[lac-discuss-es] Resultados Electorales Comentarios

carlton.samuels en gmail.com carlton.samuels en gmail.com
Mie Mayo 2 23:43:39 UTC 2012


[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

 Asunto: Re: Resultados Electorales Comentarios 
 De: carlton.samuels en gmail.com

 Estimado José A.: 
 Veo un intento sincero para que sea equilibrada, pero lamentablemente aquí, lo haré 
 excepto yo. Sería bueno si su advertencia de no criticar es 
 compartida por todos. Pero la evidencia está en contra de usted. Y tal vez sería necesario 
 a intervenir más a menudo con esta lección. 


 Definitivamente malinterpretar mis palabras con respecto a la profesión de abogado. 
 Nada de lo que dijo "menospreciado" la profesión. Por el contrario, expresaron su preocupación 
 sobre la capacidad de * * un miembro en el contexto del profundo conocimiento 
 los procedimientos de que suele atribuirse a los miembros de la profesión jurídica. 


 La mía fue una respuesta directa a las publicaciones en el hilo de correo electrónico. * ** En mi 
 * opinión, la referencia a la elección no caso de San José mostró una 
 insuficiencia demostrable de que el escritor entender las reglas básicas de procedimiento. 
 Y a partir de la evidencia, no es el único en este sentido. 


 Sí, podría haber repetido el nombre del contribuyente, pero está ahí 
 ya.Tal vez yo podría haber dicho algo como que no contrataría a - o 
 recomendar la contratación - que arregle un billete de cruzar la calle! Pero que sería 
 descortés. Es una elección. 


 Por último, presidió las elecciones. Las normas que le ayuden a reconocer 
 todos los movimientos, así como el proponente de las mociones. Así que, usted sabe - 
 o debería saber! - La identidad del miembro que propuso llamar a 
 elecciones en SJO. Me atrevería a decir que no debería estar entre los confundidos. 


 He optado por utilizar "parlamentario" lenguaje de aquí. Debido a que todos GA 
 los asistentes que - o debería - por ahora sabemos los nombres de las personas que han puesto 
 relacionadas con las elecciones movimientos en SJO. 


 Sin embargo, si a su juicio se lleva la necesidad de una mayor claridad, es muy buena idea 
 ampliar mis comentarios y compartir el nombre del miembro. 


 Saludos cordiales, 
 - Carlton 


 ============================== 
 Carlton Samuels A 
 Móvil: 876-818-1799 
 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y plazos * 
 ============================= 




 On Wed, 2 de mayo de 2012 a las 5:35 pm, JosFrancisco Arce < 
 > josefranciscoarce en gmail.com escribió:


