[ALAC] Discussion: CWG-Stewardship role in implementation

[Barrack Otieno]

Many thanks Allan,

The letter is good.

Regards
On Dec 3, 2015 1:26 PM, "wafa" <wafa at ati.tn> wrote:

>
> I totally support
>
> Le 03/12/2015 08:00, Maureen Hilyard a écrit :
>
> +1
> On 2/12/2015 7:06 pm, "León Felipe Sánchez Ambía" <leonfelipe at sanchez.mx>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Alan. I fully support the decision.
>>
>> Kind regards ,
>>
>>
>> León
>>
>> El 2 dic 2015, a las 10:53 PM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
>> escribió:
>>
>> Given that this was explicitly supported by a number of ALAC members and
>> objected to by none (with one ALAC Member believing that the charter should
>> be explicitly changed), I will report to the CWG- Stewardship at its
>> meeting tomorrow that the ALAC supports the plan.
>>
>> Alan
>>
>>
>>
>> At 16/11/2015 10:45 AM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
>>
>> Please see following message.
>>
>> I believe this makes sense. If anyone has concerns with this, please let
>> us know. Based on any negative comments, I will initiate a Consensus Call
>> or formal vote next Monday, 23 November. The Consensus Call or vote will be
>> for ALAC Members only, but of course, the discussion is open to anyone on
>> this list.
>>
>> Alan
>>
>> To: ALAC, CCNSO, GAC, GNSO, SSAC
>> Cc: CWG-Stewardship, ICG, CRISP, IANAPLAN, CCWG-Accountability, ICANN
>> Implementation & ICANN Policy Staff.
>>
>>
>> Dear Chartering Organizations of the CWG IANA Stewardship,
>>
>>
>> *Subject: CWG-Stewardship role in implementation *
>> At ICANN54 in Dublin, the IANA Stewardship Coordination Group (ICG)
>> confirmed designation of the operational communities to be responsible for
>> direct implementation oversight of their proposals.
>>
>> The CWG-Stewardship also met during the course of ICANN54 and discussed
>> this role and we continued this discussion in a subsequent meeting on
>> Thursday 5 November 2015. An oversight role is not specifically detailed in
>> our Charter, but it is the CWG-Stewardship?s view that our role in
>> implementation is to ensure that the implementation is consistent with the
>> CWG-Stewardship Final Proposal and furthermore, to provide input on the
>> implementation work when required by staff working on the implementation
>> or, if and when necessary, to bring the implementation work back in line
>> with the intent of the Final Proposal.
>>
>> In our view, the most logical option is to have the CWG-Stewardship
>> working group continue in its current form and with the responsibility to
>> monitor the implementation and provide input where needed. Of course, this
>> responsibility would include regular updates to the Chartering
>> Organizations via the appointed members as well as consultations with the
>> Chartering Organizations should issues be identified that are deemed
>> without this specific remit.
>>
>> We note here for your information, that while the CWG-Stewardship Final
>> Proposal was submitted in June 2015, the CWG-Stewardship has remained
>> active and therefore available when needed. This has included being
>> available to answer questions from the ICG, or to monitor the
>> CCWG-Accountability dependencies and to coordinate with the other
>> operational communities on shared issues such as IANA intellectual property
>> rights.
>>
>> As the CWG-Stewardship Charter does not specifically address
>> implementation, we would like to ensure that the CWG-Stewardship?s proposed
>> approach in relation to implementation is not inconsistent with the intent
>> of the Chartering Organizations concerning the scope and role of the
>> CWG-Stewardship. We therefore propose to proceed to oversee the
>> implementation work as described above unless there are objections from one
>> or more Chartering Organizations.
>>
>> We would like to emphasize that the CWG-Stewardship does not intend to
>> change its working methods in light of this ongoing role. The group will
>> remain open to anyone who wishes to join, and we will welcome informed
>> individuals with relevant implementation and operational experience to join
>> the CWG-Stewardship in this next phase.
>>
>> Thank you for your consideration of this matter and for your ongoing
>> support of our work. Please let us know of any concerns by no later than 30
>> November 2015.
>>
>> Jonathan Robinson & Lise Fuhr
>> CWG-Stewardship co-Chairs
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ALAC mailing list
>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>
>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>> ALAC Working Wiki:
>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC
>> <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+%28ALAC>
>> )
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ALAC mailing list
>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>
>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>> ALAC Working Wiki:
>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>> <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+%28ALAC%29>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ALAC mailing list
>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>
>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>> ALAC Working Wiki:
>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>> <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+%28ALAC%29>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing listALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20151203/166601c1/attachment.html>