<p dir="ltr">Hi,</p>
<p dir="ltr">I agree it's quite heavy as well. I will suggest bringing new gtld before new meeting strategy and then we treat in that order.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Regards</p>
<p dir="ltr">Sent from my LG G4<br>
Kindly excuse brevity and typos</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 2 Mar 2016 5:06 p.m., "Tijani BEN JEMAA" <<a href="mailto:tijani.benjemaa@benjemaa.com">tijani.benjemaa@benjemaa.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><font color="#002e7a">All these points in 60 minutes??? I find it too heavy. </font><div><font color="#002e7a">I suggest to remove the new meeting strategy point and the one of annual « special » requests for the following reasons:</font></div><div><ul><li><font color="#002e7a">the new meeting strategy didn’t start yet: the first experience is Marrakech, and I don’t find meeting A too different from meetings of the « old » strategy. So, we will spend time assessing and reviewing when we will make a full cycle (Meetings A, B, and C).</font></li><li><font color="#002e7a">The importance of the multi-year planning for summits and GAs made me propose to remove the second sub-bullet point. I think that raising the special request one will dilute the subject and reduce the value of the first sub-bullet point. Also, we have a year before the next « special » request, so it is not urgent.</font></li></ul><div><font color="#002e7a"><br></font></div><div><font color="#002e7a">I also suggest to define a time division for the remaining points. I propose:</font></div><div><br></div><div><blockquote type="cite"><div><ul><li>feedback on the final report of the CCWG on Accountability</li></ul></div></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>Sensitive New gTLDs - GAC Category 1, Safeguards 1-8 </div><div>Budget issues: Multi-year GA and Summit planning </div><div>Consumer Trust</div><div>Diversity is considered to be a challenge in ICANN. How is your SO/AC doing with regard to enhancing diversity in all its dimensions? What can ICANN do to support that effort?</div><div><blockquote type="cite"><div><ul><li>What is your feedback on the final report of the CCWG on Accountability?</li></ul></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><div><font color="#002e7a"> </font></div><div><blockquote type="cite"><div>Le 2 mars 2016 à 05:03, Alan Greenberg <<a href="mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca" target="_blank">alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca</a>> a écrit :</div><br><div>
<div>
The topics that we supplied to them were:<br><br>
<ul>
<li>CCWG Accountability - if necessary based on status at the time of the
Board-ALAC meeting
</li><li>Sensitive New gTLDs - GAC Category 1, Safeguards 1-8
</li><li>Budget issues:
<ul>
<li>Multi-year GA and Summit planning
</li><li>Annual "special" requests we should not have to make
</li></ul>
</li><li>New Meeting Strategy - issues and suggestions
</li><li>Consumer Trust
</li></ul><br>
The 2nd sub-bullet on budgets is a combination of the special request we
made to bypass ICANN bureaucracy (not being able to use approved budget
flexibly and having to beg to have adequate translation tools) and the
issue of having to make a "special" request to train leaders
and have them work effectively.<br><br>
The Board has, for the first time in several years, raised issues for our
input.<br><br>
<ul>
<li>Diversity is considered to be a challenge in ICANN. How is your SO/AC
doing with regard to enhancing diversity in all its dimensions? What can
ICANN do to support that effort?
</li><li>What is your feedback on the final report of the CCWG on
Accountability?
</li></ul><br>
Clearly the 2nd one overlaps with our first bullet.<br><br>
We will spend some time on the weekend discussing how we will address
these issues.<br><br>
Alan<br><br>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>ALAC mailing list<br><a href="mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org" target="_blank">ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a><br><a href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac" target="_blank">https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac</a><br><br>At-Large Online: <a href="http://www.atlarge.icann.org" target="_blank">http://www.atlarge.icann.org</a><br>ALAC Working Wiki: <a href="https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)" target="_blank">https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)</a></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
ALAC mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org">ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac</a><br>
<br>
At-Large Online: <a href="http://www.atlarge.icann.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.atlarge.icann.org</a><br>
ALAC Working Wiki: <a href="https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)</a><br></blockquote></div>