[ALAC] Follow-up on the ALAC Advice to the Board regarding PICs
Holly Raiche
h.raiche at internode.on.net
Thu Nov 13 20:28:53 UTC 2014
Okay - so we are not voting. I also agree with the proposals suggested by Evan - when he manages the time to incorporate the changes, and the changes suggested by Olivier
Holly
On 14 Nov 2014, at 6:54 am, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe at sanchez.mx> wrote:
> Thanks Alan, Olivier and Evan,
>
> I agree with the proposed changes suggested by Olivier.
>
> Best regards,
>
> León
>> El 13/11/2014, a las 13:44, Evan Leibovitch <evan at telly.org> escribió:
>>
>> OK.
>>
>> I had thought that once the vote started, the draft being voted on was set
>> in stone.
>>
>> The changes Olivier suggests are all reasonable. I'm pressed for time today
>> but will try to do the changes.
>>
>> - Evan
>>
>>
>> On 13 November 2014 14:34, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca <mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>> wrote:
>>
>>> Evan, I believe that all (or most) of the changes that Olivier is
>>> suggesting are cosmetic and do not at all change the intent or meaning of
>>> the statement. If I had more time, I probably would have caught most last
>>> night. Please try to make these changes and I will get it reported (and a
>>> formal note of explanation to the ALAC) when I return in a few hours.
>>>
>>> Alan
>>>
>>> At 13/11/2014 01:57 PM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 13 November 2014 11:28, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com <mailto:ocl at gih.com>> wrote:
>>> Dear Alan,
>>>
>>> thank you for this. I realise that time is of the essence, so will be
>>> short in my comments:
>>>
>>> 1. This is a formal follow-up Advice from the ALAC.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ​Maybe this is hair-splitting, but it is more as background to existing
>>> advice -- caused by the Board's need for more information -- rather than
>>> new independent Advice.
>>>
>>> ALAC has long had to deal with different classifications of what it votes
>>> on. As this document itself contains no recommended courses of action
>>> itself, I would not call it Advice.​
>>>
>>>
>>> As such, when
>>> mentioning names etc. it should be better if a certain level of
>>> formality is upheld. When citing names, please cite the full name:
>>> "The heightened protection measures announced by Fadi, at the start of
>>> ICANN51"
>>> -> The heightened protection measures announced by ICANN President and
>>> CEO Fadi Chehadé, at the start of ICANN51"
>>> ​
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [...other generally-sensible edits ...]​
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ​Believe me, Olivier, given more time there is much that could have been
>>> refined, added, and maybe even taken out. Notably, more time would have
>>> enabled direct answers to the illogical Registry response that PICs can
>>> only be fixed through a PDP (as the PICs themselves were not created by a
>>> PDP).
>>>
>>> But doing even a usable statement able to actually be effective has been a
>>> fight ​against time, which is the reason the voting period is so
>>> compressed. Similarly, consultation with the gTLD WG was also compressed
>>> (and was not helped when the email thread started by my urgently asking the
>>> WG to review the original draft was hijacked for an unrelated purpose :-P ).
>>>
>>> The Board is **now** considering its response to our Advice from ICANN51.
>>> To say this "backgrounder" was done expediently is an understatement. In
>>> the time it would take to incorporate your edits (and others that would be
>>> considered), the document will have been rendered nearly useless by not
>>> getting to the Board in time. Your indulgence is appreciated.
>>>
>>> ​OTOH, if there is anything FACTUALLY (rather than stylistically) wrong
>>> with the doc, that needs addressing.​
>>>
>>>
>>> ​- Evan​
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Evan Leibovitch
>> Toronto Canada
>>
>> Em: evan at telly dot org
>> Sk: evanleibovitch
>> Tw: el56
>> _______________________________________________
>> ALAC mailing list
>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac>
>>
>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/>
>> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC) <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
More information about the ALAC
mailing list