[ALAC] [ALAC-Objections] First Community objections results and determinations being published by the ICC

[Evan Leibovitch]

I would note, from reading the letter from these applicants, that the
perceived flaws of the system are, in this case at least, working in favour
of the public interest.

Reading the letter, it seems that the applicants are taking to task (what
is in their opinion) an overly broad interpretation of the term
"community", and wish to dismiss the objections by belittling the
objectors' status. They go so far as to characterize two (IMO reasonable)
GAC early warnings as "outrageous".

If this is the way the Experts will be operating -- erring on the side of
public interest when AGB lacks clarity, and recognizing the more-absurd
constraints on ICANN's definition of "community" -- I'm OK with that.

- Evan




On 26 September 2013 10:45, Rinalia Abdul Rahim <
rinalia.abdulrahim at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks, Dev. This is exactly the kins of problem we don't want to have with
> the CPE by not having properly trained evaluators regarding "community".
> No reason why the NGPC can't understand why we are concerned after
> receiving this type of correspondence.
>
> Rinalia
>  On Sep 26, 2013 10:17 PM, "Dev Anand Teelucksingh" <devtee at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Letter to Cherine Chalaby, Fadi Chehade, Christine Willet (ICANN) from
> > Shweta Sahjwani (Radix Registry), Jay Westerdal (Fegistry, LLC.)
> > criticising ICC Panel's decisions regarding .gay, .architect, and .fly
> > (more with the latter two)
> >
> >
> >
> http://www.icann.org/en/news/correspondence/sahjwani-westerdal-to-chalaby-et-al-24sep13-en.pdf
> >
> >
> > Dev Anand
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 10/09/2013 17:38, Dev Anand Teelucksingh wrote:
> > >> - objection against .gay dismissed (8 page determination)
> > >> - objection against .architect is successful (60 page determination)
> > >> - objection against .fly dismissed (21 page determination)
> > > I am amazed about the variety of report lengths. 8 pages vs. 60 pages.
> > Wow!
> > >
> > > Olivier
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > ALAC-objections mailing list
> > > ALAC-objections at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-objections
> > _______________________________________________
> > ALAC-objections mailing list
> > ALAC-objections at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-objections
> >
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>



-- 
Evan Leibovitch
Toronto Canada

Em: evan at telly dot org
Sk: evanleibovitch
Tw: el56