[ALAC] Fwd: ICANN57 - High Interest Topics - Next Steps

Tue Sep 20 16:31:47 UTC 2016

Dear Alan, all

See below in blue/ italic, my points
Thank you and kind regards to all.

Vanda Scartezini
Polo Consultores Associados
Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004
01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253
Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464
Sorry for any typos.

De: alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] En nombre de Alan Greenberg
Enviado el: martes, 20 de septiembre de 2016 12:34 a.m.
Para: ALAC <alac at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Asunto: [ALAC] Fwd: ICANN57 - High Interest Topics - Next Steps

See the following message. An extension to Friday has been requested and I hope will be honoured. See my following very hastily prepared comments. Let me know how they match yours.  Alan

1. DNS and Content Regulation
        1 This session does not seem to allow for significant audience participation and I beleive some of the premises are false. Agree, no need

2. gTLD Marketplace Health index
        2 Unclear if the session is on the marketplace or the index and I think more prep is needed prior to this being a high interest session. I do not see aditional velue on what we have now. Could be aprt of the several gTLD meeting during the week

3. How to do outreach within each SO/AC
        3 Could be of interest if only to demonstrate the differences between groups and what outreach means to each. Coordinate effort may help to have more effective outcome.

4. ICANN Contribution to the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda
        1 Although I personally would find this interesting, I am not sure it is really within the ICANN mandate nor would be of general interest. I am quite involved even teaching at the MBA in Sao Paulo University here but agree not for ICANN’s priority right now, at least.

5. ICANN Support for Multistakeholder Initiatives for Advancing Online Child Protection
        3 Although the format is not detailed, this topic is very much in line with ALAC concerns about the lack of controls on new gTLDs. Agree, focus on end users regarding  new gTLDs is under ALAC’s core.

6. Internet Governance - Public Session
        3 I would support this. Fragmantation is an issue that will be of increasing interest, particularly if the IANA transition does not go through. We normally have Internet Governance session in ICANN meetings specially when close to IGF meetings to try to coordinate our participation. With IGF 6-9 December in Mexico I beleive will be relevant to have such coordination session.

7. Mitigation of Abuse in gTLDs
        3 Again, no indication of session format, but presuming an opportunity for audience participation I think that this would be of interest to us. Agree, abuse in gTLDs is a matter of concerning of end users, again our core business.

8. Operational session on KPIs, regarding ICANN's reach, spending, and engagement strategies
        ? I don't have a dgood feeling for this one. This focus is technical stuff to encourage ISPs, for instance, to use KPIs. Not our priority

9. Public Interest
        3 Definitely - Agree

10. The role of the No-Commercial stakeholders within ICANN. A dialogue to foster understanding and co-operation within ICANN.
        1 This description talks about non-commercial stakeholders within ICANN, but seems to focus purely within the GNSO. If indeed it was wider than that, I would support it. If it is not wider we should push to be. It is important inside and outside GNSO

11. Transparency on legal advice given to ICANN [to preserve its principles and openness
        3 I would support this, although I am dubious on the outcomes. There are several complains about tranparency on legal issues but I can ask, it is possible to have same transparency as we expect on budget , for instance? I doubt , it can cause more damage than benefice to our community as a whole. I could attend to ask for precaution on transparency regarding legal issues not to advocate more transparency.

12. Underserved Regions in ICANN
        3 Again no info on session format, but the topic could be of interest. I am in favor of this one - having studying new gTLds in the region and possible next round, there are many many issues that need  more attention. New gTLds are enlarging the gap for uderserved regions comparing to well served ones. My only point is avoid talking about lack of telecom and energy as some love to raise, since this is not under ICANN’s mission and just waste our time.

13. Universal Consumer Awareness about the largest ever expansion of the Internet
        3 I agreed tat the ALAC would partiicpate in this session, but explicitly said we would not likely support a Ry request for ICANN to embark on a program to support growth in use of new gTLDs. As I said above – item 12 - , there are lots of problems regarding new gTLds in our regions and, as by my study, a real lack of awareness about the problems when consumers join new gTLDs in some underserved regions.
Anyway, Awareness shall be a point to take into consideration and the way each region will deal to develepo such effort can be substantially diverse. I support the idea of discuss awareness.

14. Update on WHOIS-Related Initiatives
        3 There is so much going on that such an update would be of use. Agree

15. What ICANN does not do and why!
        3 I like the idea! Yes! this conversation is running here and I beleive is quite important to clearly difine ICANN’s mission limits.
This will save us a lot of time! This session should be mandatory and available to anyone to use , in order to raise awareness around the globe.