> Dear Carlton: with all due respect, I want to share my vision with you.
>
>
> There is a saying in English: 'Where ignorance is bliss, it is folly to be
> wise'.
>
> There is another one: "the law is too important to leave to lawyers".
>
> I do not know their equivalencies in Spanish and a word by word translation
> would be inadequate.  Our LACRALO machine translation will be crude, at
> best. Nevertheless, I shall not attempt one here.
>
> We have always known that there is a reservoir of ignorance of LACRALO
>
> rules. More to point, ignorance of how they apply is really acute. The sad
> fact is this ignorance is demonstrated by some of our colleagues who, by
> virtue of their profession, one would least expect.
>
>  I do not like “saying”, because is better speak or write directly, so in
> this way people can understand better what you are trying to say, even more
> if many of them do not speak English.
>
> I see your words as a disparagement of others or for some profession
> (there is a common mistake in people and
>
> that is to put forward a profession by the person), and that is not the
> vision that has to have a leader of the region, because we are all pairs,
> some people has more experience than others, some work more than others,
> some of them find it more difficult than others, and the Key is not to
> criticize, the key is to build cooperative and collaborative dialogues.
>
> We have to ask ourselves “What we did to be at this point?” What we did to
> fix it? What we plan to overcome the difficulties?
>
>
> Without any fear of contradiction I now make this declaration: Any  LACRALO
> election in San Jose would have been illegal for lack of proper notice.
>
> In my part of the world, notice is a pre-requisite for democratic
> elections. This is because they are processes, not just one event. Take any
> junta of the kind we witness time and again in the LAC region and I can
> demonstrate that even they know this.
>
>  Your part of the world is my part of the world too (we have only one
> world). And without fear I say that I share with you the meaning of
> democratic.
>
>
> I know for certain that our democratically-elected friend, Hugo, knows
> this. [To the chagrin of his opponents! :-)]
>
> Notice typically has three elements; time, duration and content. A
> violation of any element condemns the notice.
>
> The attempt to call an immediate LACRALO election at San Jose by invoking
> the full UNGA Rules as authority [and allowed under LACRALO rules!] would
> have also been in violation.
>
> Not only for the violation of the notice period. But the process by which
> the voting event would have been taken on the agenda would not have saved
> the day.  That would have had one effect, to add the matter to the agenda.
>  A notice period plus candidates are still necessary for the election.
>
> In addition to all that, the member on whose behalf the attempt to hasten
> the election is being executed  VOLUNTARILY withdrew HIS element of notice
> from the Agenda.
>
> In other words, the member, maybe unwittingly, fouled his own pool.  Those
> of us opposed to the barefaced violation of the rules would not have to do
> anything more.
>
>  Dear Carlton I would like to ask you to mention manes in your lines.
> Because your lines bring more confusion than clarification. We should speak
> clear, because this is not the right way to refer to someone. This is not
> the communication that I want for the region. A person could say anything,
> with name and surname, and if there is with respect there is nothing to say.
>
>
> So now, let's speak to the concerns for poor use of ICANN funds raised in
> this thread.  Here is a phrase that works here: 'La historia me absolvera'.
>
>  I do not share your opinion about the poor use of IANN funds. For me the
> all events were successful, but is only my personal view. And I remember
> your word in Skype chat of ALAC saying “after the fiasco” talking about the
> GA, be careful because we create what we say and you are part of that.  I
> read only negative word in your last email, I read many, but few with
> initiatives.
>
> Is not only important to know how to do something, but more important is
> know how to teach. To this I invite you all Carlos Aguirre, Carlton, Vanda,
> Alejandro, the region need your support, your experience.
>
>
> Most of you would probably not know but ever since 2006, there has been an
> enduring nucleus of opposition for ICANN travel support to the At-Large
> attending ICANN meetings.  This opposition is largely from North America,
> among persons associated with the placeholder ALAC the new RALO included
> structure replaced.
>
> The most corrosive criticism alleged that At-Large participants who
> received travel support for ICANN meetings were really tourists first.
> Their involvement in the At-Large agenda at the meetings was secondary.
>
> This criticism was leveled at the At-Large in general but to my mind,
> sharply directed at members from LAC and Africa.
>
> Several recorded observations placed members from LACRALO at the centre of
> these criticisms.  To be brutally frank, one of our members was the THE
> poster boy for this abuse.
>
>  I share your opinion regarding tourist and is one of my most important
> concern, and we have to work together to find the way to overcome this.
>
> Again, say names are the right way to express, and you give others the
> opportunity to replicate.
>
>
> I have, in good nature, endured severe personal criticism because I opposed
> any attempt to publicly censure those deemed guilty.  Some of my colleagues
> interpreted my opposition as protecting a certain LACRALO member - who
> shall remain nameless here.  More thoughtful others recognized it for what
> it was; defense of a principle rather than personalities.
>
> All that aside, this member has enjoyed my support for other At-large
