[lac-discuss-es] Vistaprint is abandoning .vista

[bzs en theworld.com]

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]


Tema:Re:    Vistaprint is abandoning .vista
De:bzs en theworld.com


Aunque tal vez esté implícito en una de las categorías que enumera, la encuentro
interesante que "permita a los titulares de marcas operar bajo sus
cadena de marca donde existen colisiones "no está en esta lista corta.

Si uno plantea ese problema, la mayoría de las personas entiende qué o por qué
podría ser importante, pero rara vez se discute más allá de eso.

¿Me pregunto porque?

¿Por qué el nombre de dominio está al mismo tiempo tan conectado a
marcas registradas tan desconectadas de la política explícita más allá de tal vez
TMCH (que funciona en contra de cualquier resolución), llega primero servido
(problema similar), y por supuesto URS y otra resolución de conflictos
mecanismos después del hecho?

Me parece que es el elefante (silencioso) en la habitación de estos
discusiones

El 12 de julio de 2018 a las 11:40 roberto_gaetano en hotmail.com (Roberto Gaetano) escribió:
 > I don’t want to open a big can of worms, but there are substantial differences between applications. Some are in view of having a financial return, some for the promotion of a brand, some for the support of a community, some just to widen the access to the internet for people using different languages and scripts…. I don’t think that the current “one size fits all” approach of $185K+$25K/year is appropriate, but I also think that changing the figures but keeping the approach will be of any help for the community as a whole.
 > R.
 > 
 > PS: I keep LACRALO in cc, but my message is likely to be rejected because I am not a member thereof
 > 
 >    
 > > On 12.07.2018, at 05:49, bzs en theworld.com wrote:   
 > >    
 > >    
 > > A major problem with nTLDs, including (and particularly) brand nTLDS,   
 > > is ICANN should have charged, and should going forward, millions for   
 > > them, not $185K+$25K/year.   
 > >    
 > > And if any were deserving but not financially capable they could be   
 > > handled on a case by case basis. It's not like it's difficult to give   
 > > something away so let's not bog ourselves down in that.   
 > >    
 > > I think $2.5M for a new gTLD and $5M for a brand TLD sounds pretty   
 > > reasonable, and $100K/$250K/year, maybe more.   
 > >    
 > > To quote a recent note here it's not much for a Fortune 500 company.   
 > >    
 > > --    
 > >        -Barry Shein   
 > > 
 > > Software Tool & Die    | bzs en TheWorld.com             | http://www.TheWorld.com
 > > Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD       | 800-THE-WRLD
 > > The World: Since 1989  | A Public Information Utility | *oo*
 > > _______________________________________________
 > > At-Large mailing list
 > > At-Large en atlarge-lists.icann.org
 > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
 > > 
 > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
 > 

-
-Barry Shein

Software Tool & Die | bzs en TheWorld.com |https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
Proveedores para el comercio | Voz: +1 617-STD-WRLD | 800-THE-WRLD
El mundo: desde 1989 | Una herramienta de información pública | * oo *
_______________________________________________
lac-discuss-en lista de correo
lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en

[[--Original text (en)
Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/95a278c31a.html
--]]