From: David Olive <david.olive at icann.org<mailto:david.olive at icann.org>>
To: Katrina Sataki <katrina at nic.lv<mailto:katrina at nic.lv>>, "thomas.schneider at bakom.admin.ch<mailto:thomas.schneider at bakom.admin.ch>"
         <thomas.schneider at bakom.admin.ch<mailto:thomas.schneider at bakom.admin.ch>>, "paf at netnod.se<mailto:paf at netnod.se>" <paf at netnod.se<mailto:paf at netnod.se>>, "James M.
 Bladel" <jbladel at godaddy.com<mailto:jbladel at godaddy.com>>, "louie at louie.net<mailto:louie at louie.net>" <louie at louie.net<mailto:louie at louie.net>>,
         "tsinha at umd.edu<mailto:tsinha at umd.edu>" <tsinha at umd.edu<mailto:tsinha at umd.edu>>, "bverd at verisign.com<mailto:bverd at verisign.com>" <bverd at verisign.com<mailto:bverd at verisign.com>>,
         "alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca<mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>" <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca<mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>>,
         "tonyarholmes at btinternet.com<mailto:tonyarholmes at btinternet.com>" <tonyarholmes at btinternet.com<mailto:tonyarholmes at btinternet.com>>,
         "gregshatanipc at gmail.com<mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>" <gregshatanipc at gmail.com<mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>>, "hilaliaziz at yahoo.fr<mailto:hilaliaziz at yahoo.fr>"
         <hilaliaziz at yahoo.fr<mailto:hilaliaziz at yahoo.fr>>, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com<mailto:ocl at gih.com>>,
         "tapani.tarvainen at effi.org<mailto:tapani.tarvainen at effi.org>" <tapani.tarvainen at effi.org<mailto:tapani.tarvainen at effi.org>>,
         "'mcknight.glenn at gmail.com'" <mcknight.glenn at gmail.com<mailto:mcknight.glenn at gmail.com>>, Paul Diaz
         <pdiaz at pir.org<mailto:pdiaz at pir.org>>, "sb at inapp.com<mailto:sb at inapp.com>" <sb at inapp.com<mailto:sb at inapp.com>>, "cwilson at 21cf.com<mailto:cwilson at 21cf.com>"
         <cwilson at 21cf.com<mailto:cwilson at 21cf.com>>, Klaus Stoll <klaus.stoll at gkpfoundation.org<mailto:klaus.stoll at gkpfoundation.org>>, Rafik Dammak
         <rafik.dammak at gmail.com<mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>, "gbunton at tucows.com<mailto:gbunton at tucows.com>" <gbunton at tucows.com<mailto:gbunton at tucows.com>>, "Oscar
 Robles" <oscar at lacnic.net<mailto:oscar at lacnic.net>>, "hcarrascob at gmail.com<mailto:hcarrascob at gmail.com>" <hcarrascob at gmail.com<mailto:hcarrascob at gmail.com>>
CC: Nick Tomasso <nick.tomasso at icann.org<mailto:nick.tomasso at icann.org>>, "Tanzanica S. King"
         <tanzanica.king at icann.org<mailto:tanzanica.king at icann.org>>
Subject: ICANN57 -  High Interest Topics - Next Steps
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 21:34:58 +0000

A message from the Meetings team asking for your inputs.

Regards David

---------------------------------------------------------------
Dear SO-AC Leaders:

A total of 15 potential topics for high-interest session slots have been identified by your groups for ICANN57 in Hyderabad. With just seven slots available for these, we’d like to invite you to take one more step towards finalizing topics for the meeting.Â

Please see details for the potential topics at https://meetings.icann.org/en/hitreviews
and a corresponding review form atÂ  https://icann.wufoo.com/forms/icann57-hit-proposal-review-form/.

As noted on the form, please use the following high-interest session criteria to support your selections:

- Topic has potential to attract a large audience (200+) and be of interest across most, if not all SO/ACs.
- Proposed format allows for adequate audience participation within a 75-90 minute session slot.
- Topic has clear goals and objectives which are closely aligned with ICANN’s mission and core values.

Your responses will be used to identify seven (7) topics for the main meeting room high-interest session slots.

Please submit your reviews as soon as possible but no later than EOD 18 September.

Tanzanica S. King
Sr. Manager, Meeting Strategy and Design
ICANN

OfficeÂ Â  +1 310 301 5800
MobileÂ  +1 310 995 3038
EmailÂ Â Â  king at icann.org<mailto:king at icann.org>
www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org/>

________________________________
[vast logo]<https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca de virus.
www.avast.com<https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20160920/ada54237/attachment.html>