[ALAC] "Policy" t4ravel slots for Panama

[John Laprise]

Concur

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, 2:52 PM Holly Raiche <h.raiche at internode.on.net>
wrote:

> I agree with Alan - the slots should NOT be for ‘newbies’.  When we start
> work on metrics, the test for people who have been ‘actively participating’
> will be easier to determine.  But, for a start, a history of involvement
> should be the test.  That can include involvement in WGs (ALAC and other
> SO/ACs), in being a pen holder, or contributing to comments on the ALAC
> policy page, involvement in groups such as the Technology Task force,
> Capacity building, etc.  And the involvement can be ICANN attendance as
> well as participation remotely.  I agree with Sean on the point that if
> someone has been actively involved, but not had a travel slot before, they
> should get preference - but the first test is ‘actively involved’.
>
> Holly
>
>
>
> On 20 Mar 2018, at 1:59 am, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
> wrote:
>
> I agree that this is NOT the slot for a "newbie". As the main criteria
> says, it is for someone who already is actively involved but would not
> otherwise be able to attend. Examples that come to mind are Daniel
> Nanghaka, Justine Chew and Abdeldjalil Bachar Bong.
>
> Alan
>
> At 19/03/2018 09:22 AM, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
>
> The policy meeting is usually for policy work, I don't think we should
> have newbie for that. I however suggest that those who have not attended
> ICANN meeting before but have been participating remotely should be given
> priority.
>
> Regards
>
> Sent from my mobile
> Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, 1:49 AM Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca >
> wrote: We have a short time to do the call for travellers for the "policy
> slots".
> Last time, the criteria were summarized in the call for expressions of
> interest as:
>
> There are two travel slots that will be allocated to At-Large participants
> who are ACTIVELY involved in some ICANN policy activity, or those with a
> strong history of such involvement in the past and an interest to restart.
> Those include gNSO or ccNSO PDPs, CCWGs, ALAC support Working Groups and
> the At-Large Review (with a lesser emphasis on the latter). Other slots may
> be opened due to other travellers not being able to attend or not requiring
> full funding.
>
> During the selection, we decided that to the extent practical, we should
> also tried to select people who had not been previously selected. I an
> recommending doing that again, and also, to the extent possible, try to
> identify people who will best benefit from the extensive policy discussions
> we expect in Panama.
> Are there other criteria that we should consider.
> As in the past, the selection will be done by the RALO chairs and me, to
> best identify local talent who need to be favoured.
> The call needs to be made very soon, so please contact me quickly if you
> have input.
> Alan
> _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20180320/2d88dccd/attachment.html>