[lac-discuss-es] = iso-8859-1 Proceso_elecci q = F3n_ALAC_Member = ????
carlton.samuels en gmail.com
carlton.samuels en gmail.com
Mie Jul 29 22:31:10 UTC 2015
[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]
Asunto: Re: = iso-8859-1 Proceso_elecci q = F3n_ALAC_Member = ????
De: carlton.samuels en gmail.com
No, eso no importa. Nota lugar la terminología ahora
introducido; un '* percibida
conflicto de intereses*'.
Sé que las palabras comadreja cuando los veo, en Inglés o Español.
Así que ahora, uno se queda preguntar quién era el agente de esta percepción? Cómo fue
¿se desarrollo? ¿Y qué medidas se utilizaron para calificar la percepción?
Y teniendo en cuenta los hechos tal como los conocemos ahora, ¿qué medidas se emplearon para
desengañar a la 'percepción'?
-Carlton Samuels
==============================
Carlton Un Samuels
Móvil: 876-818-1799
* Estrategia, Planeación, Gobierno, Evaluación y plazos de entrega *
=============================
El Miércoles, 29 de julio 2015 a las 2:57 de la tarde, Jacqueline Morris <jam en jacquelinemorris.com
> wrote:
> Hi
> I think there's some confusion. We have had a couple of consensus polls,
> in 2008 it was an objection to a single nomination, as it is here.
> In the other cases, it was because the teleconference was not quorate, and
> the list is a quorum, so the consensus poll was done to ensure that the
> decision was quorate. These cases are different on the face, and so should
> not serve as precedent for this case.
> The only precedent to be considered should be the 2008 one.
> Sincerely
> Jacqueline Morris
>
> Jacqueline A. Morris
> Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and
> Free. (after Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> )
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 6:20 PM, <asoto en ibero-americano.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>>
>> Subject: = iso-8859-1 Proceso_elecci q = F3n_ALAC_Member =????
>> From: asoto en ibero-americano.org
>>
>>
>> Dear, this is part of the mail where porqudel process explicel
>> Voting:
>>
>>
>> Now I want to remind you that last year we were Humberto and I, mechanics
>> applicants. We should do votaciny accept the result. There were those who
>> voted no, others abstained and others voted yes.
>>
>>
>> The other case was particularly Natalia Enciso, unique candidate for ALAC
>> Member. And it was the case that we take as a precedent.
>>
>>
>> Mentioning the case of Sylvia Leite Herlen is not correct, we need
>> make choice for that position.
>>
>>
>> We pre-meeting with the staff and then taken the decision
>> Lance was advised that the ballot will be made, taking as a precedent
>> the case
>> Natalia Enciso.
>>
>>
>> ARE ongoing process and finalizarcon the ballot.
>>
>>
>> This is the mail sent before the end of the votaciny on which
>> no prior knowledge recibiningn comment is the result:
>>
>>
>> Before the results of the current survey on whether or not
>> Lance Hinds should be confirmed as the ALAC Representative 2015-2017
>> LACRALO would like us to establish the methodology to be utilizarpara
>> determine the results.
>>
>>
>> Whether a majority (over 50%) of the respondents to the
>> survey, not counting abstentions indicated NO, then the process
>> of selection of the seat currently occupied by Ftima ALAC Cambronero
>> reiniciarcon a new call for applications.
>>
>>
>> Otherwise, the appointment of Lance Hinds is confirmed as LACRALO
>> ALAC member for 2015-2017.
>>
>>
>> Remember that each RALO ALAC should choose its Member; thus
>> we have made a choice according explained, taking three background
>> Similar and applications for several members that were conducted in the
>> meeting in Buenos Aires, who felt that the process was
>> incomplete.
>>
>>
>> In the interest of transparency, we reported before the result of the
>> Voting next steps.
>>
>>
>> In this regard we believe that it has complied with the report and why
>> It corresponds to open a new period of postulacin, presentaciny ballot.
>>
>>
>> It is worth remembering that there are many situations that do not
>> expressly estn
>> regulated as quisiramos. We must adopt a position basndonos
>> in the rules and precedents that have. When there is a situation
>> expressly regulated, we must choose one of the alternatives, reporting
>> prior to the community.
>>
>>
>> This is rational only solution we have found to solve this
>> such drawbacks.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> best regards
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Alberto Soto
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Avast antivirus software has analyzed this e-mail for viruses.
>> http://www.avast.com
>>
>>
>>
[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/c181ca6f90.html
--]]
Más información sobre la lista de distribución lac-discuss-es