[ALAC] Questions on Accountability Proposals
Sébastien Bachollet
sebastien at bachollet.com
Mon Jun 1 17:29:13 UTC 2015
Hello all,
I get you point Olivier.
But our only weapon to gain something in the discussion is to express the
possibility that we will not agree.
If At-Large says, anyhow we will agree, unfortunately we don¹t have much
forces.
All the best
Sébastien Bachollet
+33 6 07 66 89 33
Blog: http://sebastien.bachollet.fr/
Mail: Sébastien Bachollet <sebastien at bachollet.com>
De : Olivier Crépin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>
Date : lundi 1 juin 2015 19:07
À : Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>, Maureen Hilyard
<maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>
Cc : ALAC <alac at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Objet : Re: [ALAC] Questions on Accountability Proposals
>
> Hello all,
>
> it is exactly for this reason that I selected "No". The Accountability
> Process is so important that I would not risk jeopardizing it for something as
> unworkable and as unlikely as this.
> Kind regards,
>
> Olivier
>
>
> Le 31/05/2015 19:29, Alan Greenberg a écrit :
>
>
>> Perhaps the logic is similar, but the implications if the ALAC were to take
>> such a position an possibly jeopardize the accountability measures being
>> adopted and thus the IANA transition are not insignificant.
>>
>> Alan
>>
>> At 31/05/2015 01:00 PM, Maureen Hilyard wrote:
>>
>>> Not exactly opposite, Alan. Olivier did qualify his NO response with " I see
>>> no particular harm in a call for something that will, in practice, likely
>>> neither work, nor ever be used. If we reach the need for legal
>>> enforceability, it means ICANN really is in trouble." which prompted my
>>> "Well, What's the point.."
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 6:43 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca >
>>> wrote:
>>> Murray, You cannot fully support the comments of Maureen and Olivier
>>> because they answered exactly oppositely to Q3.
>>>
>>> Alan
>>>
>>> At 31/05/2015 12:15 PM, Murray McKercher wrote:
>>>
>>>> 1. Yes, 2. No 3. Yes
>>>>
>>>> I fully support the comments made by Olivier and Maureen.
>>>>
>>>> Consensus consultation and transparency provide the foundation for
>>>> democratic process. If ICANN is serious in its dedication to creating a
>>>> democratic global governance system, then commitment to consensus
>>>> consultation and transparency is key. Substantive movement towards
>>>> confrontational legalistic processes may undermine the strategic goals of
>>>> the organisation and the spirit to which the volunteers are committed.
>>>>
>>>> Murray McKercher
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Saturday, May 30, 2015 10:14 PM, Alan Greenberg
>>>> <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, No and No.
>>>>
>>>> At 30/05/2015 10:04 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> >1. Do you believe that failing anything else, we must have the
>>>>> >ability to remove parts of or all of the Board?
>>>>> >
>>>>> >2. With the exception of Board member removal, do we need legal
>>>>> >enforceability of can we rely on good faith (and Board member
>>>>> >removal if you supported that).
>>>>> >
>>>>> >3. If the final CCWG proposal calls for full legal enforceability,
>>>>> >is that sufficient reason for the ALAC to not ratify it?
>>>>> >
>>>>> >Alan
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> ALAC mailing list
>>>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>>> <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac>
>>>>
>>>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>>>> <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/>
>>>> ALAC Working Wiki:
>>>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+
>>>> (ALAC)
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ALAC mailing list
>>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>> <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac>
>>>
>>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>>> ALAC Working Wiki:
>>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA
>>> C)
>>> <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+%28
>>> ALAC%29>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ALAC mailing list
>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/
>> alac
>>
>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>> ALAC Working Wiki:
>>
https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC>>
)
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online:
> http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20150601/c859c651/attachment.html>
More information about the ALAC
mailing list