[NA-Discuss] FW: [New gTLD RG] PICs posted by applicants "dot Health Limited" and "DotHealth, LLC"

Garth Bruen gbruen at knujon.com
Wed Mar 6 18:55:25 UTC 2013


Well said


-----Original Message-----
From: na-discuss-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
[mailto:na-discuss-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Wednesday, March 6, 2013 1:53 PM
To: NARALO Discussion List
Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] FW: [New gTLD RG] PICs posted by applicants "dot
Health Limited" and "DotHealth, LLC"

Hi,

Not sure how anyone could have submitted a PIC much earlier, they were just
invented.

As I said, the main reason for NOT supporting the objections is that there
is NO Community here making a claim to protection.

This seems to be the result of one bitter past applicant (with every right
to be bitter) that did not apply this time and a few small organization that
do not claim Community status.  I do not see how anyone could decide this
merited Community protection.  Other sensitivities, perhaps, but Community -
way too much of a stretch for this particular word or Objection.

avri



On 6 Mar 2013, at 13:41, Evan Leibovitch wrote:

> Submitting PICs at this late date gives us insufficient time to evaluate.
And the timing suggests that they were done specifically to placate us, only
once a threat of an ALAC objection became real.
> 
> If/when these objections get advanced to the ALAC, I may reconsider my
support for them when it's time for me to vote. But for now I encourage
NARALO to support the advancement of the objections, at least to the next
stage.
> 
> - Evan (via mobile)
> 
> On 2013-03-06 2:01 PM, "Avri Doria" <avri at ella.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Indeed since writing my note, I see that 3/4 are listed as submitting
PICs.  None had been when I checked just before writing.
> 
> This does not change my recommendation against the Objection, but it does
indicate that they may have a leg to stand on in the discussions with the
GAC.
> 
> Thanks for pointing out the change
> 
> avri
> 
> 
> On 6 Mar 2013, at 12:42, Garth Bruen wrote:
> 
> > FYI, DotHealth has submitted a PIC
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: newgtldrg-bounces at icann.org 
> > [mailto:newgtldrg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Dev Anand 
> > Teelucksingh
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 6, 2013 12:38 PM
> > To: New gTLD Review Group
> > Cc: ICANN GTLD WG list
> > Subject: [New gTLD RG] PICs posted by applicants "dot Health 
> > Limited" and "DotHealth, LLC"
> >
> > Updated the wiki pages with links to PIC from "dot Health Limited"
> > applicant as posted on ICANN's website 
> > https://community.icann.org/x/xYxwAg
> >
> > and link to PIC from applicant "DotHealth, LLC" as sent to the gTLD RG.
> > https://community.icann.org/x/t4xwAg
> >
> >
> > Dev Anand Teelucksingh
> > _______________________________________________
> > Newgtldrg mailing list
> > Newgtldrg at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/newgtldrg
> >
> > ------
> > NA-Discuss mailing list
> > NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
> >
> > Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
> > ------
> >
> 
> 
> ------
> NA-Discuss mailing list
> NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
> 
> Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
> ------


------
NA-Discuss mailing list
NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss

Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
------




More information about the NA-Discuss mailing list