[ALAC] Discussion: CWG-Stewardship role in implementation

wafa wafa at ati.tn
Thu Dec 3 10:25:47 UTC 2015


I totally support

Le 03/12/2015 08:00, Maureen Hilyard a écrit :
>
> +1
>
> On 2/12/2015 7:06 pm, "León Felipe Sánchez Ambía" 
> <leonfelipe at sanchez.mx <mailto:leonfelipe at sanchez.mx>> wrote:
>
>     Thanks Alan. I fully support the decision.
>
>     Kind regards ,
>
>
>     León
>
>     El 2 dic 2015, a las 10:53 PM, Alan Greenberg
>     <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca <mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>> escribió:
>
>>     Given that this was explicitly supported by a number of ALAC
>>     members and objected to by none (with one ALAC Member believing
>>     that the charter should be explicitly changed), I will report to
>>     the CWG- Stewardship at its meeting tomorrow that the ALAC
>>     supports the plan.
>>
>>     Alan
>>
>>
>>
>>     At 16/11/2015 10:45 AM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
>>>     Please see following message.
>>>
>>>     I believe this makes sense. If anyone has concerns with this,
>>>     please let us know. Based on any negative comments, I will
>>>     initiate a Consensus Call or formal vote next Monday, 23
>>>     November. The Consensus Call or vote will be for ALAC Members
>>>     only, but of course, the discussion is open to anyone on this list.
>>>
>>>     Alan
>>>
>>>>     To: ALAC, CCNSO, GAC, GNSO, SSAC
>>>>     Cc: CWG-Stewardship, ICG, CRISP, IANAPLAN, CCWG-Accountability,
>>>>     ICANN Implementation & ICANN Policy Staff.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     Dear Chartering Organizations of the CWG IANA Stewardship,
>>>>
>>>>     *Subject: CWG-Stewardship role in implementation
>>>>     *
>>>>     At ICANN54 in Dublin, the IANA Stewardship Coordination Group
>>>>     (ICG) confirmed designation of the operational communities to
>>>>     be responsible for direct implementation oversight of their
>>>>     proposals.
>>>>
>>>>     The CWG-Stewardship also met during the course of ICANN54 and
>>>>     discussed this role and we continued this discussion in a
>>>>     subsequent meeting on Thursday 5 November 2015. An oversight
>>>>     role is not specifically detailed in our Charter, but it is the
>>>>     CWG-Stewardship?s view that our role in implementation is to
>>>>     ensure that the implementation is consistent with the
>>>>     CWG-Stewardship Final Proposal and furthermore, to provide
>>>>     input on the implementation work when required by staff working
>>>>     on the implementation or, if and when necessary, to bring the
>>>>     implementation work back in line with the intent of the Final
>>>>     Proposal.
>>>>
>>>>     In our view, the most logical option is to have the
>>>>     CWG-Stewardship working group continue in its current form and
>>>>     with the responsibility to monitor the implementation and
>>>>     provide input where needed. Of course, this responsibility
>>>>     would include regular updates to the Chartering Organizations
>>>>     via the appointed members as well as consultations with the
>>>>     Chartering Organizations should issues be identified that are
>>>>     deemed without this specific remit.
>>>>
>>>>     We note here for your information, that while the
>>>>     CWG-Stewardship Final Proposal was submitted in June 2015, the
>>>>     CWG-Stewardship has remained active and therefore available
>>>>     when needed. This has included being available to answer
>>>>     questions from the ICG, or to monitor the CCWG-Accountability
>>>>     dependencies and to coordinate with the other operational
>>>>     communities on shared issues such as IANA intellectual property
>>>>     rights.
>>>>
>>>>     As the CWG-Stewardship Charter does not specifically address
>>>>     implementation, we would like to ensure that the
>>>>     CWG-Stewardship?s proposed approach in relation to
>>>>     implementation is not inconsistent with the intent of the
>>>>     Chartering Organizations concerning the scope and role of the
>>>>     CWG-Stewardship. We therefore propose to proceed to oversee the
>>>>     implementation work as described above unless there are
>>>>     objections from one or more Chartering Organizations.
>>>>
>>>>     We would like to emphasize that the CWG-Stewardship does not
>>>>     intend to change its working methods in light of this ongoing
>>>>     role. The group will remain open to anyone who wishes to join,
>>>>     and we will welcome informed individuals with relevant
>>>>     implementation and operational experience to join the
>>>>     CWG-Stewardship in this next phase.
>>>>
>>>>     Thank you for your consideration of this matter and for your
>>>>     ongoing support of our work. Please let us know of any concerns
>>>>     by no later than 30 November 2015.
>>>>
>>>>     Jonathan Robinson & Lise Fuhr
>>>>     CWG-Stewardship co-Chairs
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     ALAC mailing list
>>>     ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>>>     https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>>
>>>     At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>>>     <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/>
>>>     ALAC Working Wiki:
>>>     https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC
>>>     <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+%28ALAC>
>>>     )
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     ALAC mailing list
>>     ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>>     https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>
>>     At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>>     ALAC Working Wiki:
>>     https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>>     <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+%28ALAC%29>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     ALAC mailing list
>     ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>     https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
>     At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>     ALAC Working Wiki:
>     https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>     <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+%28ALAC%29>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20151203/a885250e/attachment.html>


More information about the ALAC mailing list