[lac-discuss-es] = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ????

Jue Jun 25 19:08:31 UTC 2015

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

 Asunto: Re: = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ???? 
 Desde: asoto en ibero-americano.org

 Estimado Alejandro, Apenas termine ICANN 53, nos pondremos con ESTO y Todo Lo Demás En que AÚN SE ESTA Trabajando. 

 Saludos cordiales 

 Alberto Soto 

 De: lac-discuss-es-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org] En nombre de Alejandro Pisanty 
 Enviado el: jueves, 25 de junio de 2015 24:35 
 Para: LACRALO 
 CC: lista de discusión de LACRALO 
 Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ???? 

 Hola, 

 creo Que Estamos en posicion de declarar ONU consensus Sobre Estós lineamientos Ayer Sergio y Otros me manifestaron verbalmente Apoyo a la Propuesta. 

 Alberto y Humberto, de verdad de verdad les pido instituir El Proceso Correspondiente. 

 Estafa Podemos Consenso Este: 

 1. EXPLORAR La Situacion reales de las Organizaciones pecado Iniciar Procesos Formales; 

 2. Cuales EXPLORAR Serian Las reglas Formales aplicables; 

 3. Ayudar Inmediato de una las Organizaciones que lo necesiten Más. 

 Saludos cordiales 

 Alejandro Pisanty 

 El Jue, 25 de junio 2015 a las 11:42 AM, <jam en jacquelinemorris.com <mailto:jam en jacquelinemorris.com> &gt; Escribió: 

 [[--Translated Texto (en -&gt; es) -]] 

 Asunto: Re: = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ???? 
 Desde: jam en jacquelinemorris.com <mailto:jam en jacquelinemorris.com>

 El diablo, es siempre, embargo de pecado, en los Detalles. 
 El 25 de junio 2015 10:28, &quot;Carlton Samuels&quot; <carlton.samuels en gmail.com <mailto:carlton.samuels en gmail.com> &gt; Escribio: 

> Yes, we are now in the ballpark.  I can support these for baseline.
>
> -Carlton
>
>
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799 <tel:876-818-1799>
> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
> =============================
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:57 AM, <apisanty en gmail.com <mailto:apisanty en gmail.com> > wrote:
>
>>
>> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>>
>>  Subject: = utf-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz =????
>>  From: apisanty en gmail.com <mailto:apisanty en gmail.com>
>>
>>  Colleagues,
>>
>>
>>  today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion
>>  on metrics.
>>
>>
>>  Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group,
>>  I think it is worth to make clear what the objective metrics. This
>>  It is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not
>>  They made by self-interest to distort the discussion.
>>
>>
>>  What we need we are accountability and transparency between us
>>  thereof. Individuals and organizations working activametne be
>>  identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute
>>  They involved to decide whether they will participate or no longer
>> counted. And there
>>  an intermediate strip of organizations and representatives who are
>>  difficult to participate but have the will to do so.Among these there
>>  Many types of situations: a representative who is sick or has to
>>  spend time with family or work that sustains; changing
>>  directive or mandate; and many more circumstances.
>>
>>
>>  A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, and
>>  difficult to counterfeit. Would make a &quot;triage&quot;, ie would
>> rather obvious
>>  5-10 which are regularly participating organizations and
>>  They contribute 20 which are practically abandoned, and a strip
>>  intermediate 10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that
>>  recover their participation or leave the organization voluntarily or
>>  by way of decertification. This assumes renewal cycles
>>  certifications, we must institute.
>>
>>
>>  There is a classification of units that can help us further
>>  in this process:
>>
>>
>>  1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities, and
>>  contribution to substantive policy issues.His proposals are
>>  LACRALO incorporated into resolutions and have impact on policy
>>  ALAC and ICANN.
>>
>>
>>  2. sporadic participation and / or devoted to procedural matters
>>  Reglaments, formats agreements but not their contents, etc.
>>
>>
>>  3. sporadic appearances, little focus, and fundamentally
>>  leading to &quot;make presence&quot; for elections and selection
>> processes
>>  for participation in events, especially if they involve support for
>>  travel.
>>
>>
>>  Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations
>>  should favor the type 1, type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who
>>  make appearances type 2 pass to level 1.
>>
>>
>>  If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working Group
>>  Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good
>>  implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable and
>> achievable.
>>
>>
>>  Is there any disagreement with these general principles?
>>
>>
>>  Alejandro Pisanty
>>
>>
>>  -
>>  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>      Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
>>  UNAM Faculty of Chemistry
>>  3000 University Avenue,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
>>  + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
>>  SMS FROM MEXICO +525541444475 +525541444475
>>  Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
>>  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
>>  UNAM Join the LinkedIn group,
>>  http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
>>  Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
>>  ---- &gt;&gt; Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
>>  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>>
>>
>>

[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/005ac6b985.html
--]]