[ALAC] Discussion: CWG-Stewardship role in implementation

[Seun Ojedeji]

This is fine.

Thanks

Sent from my Asus Zenfone2
Kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 3 Dec 2015 05:56, "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:

> Given that this was explicitly supported by a number of ALAC members and
> objected to by none (with one ALAC Member believing that the charter should
> be explicitly changed), I will report to the CWG- Stewardship at its
> meeting tomorrow that the ALAC supports the plan.
>
> Alan
>
>
>
> At 16/11/2015 10:45 AM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
>
> Please see following message.
>
> I believe this makes sense. If anyone has concerns with this, please let
> us know. Based on any negative comments, I will initiate a Consensus Call
> or formal vote next Monday, 23 November. The Consensus Call or vote will be
> for ALAC Members only, but of course, the discussion is open to anyone on
> this list.
>
> Alan
>
> To: ALAC, CCNSO, GAC, GNSO, SSAC
> Cc: CWG-Stewardship, ICG, CRISP, IANAPLAN, CCWG-Accountability, ICANN
> Implementation & ICANN Policy Staff.
>
>
> Dear Chartering Organizations of the CWG IANA Stewardship,
>
>
> *Subject: CWG-Stewardship role in implementation *
> At ICANN54 in Dublin, the IANA Stewardship Coordination Group (ICG)
> confirmed designation of the operational communities to be responsible for
> direct implementation oversight of their proposals.
>
> The CWG-Stewardship also met during the course of ICANN54 and discussed
> this role and we continued this discussion in a subsequent meeting on
> Thursday 5 November 2015. An oversight role is not specifically detailed in
> our Charter, but it is the CWG-Stewardship?s view that our role in
> implementation is to ensure that the implementation is consistent with the
> CWG-Stewardship Final Proposal and furthermore, to provide input on the
> implementation work when required by staff working on the implementation
> or, if and when necessary, to bring the implementation work back in line
> with the intent of the Final Proposal.
>
> In our view, the most logical option is to have the CWG-Stewardship
> working group continue in its current form and with the responsibility to
> monitor the implementation and provide input where needed. Of course, this
> responsibility would include regular updates to the Chartering
> Organizations via the appointed members as well as consultations with the
> Chartering Organizations should issues be identified that are deemed
> without this specific remit.
>
> We note here for your information, that while the CWG-Stewardship Final
> Proposal was submitted in June 2015, the CWG-Stewardship has remained
> active and therefore available when needed. This has included being
> available to answer questions from the ICG, or to monitor the
> CCWG-Accountability dependencies and to coordinate with the other
> operational communities on shared issues such as IANA intellectual property
> rights.
>
> As the CWG-Stewardship Charter does not specifically address
> implementation, we would like to ensure that the CWG-Stewardship?s proposed
> approach in relation to implementation is not inconsistent with the intent
> of the Chartering Organizations concerning the scope and role of the
> CWG-Stewardship. We therefore propose to proceed to oversee the
> implementation work as described above unless there are objections from one
> or more Chartering Organizations.
>
> We would like to emphasize that the CWG-Stewardship does not intend to
> change its working methods in light of this ongoing role. The group will
> remain open to anyone who wishes to join, and we will welcome informed
> individuals with relevant implementation and operational experience to join
> the CWG-Stewardship in this next phase.
>
> Thank you for your consideration of this matter and for your ongoing
> support of our work. Please let us know of any concerns by no later than 30
> November 2015.
>
> Jonathan Robinson & Lise Fuhr
> CWG-Stewardship co-Chairs
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC
> )
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20151203/4a39d2c8/attachment.html>