[ALAC] RUSH: Statement on ccTLD/gTLD Delegation/Redelegation Consultation

[Oksana Prykhodko]

Dear all,

I just submitted my comment on the wiki, but I would like to copy it
here - with some explanations.

"In my opinion, "accountability and transparency of the involvement of
the ‘Local Internet Community” and  ‘Significantly Interested
Parties’" mean also consultation with ALSes, which represent
"interested or affected" local Internet community. It means that each
such ALS has to receive direct e-mail from ICANN At-Large Staff with
information, that IANA received any request for redelegation. In case,
if ANY of such ALSes will object to such redelegation, this objection
has to be considered on the level of corresponding RALO and the result
of this consideration has to be reported to ALAC. In case if ALAC will
find such objections reasonable, the decision of ALAC has to be
submitted to the Board."

Explanations: I would like to clarify the role, the rights and
responsibilities of each ALS in any issue, which is "interesting or
affecting for local community". In case of redelegation of ccTLD or
delegation of new IDNS ccTLD it's easy to find such ALSes. In case of
new gTLD it would be necessary to relay on dashboard, on which
Capacity Building WG is working just now. That is why it is necessary
to register the sphere of primary interests of each ALS in this
dashboard.

Best regards,
Oksana



2013/3/19 Evan Leibovitch <evan at telly.org>:
> Looks OK to me. But given how anything ICANN even suggests to the ccNSO
> that isn't purely procedural (ie, the FOI) is met with
> out-of-your-jurisdiction fury in response (see the lengthy response to a
> single line of the R3 white paper as but one example), I really wonder
> whether the ccTLD component of this (both the statement and the response)
> is more than wishful thinking
>
> - Evan
>
>
> On 19 March 2013 15:02, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:
>
>> Cheryl and I were asked to put together a statement in responce to the
>> IANA ccTLG delegation/redelagation consultation (
>> https://community.icann.org/**x/EgFlAg<https://community.icann.org/x/EgFlAg>)
>> and the similar one for gTLDs (https://community.icann.org/**x/CgFlAg<https://community.icann.org/x/CgFlAg>
>> ).
>>
>> Unfortunately, due to other commitments, it is just now that the statement
>> is ready and can be found on the ccTLD consulation page (
>> https://community.icann.org/**x/EgFlAg<https://community.icann.org/x/EgFlAg>
>> ).
>>
>> The statement must be submitted by the end of Wednesday, so I am guessing
>> that it will be submitted just prior to a vote beginning. Therefore it is
>> essential that any comments on this statement be submitted very quickly.
>>
>> I am also attaching a copy of the proposed statement for your convenience.
>>
>> I will leave it to Olivier to decide on the exact process to be followed.
>>
>> Alan
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ALAC mailing list
>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>
>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>> ALAC Working Wiki:
>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Evan Leibovitch
> Toronto Canada
>
> Em: evan at telly dot org
> Sk: evanleibovitch
> Tw: el56
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)