered,
Pardon by these weeks of silence.
I changed of Company/signature, and I am adapting me to my new tasks.
Of course that it would enchant to me to retake the leadership of thissubject.
Between today and tomorrow I will send a rough draft (that already I have ready but I want
to review) to begin to discuss in the list.
A hug,
Sebastián
On Feb 17, 2010, AT 3:30 p.m., Alexander Pisanty wrote:
> Andrés, > > very many clearer now. > > I offer like contact for the discussion of ccNSO review. > > first that I recommend on the matter, given to the stage in that that goes > process, is that all the interested ones answer the survey that is > circulating the team of consultants in charge of the project, the plus > soon possible. Manifiéstense, I preferably believe that outside > list. > > seems important to Me the fourth subject that you mention, integration > vertical registry-recording, and we must retake it with haste and > studying new documents published yesterday by ICANN to > respect. I add me to your question on if Sebastián Ricciardi would be > in conditions for retaking the leadership. > > Warm greeting. > > Alexander Pisanty > >. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > Dr Alexander Pisanty > UNAM, Av. University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico > > Tels. +52-(1)-55-5105-6044, +52-(1)-55-5418-3732 > > * My blog/My blog: http://pisanty!
.blogspot.com > * LinkedIn procases out: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > * Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty > * Unete to group UNAM in LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/Â106C0C8614 > > * Sees ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org.mx, ISOC http://www.isoc.org > * Participates in ICANN, http://www.icann.org >. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > > > On Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Andres Piazza wrote: > > > Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:33:01 +0000 > > From: Andres Piazza <andrespiazzagpj at hotmail.com> > > To: apisan at servidor.unam.mx, joseluis at barzallo.com > > Cc: carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com, > > "[ iso-8859-1 Spanish ] LACRALO" <lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org > > >, > > to sricciardi at fibertel.com.ar > > Subject: RE: [ lac-discuss-is ] returned Demos the pagina > > > > > > Tienes all the reason Alexander, with respect to that we needed > > to focus to us in less... > > > > But I believe that my mail was !
not understood correctly, we go of > > new: The 3 subject!
s that y
ou raised in your initial mail and the one that I > > I listed in my previous mail can be the 4 chosen in this > > limited approach, that is to say: > > > > - People and Criteria for "reviews" organizacionales. > > - New Expressions of Interest for gTLD. > > - Review of ccNSO. > > > > and I had mentioned "Vertical Integration" (I copy to Sebastián > > Ricciardi, to see if he wants to collaborate with statement that > > we do). > > > > Also I believe that we must be pronounced on Consumers Constituency > > Proposal. > > > > For being well operative I propose that we define a person > > voluntary to take ahead the discussions on each one of > > these 5 topics (if they want I can be I in the one of the Expressions of > > Interest of New GTLD). > > > > Outside this, the list is but long, in the ALAC Internal of yesterday > > was discussing on the 14 that there is at the moment in > > Calendar !
of "Policy Advice" and the necessity to focus. Them > > I put the list of only 14 to the aims of which somebody can want > > to work one of these, but is going away to have to order To lead it: > > > > 1. Uniform Rapid Suspension > > 2. METRIC TON Clearinghouse > > 3. Post Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedure (PPDRP) > > 4. Registry Restrictions Dispute Resolution Procedure (RRDRP) > > 5. 3 IDN Character > > 6. IDN Variants > > 7. Benchmarking of Registry Operations > > 8. Process of gTLD Registry Agreement Amendments > > 9. Proposed for Framework FY 2011 Operating Plan and Budget > > 10. Draft Report on WHOIS Accuracy > > 11. Global DNS-CERT Business CASE > > 12. Proposed Strategic for Initiatives Improved DNS > > Security, Stability and Resiliency > > 13. Registration Abuse Policies Initial Report. > > 14. Working Group Guidelines > > > > Greetings, > > > > Andrés Piazza > > >>______________!
___________________________________________________ > > > &!
gt;
_______________________________________________
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/44b228fd5e.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list