> duties.  Yes, you guessed right.  This member actually solicited my support
> for other positions.  And yes, because of the larger strategic interests, I
> gave it.
>
> By now, some of you might have also guessed my loathing for hypocrisy and
> all its works. One is supposed to celebrate conversion, as it were, to 'the
> one true faith'.  At least, that is the Christian tradition.
>
> Count me as a reliable skeptic. Because to be frank, this latest conversion
> we witness is really over the top.  It is nothing more than a rancid
> example of enlightened self-interest.
>
> That is the word.
>
>
> I do not want you take this personally, because I do not support Jose
> Ovidio´s words. My commitment is with the region.
>
> My finally message is “be careful on what we say, because words are
> power”, begin to think as a group, that is the key for the growth of the
> region.
>
>
> Dear Carlton, I really appreciate your lines, because sharing our vision
> is the way to create the LACRALO that we all want.
>
> My admiration for your work
>
>
>
> Kind Regards
>
>
>
> José Arce.-
>
>
>
>
> 2012/5/2 Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels en gmail.com>
>
>>  Bro Carlos:
>> You are right on fact as well as strategy.  I cannot disagree with you
>> here.
>>
>> With the greatest respect and affection.
>>
>> - Carlton
>>
>> ==============================
>> Carlton A Samuels
>> Mobile: 876-818-1799
>> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
>> =============================
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:57 PM, carlos dionisio aguirre <
>> carlosaguirre62 en hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >  My Dear Bro. We have coincidence in almost 90% of your words. I know
>> what
>> > do you want to say, I feel and live like you in many things, And you
>> know
>> > that my position is the true that I believe,  more than some strategies
>> or
>> > diferences in the political positions.
>> > But when is needed to be clear, sometimes we must be rude. I think is
>> this
>> > in where our positions dont find coincidence. Your words were very
>> strong,
>> > but without names, and I felt that we needed names also in your words.
>> We
>> > need to start to say names. Because in a contrary case all in the region
>> > are involved, and many of them being not guilty for that.  It my humble
>> > thought.
>> >
>> > My permanent enormous affectionate
>> >
>> > Carlos Dionisio Aguirre
>> > NCA GNSO Council - ICANN
>> > former ALAC member by LACRALO
>> > Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios
>> > Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina -
>> > *54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423
>> > http://ar.ageiadensi.org
>> >
>> >
>> > > From: carlton.samuels en gmail.com
>> > > Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 13:12:21 -0500
>> > > To: lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> > > Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Election Results Comments
>> >
>> > >
>> > > There is a saying in English: 'Where ignorance is bliss, it is folly
>> to
>> > be
>> > > wise'.
>> > >
>> > > There is another one: "the law is too important to leave to lawyers".
>> > >
>> > > I do not know their equivalencies in Spanish and a word by word
>> > translation
>> > > would be inadequate. Our LACRALO machine translation will be crude, at
>> > > best. Nevertheless, I shall not attempt one here.
>> > >
>> > > We have always know that there is a reservoir of ignorance of LACRALO
>> > > rules. More to point, ignorance of how they apply is really acute. The
>> > sad
>> > > fact is this ignorance is demonstrated by some of our colleagues who,
>> by
>> > > virtue of their profession, one would least expect.
>> > >
>> > > Without any fear of contradiction I now make this declaration: Any
>> > LACRALO
>> > > election in San Jose would have been illegal for lack of proper
>> notice.
>> > >
>> > > In my part of the world, notice is a pre-requisite for democratic
>> > > elections. This is because they are processes, not just one event.
>> Take
>> > any
>> > > junta of the kind we witness time and again in the LAC region and I
>> can
>> > > demonstrate that even they know this.
>> > >
>> > > I know for certain that our democratically-elected friend, Hugo, knows
>> > > this. [To the chagrin of his opponents! :-)]
>> > >
>> > > Notice typically has three elements; time, duration and content. A
>> > > violation of any element condemns the notice.
>> > >
>> > > The attempt to call an immediate LACRALO election at San Jose by
>> invoking
>> > > the full UNGA Rules as authority [and allowed under LACRALO rules!]
>> would
>> > > have also been in violation.
>> > >
>> > > Not only for the violation of the notice period. But the process by
>> which
>> > > the voting event would have been taken on the agenda would not have
>> saved
>> > > the day. That would have had one effect, to add the matter to the
>> agenda.
>> > > A notice period plus candidates are still necessary for the election.
>> > >
>> > > In addition to all that, the member on whose behalf the attempt to
>> hasten
>> > > the election is being executed VOLUNTARILY withdrew HIS element of
>> notice
>> > > from the Agenda.
>> > >
>> > > In other words, the member, maybe unwittingly, fouled his own pool.
>> Those
>> > > of us opposed to the barefaced violation of the rules would not have
>> to
>> > do
>> > > anything more.
>> > >
>> > > So now, let's speak to the concerns for poor use of ICANN funds
>> raised in
>> > > this thread. Here is a phrase that works here: 'La historia me
>> > absolvera'.
>> > >
>> > > Most of you would probably not know but ever since 2006, there has
>> been
>> > an
>> > > enduring nucleus of opposition for ICANN travel support to the
>> At-Large
>> > > attending ICANN meetings. This opposition is largely from North
>> America,
>> > > among persons associated with the placeholder ALAC the new RALO
