[ALAC] Questions on Accountability Proposals
Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
ocl at gih.com
Mon Jun 1 17:07:54 UTC 2015
Hello all,
it is exactly for this reason that I selected "No". The Accountability
Process is so important that I would not risk jeopardizing it for
something as unworkable and as unlikely as this.
Kind regards,
Olivier
Le 31/05/2015 19:29, Alan Greenberg a écrit :
> Perhaps the logic is similar, but the implications if the ALAC were to
> take such a position an possibly jeopardize the accountability
> measures being adopted and thus the IANA transition are not insignificant.
>
> Alan
>
> At 31/05/2015 01:00 PM, Maureen Hilyard wrote:
>> Not exactly opposite, Alan. Olivier did qualify his NO response with
>> " I see no particular harm in a call for something that will, in
>> practice, likely neither work, nor ever be used. If we reach the
>> need for legal enforceability, it means ICANN really is in trouble."
>> which prompted my "Well, What's the point.."
>>
>> On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 6:43 AM, Alan Greenberg
>> <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca <mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> > wrote:
>>
>> Murray, You cannot fully support the comments of Maureen and
>> Olivier because they answered exactly oppositely to Q3.
>>
>> Alan
>>
>> At 31/05/2015 12:15 PM, Murray McKercher wrote:
>>> 1. Yes, 2. No 3. Yes
>>>
>>> I fully support the comments made by Olivier and Maureen.
>>>
>>> Consensus consultation and transparency provide the
>>> foundation for democratic process. If ICANN is serious in
>>> its dedication to creating a democratic global governance
>>> system, then commitment to consensus consultation and
>>> transparency is key. Substantive movement towards
>>> confrontational legalistic processes may undermine the
>>> strategic goals of the organisation and the spirit to which
>>> the volunteers are committed.
>>>
>>> Murray McKercher
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Saturday, May 30, 2015 10:14 PM, Alan Greenberg
>>> <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca <mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, No and No.
>>>
>>> At 30/05/2015 10:04 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
>>>
>>> >1. Do you believe that failing anything else, we must have the
>>> >ability to remove parts of or all of the Board?
>>> >
>>> >2. With the exception of Board member removal, do we need
>>> legal
>>> >enforceability of can we rely on good faith (and Board member
>>> >removal if you supported that).
>>> >
>>> >3. If the final CCWG proposal calls for full legal
>>> enforceability,
>>> >is that sufficient reason for the ALAC to not ratify it?
>>> >
>>> >Alan
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ALAC mailing list
>>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>> <mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>> <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac>
>>>
>>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>>> <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/>
>>> ALAC Working Wiki:
>>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+
>>> (ALAC)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ALAC mailing list
>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>> <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac>
>>
>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>> ALAC Working Wiki:
>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>> <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+%28ALAC%29>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20150601/71c71393/attachment.html>
More information about the ALAC
mailing list