[lac-discuss-es] = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ????

[jam en jacquelinemorris.com]

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

 Asunto: Re: = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ???? 
 Desde: jam at jacquelinemorris.com

 Y mi aceptación de "principios generales", aunque "principios rectores" 
 podría funcionar mejor. 
 El 25 de junio 2015 13:15, &quot;Carlton Samuels&quot; <carlton.samuels at gmail.com> escribió: 


> ..hence my deliberate use of the word 'baseline'.
>
> CAS
>
>
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
> =============================
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Jacqueline Morris <
> jam at jacquelinemorris.com> wrote:
>
>> The devil, is always, however, in the details.
>> On 25 Jun 2015 10:28, "Carlton Samuels" <carlton.samuels at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, we are now in the ballpark.  I can support these for baseline.
>>>
>>> -Carlton
>>>
>>>
>>> ==============================
>>> Carlton A Samuels
>>> Mobile: 876-818-1799
>>> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
>>> =============================
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:57 AM, <apisanty at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>>>>
>>>>  Subject: = utf-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz =????
>>>>  From: apisanty at gmail.com
>>>>
>>>>  Colleagues,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion
>>>>  on metrics.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group,
>>>>  I think it is worth to make clear what the objective metrics. This
>>>>  It is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not
>>>>  They made by self-interest to distort the discussion.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  What we need we are accountability and transparency between us
>>>>  thereof. Individuals and organizations working activametne be
>>>>  identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute
>>>>  They involved to decide whether they will participate or no longer
>>>> counted. And there
>>>>  an intermediate strip of organizations and representatives who are
>>>>  difficult to participate but have the will to do so.Among these there
>>>>  Many types of situations: a representative who is sick or has to
>>>>  spend time with family or work that sustains; changing
>>>>  directive or mandate; and many more circumstances.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, and
>>>>  difficult to counterfeit. Would make a &quot;triage&quot;, ie would
>>>> rather obvious
>>>>  5-10 which are regularly participating organizations and
>>>>  They contribute 20 which are practically abandoned, and a strip
>>>>  intermediate 10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that
>>>>  recover their participation or leave the organization voluntarily or
>>>>  by way of decertification. This assumes renewal cycles
>>>>  certifications, we must institute.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  There is a classification of units that can help us further
>>>>  in this process:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities, and
>>>>  contribution to substantive policy issues.His proposals are
>>>>  LACRALO incorporated into resolutions and have impact on policy
>>>>  ALAC and ICANN.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  2. sporadic participation and / or devoted to procedural matters
>>>>  Reglaments, formats agreements but not their contents, etc.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  3. sporadic appearances, little focus, and fundamentally
>>>>  leading to &quot;make presence&quot; for elections and selection
>>>> processes
>>>>  for participation in events, especially if they involve support for
>>>>  travel.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations
>>>>  should favor the type 1, type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who
>>>>  make appearances type 2 pass to level 1.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working Group
>>>>  Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good
>>>>  implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable and
>>>> achievable.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Is there any disagreement with these general principles?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Alejandro Pisanty
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  -
>>>>  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>>      Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
>>>>  UNAM Faculty of Chemistry
>>>>  3000 University Avenue,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
>>>>  + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
>>>>  SMS FROM MEXICO +525541444475 +525541444475
>>>>  Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
>>>>  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
>>>>  UNAM Join the LinkedIn group,
>>>>  http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
>>>>  Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
>>>>  ---- &gt;&gt; Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
>>>>  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>



[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/3e50f79172.html
--]]