[NA-Discuss] Proxy-Privacy Use Higher for Illicit Domains
avri at ella.com
Fri Mar 11 01:11:10 UTC 2011
I was commenting on the comment made in the article.
Where you bluntly say that a system I think that is run for my benefit is run for the benefit of criminals and spammers.
On 10 Mar 2011, at 17:03, Garth Bruen at Knujon.com wrote:
> I'd like to point out this sentence: "the illicit use of privacy-proxy erodes the legitimate use." I support the use of privacy services for proper reasons. The way it is structured now benefits the abusers and will likely cause lawful users to suffer later. I like the Canadian system (.CA) that prohibits the use for commercial entities, that would preclude much misuse.
> Your assumptions about my intent are not supported by the content of the article, it is I who have been painted by a broad brush.
> From: "Avri Doria" <avri at ella.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 5:17 PM
> To: "NARALO Discussion List" <na-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] Proxy-Privacy Use Higher for Illicit Domains
>> On 10 Mar 2011, at 09:23, Garth Bruen at Knujon.com wrote:
>>> One of the controversial sub-issues is privacy-proxy domain registrations
>>> which allow a registrant to replace their WHOIS details with the contact
>>> information a of privacy shield company. The privacy-proxy business is a
>>> nebulous world with no standards and little accountability. Supporters claim
>>> it protects victims and political activists from attacks and private
>>> citizens from getting spammed or scammed. Critics, like me, contend it is a
>>> loose system run on behalf of criminals and spammers.
>> i am now a spammer and a criminal.
>> your brush strokes are a tad bit broad.
>> NA-Discuss mailing list
>> NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
More information about the NA-Discuss