[ALAC] What to cover re GDPR in the HIT sessions?

Fri Aug 10 08:18:21 UTC 2018

Maureen,

The proposed combination of topics 1, 2, 8, 9 and 13 makes a lot of sens for me since they are overlapping / related, and can be done in 120 minutes session in my opinion. Donna gave a good dispatching that may be improved.

If we call « Topic 0 » this combined session (including topics 1, 2, 8, 9 and 13), I will then propose:
Topic 0
Topic 3
Topic 12 

If the combination is not accepted, then I will rank my preferences as follow:
Topic 3
Topic 9
Topic 12 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tijani BEN JEMAA
Executive Director
Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI)
Phone: +216 98 330 114
             +216 52 385 114
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

> Le 10 août 2018 à 08:42, Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
> Hi Seun
> 
> The document came from Donna Austin who is coordinating the GDPR sessions. 
> 
> The option you have selected is a combination of the topics 1,2, 8, 9, 13 - that Donna gave as an option and our top 3 items are included in this list,  
> 
> But they are all big items, can 5 topics be covered in one session?
> 
> As soon as I get these ALAC priorities organised (and anyone on this list can respond), I will pass it on to  Alan who can provide an appropriate response to send to  Donna on our behalf by Tuesday's meeting.
> 
> M
> 
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 6:24 PM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com <mailto:seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hello Maureen,
> 
> I don't know who wrote the attached document but I like the first option which suggests a combination of a couple of related topics and that would be my preference.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Sent from my mobile
> Kindly excuse brevity and typos
> 
> On Fri, 10 Aug 2018, 01:53 Maureen Hilyard, <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com <mailto:maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi all
> 
> Attached is a list of topics from which the SO/AC chairs are considering a final list for inclusion into ICANN63 HIT slots.
> 
> Can you send me what you consider would be your top 2-3 topics? Not possible to cover everything. Id like to survey what the ALAC considers should be our suggested list (within the next 2-3 days?)
> 
> M
> 
> Austin, Donna via SOAC-Leaders-ICANNMeeting-Planning
> Aug 8 (2 days ago)
> 
> to SOAC-Leaders-I.
> Hi Everyone
>  
> Following on from the Planning Committee Meeting last week, where I agreed that I would reach out to those that submitted GDPR related topic proposals to see if we could find a way to rationalize these sessions in some way, unfortunately I have to report that I have not had much success. I reached out to those that had submitted the GDPR related sessions to see if there was some way that we could consolidate five of the proposed topics (see attached), but have yet to receive any response so I’ll put this down to ‘that time of year’. Understanding that there is some urgency to resolve this to enable us to move forward with the planning for Barcelona I have attached the proposal that I developed.
>  
> I also contacted Bruce Tonkin to see if he would be available to moderate/facilitate a consolidated session and he is available if that is something folks want to consider.
>  
> I also spoke to Tanzie and there is some flexibility in the schedule, for example, it might be possible to schedule a 2 hour session on Wednesday from 10.00 to 12.00, but my strong preference would be to have a 90 minute session as I think 2 hours is probably too much. Perhaps another option, if those that submitted the proposals don’t want to combine their sessions, is to allocate 30 minute slots (that would mean cutting one of the sessions). Of course that doesn’t really help overcome the problem of reducing the number of Topic Proposals to fit the number of slots available.
>  
> In thinking about the meeting schedule from a holistic perspective, it’s my personal opinion that 7 sessions devoted to GDPR is too many. There’s no doubt that it is a ‘hot topic’, but we should be mindful that there are a number of other efforts and issues that also require some air time as well and with limited time available we should be respectful of the large number of community members that will be attending the meeting that may have no interest in the topic.
>  
> I’m not sure what our next steps are for winnowing down the Topic Proposals. Perhaps Tanzie can remind us.
>  
> Thanks everyone.
>  
> Donna
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac>
> 
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/>
> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC) <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
> 
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20180810/4a29547b/attachment.html>