[ALAC] Improving Contractual Compliance

[Carlton Samuels]

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Evan Leibovitch <evan at telly.org> wrote:

> Having said that, it is fully possible that the problem lies not in the
> unwillingness of Compliance to act, but with the massively limited scope in
> which they can act. If the RAA enables certain forms of registrant or
> end-user abuse, the compliance team can't really do much to curtail it. And
> certain tools that the end-user community had hoped might come about --
> notably, the so-called Public Interest Commitments -- have turned out to be
> nearly useless.
>
> What is (and has long been) badly needed is honesty and clarity. What is
> in scope for compliance and what isn't. Where ICANN can intervene and where
> its hands are tied. Diligence to act where it can, a commitment to at least
> decent publicly-targeted education in areas in which is constrained, and
> the research needed to recommend rule changes to close loopholes.
>
> - Evan
>

​There, you have it!

First, deal with the scope bit with honesty and clarity.  Then lets knock
heads and see what we must track to measure and gauge - that is to say,
indicators, data, metrics and process -, how we measure compliance and what
we do to effect compliance.​

​-Carlton​


==============================
*Carlton A Samuels*

*Mobile: 876-818-1799Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment &
Turnaround*
=============================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20170411/e00ea60e/attachment.html>