[WHOIS-WG] [At-Large] Thick Whois
Michele Neylon :: Blacknight
michele at blacknight.com
Tue Jan 15 21:54:47 UTC 2013
Carlton
You might know it, but a LOT of the arguments / debate etc., seem to ignore this
Regards
Michele
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
http://www.blacknight.com/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://mneylon.tel/
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
Locall: 1850 929 929
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Fax. +353 (0) 1 4811 763
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845
________________________________
From: Carlton Samuels [carlton.samuels at gmail.com]
Sent: 15 January 2013 21:50
To: Michele Neylon :: Blacknight
Cc: Holly Raiche; At-Large Worldwide; Whois-WG
Subject: Re: [WHOIS-WG] [At-Large] Thick Whois
Good catch Michele.
Not confusion on my part, just sloppy writing. I acknowledge and know well the WHOIS dataset is merely a subset of registrant data.
A missing word 'includes' is required to set it right: "We call lessees 'registrants' and that data collected 'includes' the WHOIS 'data set'".
- Carlton
==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
=============================
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight <michele at blacknight.com<mailto:michele at blacknight.com>> wrote:
Holly, Carlton et al
Reading over some of the comments from Holly and Carlton I think there's a small bit of potential confusion.
Whois data and registrant/ registration data seem to be used as if they were interchangeable - they're not.
Whois => gets displayed (at the moment)
Registrant / registration data => what's collected which may (or may not) be displayed
These two concepts or labels should be differentiated.
There are currently two gTLDs that respect EU privacy law.
One, .cat, relaunched their whois with the new policy last week, as was previously mentioned.
The other, .tel, has been running their whois with full respect for EU privacy law since they launched AND they've always had a policy to allow LEA gain access when required.
Regards
Michele
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
http://www.blacknight.com/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://mneylon.tel/
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072<tel:%2B353%20%280%29%2059%20%209183072>
Locall: 1850 929 929
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090<tel:%2B353%20%280%2959%209183090>
Fax. +353 (0) 1 4811 763<tel:%2B353%20%280%29%201%204811%20763>
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845
_______________________________________________
WHOIS-WG mailing list
WHOIS-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:WHOIS-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/whois-wg
WHOIS WG Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Whois+Policy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/whois-wg/attachments/20130115/21e5805d/attachment.html
More information about the WHOIS-WG
mailing list