[lac-discuss-es] = iso-8859-1 Proceso_elecci q = F3n_ALAC_Member = ????
crg en isoc-cr.org
crg en isoc-cr.org
Mie Jul 29 21:53:50 UTC 2015
[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]
Asunto: Re: = iso-8859-1 Proceso_elecci q = F3n_ALAC_Member = ????
De: crg en isoc-cr.org
Gracias Jacqueline,
en beneficio de las generaciones futuras, deja para tener toda la historia bien documentada contra de las reglas y los acuerdos existentes en el momento de cada elección. Sería un ejercicio más útil en la discusión acerca de nuevas reglas si es necesario.
Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
_____________________
correo electrónico: crg en isoc-cr.org
Skype: carlos.raulg
+506 8837 7173 (cel)
+506 4000 2000 (casa)
+506 2290 3678 (fax)
_____________________
Apartado 1571-1000
San José, COSTA RICA
> On Jul 29, 2015, at 1:57 PM, Jacqueline Morris <jam en jacquelinemorris.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
> I think there's some confusion. We have had a couple of consensus polls, in 2008 it was an objection to a single nomination, as it is here.
> In the other cases, it was because the teleconference was not quorate, and the list is a quorum, so the consensus poll was done to ensure that the decision was quorate. These cases are different on the face, and so should not serve as precedent for this case.
> The only precedent to be considered should be the 2008 one.
> Sincerely
> Jacqueline Morris
>
> Jacqueline A. Morris
> Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and Free. (after Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> )
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 6:20 PM, <asoto en ibero-americano.org <mailto:asoto en ibero-americano.org>> wrote:
>
> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>
> Subject: = iso-8859-1 Proceso_elecci q = F3n_ALAC_Member =????
> From: asoto en ibero-americano.org <mailto:asoto en ibero-americano.org>
>
> Dear, this is part of the mail where porqudel process explicel
> Voting:
>
>
> Now I want to remind you that last year we were Humberto and I, mechanics
> applicants. We should do votaciny accept the result. There were those who
> voted no, others abstained and others voted yes.
>
>
> The other case was particularly Natalia Enciso, unique candidate for ALAC
> Member. And it was the case that we take as a precedent.
>
>
> Mentioning the case of Sylvia Leite Herlen is not correct, we need
> make choice for that position.
>
>
> We pre-meeting with the staff and then taken the decision
> Lance was advised that the ballot will be made, taking as a precedent the case
> Natalia Enciso.
>
>
> ARE ongoing process and finalizarcon the ballot.
>
>
> This is the mail sent before the end of the votaciny on which
> no prior knowledge recibiningn comment is the result:
>
>
> Before the results of the current survey on whether or not
> Lance Hinds should be confirmed as the ALAC Representative 2015-2017
> LACRALO would like us to establish the methodology to be utilizarpara
> determine the results.
>
>
> Whether a majority (over 50%) of the respondents to the
> survey, not counting abstentions indicated NO, then the process
> of selection of the seat currently occupied by Ftima ALAC Cambronero
> reiniciarcon a new call for applications.
>
>
> Otherwise, the appointment of Lance Hinds is confirmed as LACRALO
> ALAC member for 2015-2017.
>
>
> Remember that each RALO ALAC should choose its Member; thus
> we have made a choice according explained, taking three background
> Similar and applications for several members that were conducted in the
> meeting in Buenos Aires, who felt that the process was
> incomplete.
>
>
> In the interest of transparency, we reported before the result of the
> Voting next steps.
>
>
> In this regard we believe that it has complied with the report and why
> It corresponds to open a new period of postulacin, presentaciny ballot.
>
>
> It is worth remembering that there are many situations that do not expressly estn
> regulated as quisiramos. We must adopt a position basndonos
> in the rules and precedents that have. When there is a situation
> expressly regulated, we must choose one of the alternatives, reporting
> prior to the community.
>
>
> This is rational only solution we have found to solve this
> such drawbacks.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> best regards
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Alberto Soto
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> Avast antivirus software has analyzed this e-mail for viruses.
> http://www.avast.com <http://www.avast.com/>
>
>
>
[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/1a333e9d44.html
--]]
Más información sobre la lista de distribución lac-discuss-es