[ALAC] Topics for the ALAC-Board meeting

[Seun Ojedeji]

Hi,

I agree it's quite heavy as well. I will suggest bringing new gtld before
new meeting strategy and then we treat in that order.

Regards

Sent from my LG G4
Kindly excuse brevity and typos
On 2 Mar 2016 5:06 p.m., "Tijani BEN JEMAA" <tijani.benjemaa at benjemaa.com>
wrote:

> All these points in 60 minutes??? I find it too heavy.
> I suggest to remove the new meeting strategy point and the one of
> annual « special » requests for the following reasons:
>
>    - the new meeting strategy didn’t start yet: the first experience is
>    Marrakech, and I don’t find meeting A too different from meetings of
>    the « old »  strategy. So, we will spend time assessing and reviewing when
>    we will make a full cycle (Meetings A, B, and C).
>    - The importance of the multi-year planning for summits and GAs made
>    me propose to remove the second sub-bullet point. I think that raising the
>    special request one will dilute the subject and reduce the value of the
>    first sub-bullet point. Also, we have a year before the next « special »
>    request, so it is not urgent.
>
>
> I also suggest to define a time division for the remaining points. I
> propose:
>
>
>    - feedback on the final report of the CCWG on Accountability
>
>
> Sensitive New gTLDs - GAC Category 1, Safeguards 1-8
> Budget issues: Multi-year GA and Summit planning
> Consumer Trust
> Diversity is considered to be a challenge in ICANN. How is your SO/AC
> doing with regard to enhancing diversity in all its dimensions? What can
> ICANN do to support that effort?
>
>
>    - What is your feedback on the final report of the CCWG on
>    Accountability?
>
>
>
>
>
> Le 2 mars 2016 à 05:03, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> a écrit
> :
>
> The topics that we supplied to them were:
>
>
>    - CCWG Accountability - if necessary based on status at the time of
>    the Board-ALAC meeting
>    - Sensitive New gTLDs - GAC Category 1, Safeguards 1-8
>    - Budget issues:
>       - Multi-year GA and Summit planning
>       - Annual "special" requests we should not have to make
>    - New Meeting Strategy - issues and suggestions
>    - Consumer Trust
>
>
> The 2nd sub-bullet on budgets is a combination of the special request we
> made to bypass ICANN bureaucracy (not being able to use approved budget
> flexibly and having to beg to have adequate translation tools) and the
> issue of having to make a "special" request to train leaders and have them
> work effectively.
>
> The Board has, for the first time in several years, raised issues for our
> input.
>
>
>    - Diversity is considered to be a challenge in ICANN. How is your
>    SO/AC doing with regard to enhancing diversity in all its dimensions? What
>    can ICANN do to support that effort?
>    - What is your feedback on the final report of the CCWG on
>    Accountability?
>
>
> Clearly the 2nd one overlaps with our first bullet.
>
> We will spend some time on the weekend discussing how we will address
> these issues.
>
> Alan
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20160302/957d96c8/attachment.html>