[ALAC] [ALAC-Objections] First Community objections results and determinations being published by the ICC

Carlton Samuels carlton.samuels at gmail.com
Thu Sep 26 16:25:04 UTC 2013


I so too can emote to the concerns.

I participated in the process to determine objection standing chaired by
Dev. And as I went along and reflected I became increasingly uneasy as it
became achingly clear that our standing as surrogate was increasingly weak
since the definition of "community"  that I was relying on was demonstrably
uncertain subjected as it were to variations, patently irregular and, even
cockeyed.

The process might have been formulated but clearly a low hurdle to abuse
existed.  And, more than anything else, equity could not be guaranteed.
What you say? Yes, there is the law. But equity is the value to uphold in
these matters.

That was when I decided to withdraw and provide no further participation in
the objection process.

-Carlton


==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
*Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
=============================


On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Rinalia Abdul Rahim <
rinalia.abdulrahim at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks, Dev. This is exactly the kins of problem we don't want to have with
> the CPE by not having properly trained evaluators regarding "community".
> No reason why the NGPC can't understand why we are concerned after
> receiving this type of correspondence.
>
> Rinalia
>  On Sep 26, 2013 10:17 PM, "Dev Anand Teelucksingh" <devtee at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Letter to Cherine Chalaby, Fadi Chehade, Christine Willet (ICANN) from
> > Shweta Sahjwani (Radix Registry), Jay Westerdal (Fegistry, LLC.)
> > criticising ICC Panel's decisions regarding .gay, .architect, and .fly
> > (more with the latter two)
> >
> >
> >
> http://www.icann.org/en/news/correspondence/sahjwani-westerdal-to-chalaby-et-al-24sep13-en.pdf
> >
> >
> > Dev Anand
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 10/09/2013 17:38, Dev Anand Teelucksingh wrote:
> > >> - objection against .gay dismissed (8 page determination)
> > >> - objection against .architect is successful (60 page determination)
> > >> - objection against .fly dismissed (21 page determination)
> > > I am amazed about the variety of report lengths. 8 pages vs. 60 pages.
> > Wow!
> > >
> > > Olivier
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > ALAC-objections mailing list
> > > ALAC-objections at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-objections
> > _______________________________________________
> > ALAC-objections mailing list
> > ALAC-objections at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-objections
> >
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>



More information about the ALAC mailing list