[ALAC] Discussion: CWG-Stewardship role in implementation
wafa
wafa at ati.tn
Thu Dec 3 10:25:47 UTC 2015
I totally support
Le 03/12/2015 08:00, Maureen Hilyard a écrit :
>
> +1
>
> On 2/12/2015 7:06 pm, "León Felipe Sánchez Ambía"
> <leonfelipe at sanchez.mx <mailto:leonfelipe at sanchez.mx>> wrote:
>
> Thanks Alan. I fully support the decision.
>
> Kind regards ,
>
>
> León
>
> El 2 dic 2015, a las 10:53 PM, Alan Greenberg
> <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca <mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>> escribió:
>
>> Given that this was explicitly supported by a number of ALAC
>> members and objected to by none (with one ALAC Member believing
>> that the charter should be explicitly changed), I will report to
>> the CWG- Stewardship at its meeting tomorrow that the ALAC
>> supports the plan.
>>
>> Alan
>>
>>
>>
>> At 16/11/2015 10:45 AM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
>>> Please see following message.
>>>
>>> I believe this makes sense. If anyone has concerns with this,
>>> please let us know. Based on any negative comments, I will
>>> initiate a Consensus Call or formal vote next Monday, 23
>>> November. The Consensus Call or vote will be for ALAC Members
>>> only, but of course, the discussion is open to anyone on this list.
>>>
>>> Alan
>>>
>>>> To: ALAC, CCNSO, GAC, GNSO, SSAC
>>>> Cc: CWG-Stewardship, ICG, CRISP, IANAPLAN, CCWG-Accountability,
>>>> ICANN Implementation & ICANN Policy Staff.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dear Chartering Organizations of the CWG IANA Stewardship,
>>>>
>>>> *Subject: CWG-Stewardship role in implementation
>>>> *
>>>> At ICANN54 in Dublin, the IANA Stewardship Coordination Group
>>>> (ICG) confirmed designation of the operational communities to
>>>> be responsible for direct implementation oversight of their
>>>> proposals.
>>>>
>>>> The CWG-Stewardship also met during the course of ICANN54 and
>>>> discussed this role and we continued this discussion in a
>>>> subsequent meeting on Thursday 5 November 2015. An oversight
>>>> role is not specifically detailed in our Charter, but it is the
>>>> CWG-Stewardship?s view that our role in implementation is to
>>>> ensure that the implementation is consistent with the
>>>> CWG-Stewardship Final Proposal and furthermore, to provide
>>>> input on the implementation work when required by staff working
>>>> on the implementation or, if and when necessary, to bring the
>>>> implementation work back in line with the intent of the Final
>>>> Proposal.
>>>>
>>>> In our view, the most logical option is to have the
>>>> CWG-Stewardship working group continue in its current form and
>>>> with the responsibility to monitor the implementation and
>>>> provide input where needed. Of course, this responsibility
>>>> would include regular updates to the Chartering Organizations
>>>> via the appointed members as well as consultations with the
>>>> Chartering Organizations should issues be identified that are
>>>> deemed without this specific remit.
>>>>
>>>> We note here for your information, that while the
>>>> CWG-Stewardship Final Proposal was submitted in June 2015, the
>>>> CWG-Stewardship has remained active and therefore available
>>>> when needed. This has included being available to answer
>>>> questions from the ICG, or to monitor the CCWG-Accountability
>>>> dependencies and to coordinate with the other operational
>>>> communities on shared issues such as IANA intellectual property
>>>> rights.
>>>>
>>>> As the CWG-Stewardship Charter does not specifically address
>>>> implementation, we would like to ensure that the
>>>> CWG-Stewardship?s proposed approach in relation to
>>>> implementation is not inconsistent with the intent of the
>>>> Chartering Organizations concerning the scope and role of the
>>>> CWG-Stewardship. We therefore propose to proceed to oversee the
>>>> implementation work as described above unless there are
>>>> objections from one or more Chartering Organizations.
>>>>
>>>> We would like to emphasize that the CWG-Stewardship does not
>>>> intend to change its working methods in light of this ongoing
>>>> role. The group will remain open to anyone who wishes to join,
>>>> and we will welcome informed individuals with relevant
>>>> implementation and operational experience to join the
>>>> CWG-Stewardship in this next phase.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your consideration of this matter and for your
>>>> ongoing support of our work. Please let us know of any concerns
>>>> by no later than 30 November 2015.
>>>>
>>>> Jonathan Robinson & Lise Fuhr
>>>> CWG-Stewardship co-Chairs
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ALAC mailing list
>>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>>
>>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>>> <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/>
>>> ALAC Working Wiki:
>>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC
>>> <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+%28ALAC>
>>> )
>> _______________________________________________
>> ALAC mailing list
>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>
>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>> ALAC Working Wiki:
>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>> <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+%28ALAC%29>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
> <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+%28ALAC%29>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20151203/a885250e/attachment.html>
More information about the ALAC
mailing list