>> included
>> > > structure replaced.
>> > >
>> > > The most corrosive criticism alleged that At-Large participants who
>> > > received travel support for ICANN meetings were really tourists first.
>> > > Their involvement in the At-Large agenda at the meetings was
>> secondary.
>> > >
>> > > This criticism was leveled at the At-Large in general but to my mind,
>> > > sharply directed at members from LAC and Africa.
>> > >
>> > > Several recorded observations placed members from LACRALO at the
>> centre
>> > of
>> > > these criticisms. To be brutally frank, one of our members was the THE
>> > > poster boy for this abuse.
>> > >
>> > > I have, in good nature, endured severe personal criticism because I
>> > opposed
>> > > any attempt to publicly censure those deemed guilty. Some of my
>> > colleagues
>> > > interpreted my opposition as protecting a certain LACRALO member - who
>> > > shall remain nameless here. More thoughtful others recognized it for
>> what
>> > > it was; defense of a principle rather than personalities.
>> > >
>> > > All that aside, this member has enjoyed my support for other At-large
>> > > duties. Yes, you guessed right. This member actually solicited my
>> support
>> > > for other positions. And yes, because of the larger strategic
>> interests,
>> > I
>> > > gave it.
>> > >
>> > > By now, some of you might have also guessed my loathing for hypocrisy
>> and
>> > > all its works. One is supposed to celebrate conversion, as it were, to
>> > 'the
>> > > one true faith'. At least, that is the Christian tradition.
>> > >
>> > > Count me as a reliable skeptic. Because to be frank, this latest
>> > conversion
>> > > we witness is really over the top. It is nothing more than a rancid
>> > > example of enlightened self-interest.
>> > >
>> > > That is the word.
>> > >
>> > > - Carlton Samuels
>> > >
>> > > ==============================
>> > > Carlton A Samuels
>> > > Mobile: 876-818-1799
>> > > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
>> >
>> > > =============================
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:18 PM, <cveraq en gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>> > > >
>> > > > Subject: Re: =? Windows-1252? Q? Resultados_de_la_Elecci = F3n_de_?
>> ==
>> > > > Windows-1252? Q? = 09L = 09a_Secretar = EDa_de_LACRALO_t =
>> > E9rmino_de_un_?
>> > > > == Windows-1252? Q? A = F1o_ = 09de_04_de_ = 09mayo_2012 ? =
>> > > > From: cveraq en gmail.com
>> > > >
>> > > > Incredible .. And those are the people demanding commitment and
>> demand
>> > ..
>> > > > # Prohibidoolvidar
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > While we are not transparent, conscious of our responsibilities and
>> > > > understand that not everything revolves around our personal
>> interests,
>> > the
>> > > > region will continue dependent.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Today we strongly believe in a good team without conditions.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Carlos Vera
>> > > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > > From: &quot;Alberto Soto&quot; <asoto en ibero-americano.org>
>> > > > Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 00:11:41
>> > > > To: <salgueiro.jo en gmail.com> ; <cveraq en gmail.com> ; 'LACRALO
>> Spanish'
>> > <
>> > > > lac-discuss-es en atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>> > > > Cc: <lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>> > > > Subject: RE: [lac-discuss-en] Results of the choice of l
>> > > > trmino LACRALO to secrete a year of 04
>> > > > May 2012
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > I agree with the view of the precious time lost in Costa Rica, in
>> > addition
>> > > > ICANN payment of money, just for personal interests that harm us
>> > > > all. A general assembly can not be lost completely only two
>> > > > people present. ICANN is a lot of money and OUR, and long
>> > > > staff of each of us invested.
>> > > > Best Regards
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Alberto Soto
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > > From: lac-discuss-es-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> > > > [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf
>> Of
>> > > > Jose
>> > > > Ovidio Salgueiro A.
>> > > > Posted on: Tuesday, May 1, 2012 11:09 pm
>> > > > To: cveraq en gmail.com; LACRALO Espaol
>> > > > CC: lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> > > > Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Results of the election of the
>> secrete of
>> > > > LACRALO trmino of one year from May 4, 2012
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Congratulations to Sylvia by Josy strong result.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > This leads me to think that the ridiculous we did in the Assembly in
>> > San
>> > > > Josfue unnecessary since this result was the same as hubiramos
>> > > > all obtained.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > The Caribbean was not able or San Josni now to put a candidate with
>> the
>> > > > capacity for a votacin important.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > I hope that now if you can work as expected in our organization
>> > > > and without the narrow interests that previously demonstrated
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > JosSalgueiro
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Sent from my BlackBerry Movistar
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > lac-discuss-en mailing list
>> > > lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> lac-discuss-en mailing list
>> lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ab. Arce, Jose Francisco
> + 54 9 351  6788920
>



[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/ad85c34511.html
--]]





Más información sobre la lista de distribución lac-discuss-es