[lac-discuss-es] [lac-discuss-en] Tema CROP

Tue Mar 12 00:36:01 UTC 2024

[[-- Translated text (en -> es) --]]

Comparto los sentimientos de Alberto.

 Carlton Samuels.

 ===============================
 *Carlton A. Samuels*

 *Móvil: 876-818-1799Estrategia, proceso, gobernanza, evaluación y recuperación*
 ==============================

 El jueves 7 de marzo de 2024 a las 11:26,<alberto en soto.net.ar> escribió: 

> [[-- Translated text (es -> en) --]]
>
> Thank you very much for the response Harold. As I participated in the
> meetings at ICAN 79, I also heard several opinions against going to
> NetMundial+10.
>
>  Reading the conclusions of the first NetMundial, I do not understand
> those opinions, perhaps they did not read those conclusions. At a minimum,
> end users are included as part of the multi-stakeholder system. And during
> its development, topics are discussed that could have a favorable or
> negative impact on end users. And then those parties that attended can
> adopt those measures. And for end users who did not have representatives
> (with deep knowledge) it will be too late.
>
>  You always have to be proactive on this issue, we have lived it and
> suffered, but they continue to be only reactive.
>
>  Greetings
>
>
>
>  Alberto Soto
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  From: Harold Arcos<harold.arcos en gmail.com>
>  Sent on: Thursday, March 7, 2024 12:37
>  To: Alberto Soto<alberto en soto.net.ar>
>  CC: LACRALO Spanish<lac-discuss-es en atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>  Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] CROP topic
>
>
>
>  Good morning dear Alberto, I hope everything continues to flow well in
> your recovery.
>
>  Regarding your question about the approval by the Crop committee to go to
> an IGF meeting, I told you that they stopped approving the use of crop
> slots to attend the IGF after 2017 if I remember correctly. Then we went on
> to consider support to assist the IGF with resources that were specifically
> requested in the additional budget request (ABR) processes and then in
> 2018-2019 I remember that ALAC proposed the creation of a strategy that
> would allow Icann's presence in the IGF. One of the characteristics of this
> possible financing would be that the people interested in receiving support
> with additional resources would have Work Sessions or Presentations
> Approved by the MAG of the IGF or that they would be directing members of
> the ALAC working groups and at the same time be involved. in IGF work.
>
>  In general terms, these have been the cases in which the IGF issue has
> been discussed.
>
>  I take this opportunity to share with you, and with the region, the
> agenda that was discussed in the meeting with the ICANN board where the
> need for icann's presence in these international forums was raised again.
>
>  Before that meeting I also gave a report at the meeting with the regional
> vice presidents of Icann in which we had the opportunity to emphasize the
> importance of reactivating the participation of the large community in
> these forums.
>
>  The responses in that report that I gave and the response with the icann
> board were to coordinate preparations and establish positions but it was
> not directly specified about enabling travel quotas.
>
>  As always, thanks for your attention to the important topics,
>
>  We are in contact,
>
>  Greetings
>
>
>
>
>
>  QSent through my H device.
>  Sorry for the typos and brevity
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  Sent through my H device.
>  Sorry for the typos and brevity
>
>
>
>  Sun., Mar. 3 2024 14:48, <alberto en soto.net.ar <mailto:alberto en soto.net.ar>>
> wrote:
>
>  Dear Harold, I still have not had an answer to my last question on this
> topic. And precisely in the meeting at this moment at ICANN 79 they are
> talking about the importance of NetMundial+10, and there is a working group
> of which you are part. Opinions were also expressed about our convenient
> participation in that meeting.
>
>  Please, could you answer me?
>
>  Thank you so much
>
>
>
>  Alberto Soto
>
>
>
>  From: lac-discuss-es <lac-discuss-es-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> <mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org>> On behalf of
> alberto en soto.net.ar<mailto:alberto en soto.net.ar>
>  Sent on: Monday, February 12, 2024 22:03
>  To: 'Harold Arcos' <harold.arcos en gmail.com <mailto:harold.arcos en gmail.com
> >>
>  CC: 'LACRALO Spanish'<lac-discuss-es en atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>  Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] CROP topic
>
>
>
>  Hello Harold, Who determined that CROP cannot be used for large events,
> and where is such a rule?
>
>  Thank you so much
>
>  Albert
>
>
>
>  From: Harold Arcos <harold.arcos en gmail.com <mailto:harold.arcos en gmail.com
> >>
>  Sent on: Monday, February 12, 2024 7:25 p.m.
>  To: Alberto Soto Roldan <alberto en soto.net.ar <mailto:alberto en soto.net.ar
> >>
>  CC: LACRALO Spanish <lac-discuss-es en atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:
> lac-discuss-es en atlarge-lists.icann.org>>
>  Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] CROP topic
>
>
>
>  Hello Alberto, I hope the recovery continues with all the irons👍🏼
>
>
>
>  Thanks for suggesting, it is already provided for in the OFB information
> point and other matters.
>
>
>
>  I can tell you that for the World Net event something similar happens to
> the IGF, that is, it is not in the priority range to finance participation
> from the ICANN crop.
>
>
>
>  The crop focused on dissemination, strengthening and regional
> participation that could even attract more people to the ecosystem and in
> the case of these global events there is already a public fully involved in
> these ecosystems. As you know, the IGF and other global forums are no
> longer an activity in which we can use the crop a few years ago, we have to
> review that in the activity calendar.
>
>
>
>  We must check strategies for regional inclusion or reinforcement of the
> countries we have.
>
>
>
>  Let's talk more about this in the list and move between our monthly times
> because these strategy topics fall short when we try to build them only in
> the monthly meetings.
>
>
>
>  See you in a while at the meeting, today with the topic we were reviewing
> in the regional list👍🏼 RDRS
>
>
>
>  Greetings
>
>
>
>
>
>  Sent through my H device.
>  Sorry for the typos and brevity
>
>
>
>  On Monday, February 12 2024 16:35, Alberto Soto Roldan <
> alberto en soto.net.ar <mailto:alberto en soto.net.ar>> wrote:
>
>  Dear Harold, I request that you kindly add the CRP topic for today's
> meeting.
>
>  Thank you so much
>
>  Albert
> ________________________________
>
> lac-discuss-es mailing list
> lac-discuss-es en atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:
> lac-discuss-es en atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
>
> http://www.lacralo.org
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>
> _______________________________________________
> lac-discuss-en mailing list
> lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.