[NA-Discuss] Proxy-Privacy Use Higher for Illicit Domains
avri at ella.com
Fri Mar 11 01:26:40 UTC 2011
I mean the comment made in the email.
On 10 Mar 2011, at 17:11, Avri Doria wrote:
> I was commenting on the comment made in the article.
> Where you bluntly say that a system I think that is run for my benefit is run for the benefit of criminals and spammers.
> On 10 Mar 2011, at 17:03, Garth Bruen at Knujon.com wrote:
>> I'd like to point out this sentence: "the illicit use of privacy-proxy erodes the legitimate use." I support the use of privacy services for proper reasons. The way it is structured now benefits the abusers and will likely cause lawful users to suffer later. I like the Canadian system (.CA) that prohibits the use for commercial entities, that would preclude much misuse.
>> Your assumptions about my intent are not supported by the content of the article, it is I who have been painted by a broad brush.
>> From: "Avri Doria" <avri at ella.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 5:17 PM
>> To: "NARALO Discussion List" <na-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>> Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] Proxy-Privacy Use Higher for Illicit Domains
>>> On 10 Mar 2011, at 09:23, Garth Bruen at Knujon.com wrote:
>>>> One of the controversial sub-issues is privacy-proxy domain registrations
>>>> which allow a registrant to replace their WHOIS details with the contact
>>>> information a of privacy shield company. The privacy-proxy business is a
>>>> nebulous world with no standards and little accountability. Supporters claim
>>>> it protects victims and political activists from attacks and private
>>>> citizens from getting spammed or scammed. Critics, like me, contend it is a
>>>> loose system run on behalf of criminals and spammers.
>>> i am now a spammer and a criminal.
>>> your brush strokes are a tad bit broad.
>>> NA-Discuss mailing list
>>> NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>> Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
More information about the NA-Discuss