[lac-discuss-es] = iso-8859-1 Proceso_elecci q = F3n_ALAC_Member = ????

[carlton.samuels en gmail.com]

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

 Asunto: Re: = iso-8859-1 Proceso_elecci q = F3n_ALAC_Member = ???? 
 De: carlton.samuels en gmail.com

 No, eso no importa. Nota lugar la terminología ahora 
 introducido; un '* percibida 
 conflicto de intereses*'. 


 Sé que las palabras comadreja cuando los veo, en Inglés o Español. 


 Así que ahora, uno se queda preguntar quién era el agente de esta percepción? Cómo fue 
 ¿se desarrollo? ¿Y qué medidas se utilizaron para calificar la percepción? 


 Y teniendo en cuenta los hechos tal como los conocemos ahora, ¿qué medidas se emplearon para 
 desengañar a la 'percepción'? 


 -Carlton Samuels 




 ============================== 
 Carlton Un Samuels 
 Móvil: 876-818-1799 
 * Estrategia, Planeación, Gobierno, Evaluación y plazos de entrega * 
 ============================= 


 El Miércoles, 29 de julio 2015 a las 2:57 de la tarde, Jacqueline Morris <jam en jacquelinemorris.com 
> wrote:
> Hi
> I think there's some confusion. We have had a couple of consensus polls,
> in 2008 it was an objection to a single nomination, as it is here.
> In the other cases, it was because the teleconference was not quorate, and
> the list is a quorum, so the consensus poll was done to ensure that the
> decision was quorate. These cases are different on the face, and so should
> not serve as precedent for this case.
> The only precedent to be considered should be the 2008 one.
> Sincerely
> Jacqueline Morris
>
> Jacqueline A. Morris
> Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and
> Free. (after Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> )
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 6:20 PM, <asoto en ibero-americano.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>>
>>  Subject: = iso-8859-1 Proceso_elecci q = F3n_ALAC_Member =????
>>  From: asoto en ibero-americano.org
>>
>>
>>  Dear, this is part of the mail where porqudel process explicel
>>  Voting:
>>
>>
>>  Now I want to remind you that last year we were Humberto and I, mechanics
>>  applicants. We should do votaciny accept the result. There were those who
>>  voted no, others abstained and others voted yes.
>>
>>
>>  The other case was particularly Natalia Enciso, unique candidate for ALAC
>>  Member. And it was the case that we take as a precedent.
>>
>>
>>  Mentioning the case of Sylvia Leite Herlen is not correct, we need
>>  make choice for that position.
>>
>>
>>  We pre-meeting with the staff and then taken the decision
>>  Lance was advised that the ballot will be made, taking as a precedent
>> the case
>>  Natalia Enciso.
>>
>>
>>  ARE ongoing process and finalizarcon the ballot.
>>
>>
>>  This is the mail sent before the end of the votaciny on which
>>  no prior knowledge recibiningn comment is the result:
>>
>>
>>  Before the results of the current survey on whether or not
>>  Lance Hinds should be confirmed as the ALAC Representative 2015-2017
>>  LACRALO would like us to establish the methodology to be utilizarpara
>>  determine the results.
>>
>>
>>  Whether a majority (over 50%) of the respondents to the
>>  survey, not counting abstentions indicated NO, then the process
>>  of selection of the seat currently occupied by Ftima ALAC Cambronero
>>  reiniciarcon a new call for applications.
>>
>>
>>  Otherwise, the appointment of Lance Hinds is confirmed as LACRALO
>>  ALAC member for 2015-2017.
>>
>>
>>  Remember that each RALO ALAC should choose its Member; thus
>>  we have made a choice according explained, taking three background
>>  Similar and applications for several members that were conducted in the
>>  meeting in Buenos Aires, who felt that the process was
>>  incomplete.
>>
>>
>>  In the interest of transparency, we reported before the result of the
>>  Voting next steps.
>>
>>
>>  In this regard we believe that it has complied with the report and why
>>  It corresponds to open a new period of postulacin, presentaciny ballot.
>>
>>
>>  It is worth remembering that there are many situations that do not
>> expressly estn
>>  regulated as quisiramos. We must adopt a position basndonos
>>  in the rules and precedents that have. When there is a situation
>>  expressly regulated, we must choose one of the alternatives, reporting
>>  prior to the community.
>>
>>
>>  This is rational only solution we have found to solve this
>>  such drawbacks.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  best regards
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  Alberto Soto
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  ---
>>  Avast antivirus software has analyzed this e-mail for viruses.
>>  http://www.avast.com
>>
>>
>>
 
  
 


[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/c181ca6f90.html
--]]