[ALAC] RUSH: Statement on ccTLD/gTLD Delegation/Redelegation Consultation

[Evan Leibovitch]

Looks OK to me. But given how anything ICANN even suggests to the ccNSO
that isn't purely procedural (ie, the FOI) is met with
out-of-your-jurisdiction fury in response (see the lengthy response to a
single line of the R3 white paper as but one example), I really wonder
whether the ccTLD component of this (both the statement and the response)
is more than wishful thinking

- Evan


On 19 March 2013 15:02, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:

> Cheryl and I were asked to put together a statement in responce to the
> IANA ccTLG delegation/redelagation consultation (
> https://community.icann.org/**x/EgFlAg<https://community.icann.org/x/EgFlAg>)
> and the similar one for gTLDs (https://community.icann.org/**x/CgFlAg<https://community.icann.org/x/CgFlAg>
> ).
>
> Unfortunately, due to other commitments, it is just now that the statement
> is ready and can be found on the ccTLD consulation page (
> https://community.icann.org/**x/EgFlAg<https://community.icann.org/x/EgFlAg>
> ).
>
> The statement must be submitted by the end of Wednesday, so I am guessing
> that it will be submitted just prior to a vote beginning. Therefore it is
> essential that any comments on this statement be submitted very quickly.
>
> I am also attaching a copy of the proposed statement for your convenience.
>
> I will leave it to Olivier to decide on the exact process to be followed.
>
> Alan
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>



-- 
Evan Leibovitch
Toronto Canada

Em: evan at telly dot org
Sk: evanleibovitch
Tw: el56