[ALAC] Call for Volunteers to Review Two Public Comment Proceedings

[gbruen at knujon.com]

If we're truly bottom up, we should not follow a pattern (even in formality) of having the staff lead


------Original Message------
From: Alan Greenberg
To: gbruen at knujon.com
To: Ariel Liang
To: ALAC
Subject: Re: [ALAC] Call for Volunteers to Review Two Public Comment Proceedings
Sent: Nov 6, 2015 15:25

In the past, such messages would generally start with "On behalf of 
Alan Greenberg, Chair of the At-Large Advisory Committee..."

I find that too wordy (and a bit pompous). But if you think that 
omitting it is confusing, it can be added back.

Alan

At 06/11/2015 03:08 PM, gbruen at knujon.com wrote:
>I am confused. Is staff or ALAC calling for this? Who is the "we"?
>
>Thanks
>
>
>Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang at icann.org>
>Sender: alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 20:04:54
>To: alac at atlarge-lists.icann.org<alac at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>Cc: Alan Greenberg<alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
>Subject: [ALAC] Call for Volunteers to Review Two Public Comment Proceedings
>
>_______________________________________________
>ALAC mailing list
>ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
>At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>ALAC Working Wiki: 
>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)


Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry