[NA-Discuss] Fwd: In response to Eric Brunner Williams' Comments (http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/na-discuss/2013-March/002351.html)
Dev Anand Teelucksingh
devtee at gmail.com
Thu Mar 7 04:27:33 UTC 2013
FYI, as received - Dev Anand
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Andy Weissberg <andyw at dothealthgtld.com>
Date: Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:31 PM
Subject: Follow up Answers to EBW Questions
To: "devtee at gmail.com" <devtee at gmail.com>
In response to the questions raised by Eric Brunner Williams in this
1. Is the "previous, current and continued dialogue" with the ADG
within his or her official capacity within the World Health
Yes. This dialogue has been direct with the ADG who is officially
responsible for the WHOs resolutions for e-health and health-related
2. Is the representation that this dialogue was is not merely
informative and/or interrogatory?
This dialogue is and has been informative for both parties, although
in no respect should it be considered as being "interrogatory." We
assume that the ADG will respectfully share the WHOs official views
surrounding engagement between the parties.
3. Is the representation that "Executive Board Resolution 10.5"
relates specifically and directly to the DotHealth LLC application?
The EB Resolution is related to numerous issues pertaining to e-health
and health-related domain names, including and not limited to
applications for the .health TLD (see item #23, pg. 5). The resolution
and related follow up material are public record:
On a related note, and to eliminate any further confusion as a matter
of future comments, questions or assertions, please also inform Mr.
Brunner-Williams that the correct representation of my last name is
Weissberg, not "Weissman."
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Eric Brunner-Williams
<ebw at abenaki.wabanaki.net> wrote:
> On 3/6/13 11:50 AM, Dev Anand Teelucksingh wrote:
> A follow-up to the prior note from Mr. Weissman and relayed by Dev,
> not necessary to today's NARALO question, but relevant to the claims
> advanced prior to March 8th:
> Mr. Weissman writes, inter alia, that:
>> as well as in consideration of DotHealth's previous,
>> current and continued dialogue with the Assistant Director General of
>> the WHO regarding the .health TLD and the DotHealth, LLC application
> I've the following questions:
> 1. Is the "previous, current and continued dialogue" with the ADG
> within his or her official capacity within the World Health Organization?
> 2. Is the representation that this dialogue was is not merely
> informative and/or interrogatory?
> 3. Is the representation that "Executive Board Resolution 10.5"
> relates specifically and directly to the DotHealth LLC application?
> I've tried to phrase these as questions to which the likely answer is
> a simple "yes".
> I trust that competent answers will be forthcoming prior to the point
> in time when the ALAC considers the present objection and Mr.
> Weissman's counterclaims.
> Eric Brunner-Williams
> NA-Discuss mailing list
> NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
More information about the NA-Discuss