[ALAC] EPDP Early input

[Marita Moll]

Sorry to have missed the call -- still confusing midnight Monday with 
midnight Tuesday -- I guess I will get used to the format.

I just read this really well done SSAC report which is clear and 
thorough. But there is a lot in there. I wonder if we should do a 
blanket endorsement of everything without careful analysis.

Could we not have a more nuanced position? For example, we could say 
that, in line with our mandate to support end-users, we support SSAC's 
position on ensuring that security professionals and law enforcement 
have adequate access to WHOIS/RDS data.

If that is the point we want to make.

Marita


On 8/28/2018 2:23 AM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
> As I mentioned on the ALAC call that has just completed, all EPDP 
> participant groups have been given the opportunity to provide "early 
> input" into the EPDP.
>
> So far, the SSAC and the NCSG has done so. Their input can be found at 
> https://community.icann.org/x/Ag9pBQ 
> <https://community.icann.org/x/Ag9pBQ>.
>
> The SSAC's input consisted of their recent report SAC101. A copy is 
> attached for your convenience.
>
> I would like to suggest that the ALAC submit a statement saying that 
> we support SAC101, as it is in line with our stated position of trying 
> to ensure that security professionals and law enforcement have 
> adequate access to WHOIS/RDS data.
>
> I open the floor for discussion and will initiate a Consensus Call 
> later in the week.
>
> Alan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20180828/af6f2d1c/attachment.html>