[lac-discuss-es] =? Iso-8859-1? Q? RES = 3A_Propuestas_de_la_considera? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Ci = F3n? =
omar en kaminski.adv.br
omar en kaminski.adv.br
Mar Mar 6 15:00:52 UTC 2012
[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]
Asunto: Re: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? RES = 3A_Propuestas_de_la_considera? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Ci = F3n? =
De: omar en kaminski.adv.br
Estoy de acuerdo con usted, como se dijo antes, Jacqueline. Gracias por señalar esto.
En algún momento tendremos que hacer frente a la representación legitimidad x x
el tamaño del país x número de habitantes x la cultura del lenguaje x.
Omar
03/06/2012 Jacqueline Morris <jam en jacquelinemorris.com> :
> Hi Sylvia
>
> I have a feeling that there's yet again some misunderstanding...
>
> The proposal that I was commenting on is the one here: (PDF in English)
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/877052/LACRALO-Costa-Rica-Events-WG/bylaws/proposals%20to%20ensure%20diversity%20of%20lacralo%20alac%20officers%20and%20Individual%20participation.pdf
> .sent by Cntra last night.
>
> And the particular bit that I thought might lead to Brasil not being
> considered is quoted below:
>
> “Caribbean” means all countries in the Caribbean Region bounded by the Caribbean
> Sea, being not predominately Spanish-speaking and forming part of the Caribbean
> Community;
> “Latin America” means all countries belonging to the Latin American
> Region, being
> predominately Spanish-speaking and historically having long
> uninterrupted Spanish
> rule."
>
> And given that Brasil falls neither in the Caribbean Community, and
> cannot be considered Caribbean; nor is it predominantly Spanish
> speaking and having long uninterrupted Spanish rule, I don't see it
> fitting in the definition of LAC proposed here either, so my concern
> was - given these two definitions in Cintra's proposal, Brasil is to
> my mind indeed left out of this proposal. That was my question for
> explanation by Cintra as the drafter of those definitions.
>
> I totally believe that Brasil is a vital and important part of the LAC
> region and would like the definition amended to make sure that Brasil
> is also clearly included.
>
> I am writing this during a break in class, so cannot go into detail on
> the other points you raise, but I do strongly believe that individuals
> should be allowed to participate, but not necessarily in the manner
> proposed here.
>
> Jacqueline A. Morris
> Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and
> Free. (after Chris Lehmann )
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:25 AM, <sylvia en prontocl.com.br> wrote:
>>
>> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
>>
>> Subject: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? RES = 3A_Propuestas_de_la_considera? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Ci = F3n? =
>> From: sylvia en prontocl.com.br
>>
>> Dear J
>> You can stay calm as absolute Brazil ARE NOT EXCLUDED.
>> As is that ESTs dividing the region? For languages???
>> In addition to having 4 ALS, we believe and are part of
>> Latin American and Latino home that we are too.
>> We really must be having a serious problem of Translation An because
>> just what this group estproponiendo in its amendments is that all
>> their "officers" have 2 years in office and the possibility to re-choice. (
>> share with you the thought that 1 year is totally unproductive). And
>> again LACRALO agree with you that you can not pass all
>> years busy choosing their "officers" not really understand that in the
>> amendments sent??
>> THEN, urgent need that the secretary (and that is before
>> we all meet in CR) to send to the Official Trasnlation
>> proposal.
>> For your questions I see everything upside ESTs understanding!
>> Not talking in no time that "Individual participation". Everything
>> contrary to that!
>> It is our thought that all citizens of a country to participate
>> travs of an ALS.
>> I hope I have helped you understand a bit more.
>> Kisses
>> Sylvia
>> -------------------------------------------------- -
>> sylvia en internautabrasil.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Mensagem Original -----
>> From: lac-discuss-es-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces en atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome
>> jam en jacquelinemorris.com
>> Posted in: Tuesday, March 6, 2012 8:38
>> To: lac-discuss-es en atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> Cc: lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> Assunto: Re: Proposals for the consideracin
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> [[- Translated text (in -> en) -]]
>>
>>
>> Subject: Re: Proposals for the consideracin
>> From: jam en jacquelinemorris.com
>>
>>
>> Hello
>> Some comments:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The first thing you notice the definition of Latin America is that
>> Brazil esttotalmente excluded, being neither the Caribbean nor
>> Espaola speaking.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The idea of \u200b\u200balternating presidents and secretaras of the terms
>> an ao
>> harque continuity difficult. It takes more than a year to achieve
>> fully operational. The official exchange of all years,
>> basically,
>> LACRALO Administration has more personal and less dependent
>> effective.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> With regard to participation individually, I'm not sure how you will
>> work. It is each individual will count as a prior license to the
>> aggregate
>> counting them as no more than 50% of ALS in each country? So
>> if, for example, in a country with an ALS, and an individual user,
>> The individual has the same voting weight as ALS?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Only my first thoughts and questions.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jacqueline A.Morris
>> The technology should be like oxygen: ubiquitous, necessary, invisible and
>> Free. (AfterChris Lehmann)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, March 5, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Cintra Sooknanan
>> <cintra.sooknanan en gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> Please see motions for consideration which create and enshrine diversity
>>> and representation in our region at
>>>
>> % 20to% 20ensure% 20of% 20lacralo 20diversity%%% 20alac 20officers% 20and% 20Individu
>> a% 20participation.pdf
>>> .
>>>
>>> I also recognise the work of the By Law Working group and their draft
>>> amendments are located here
>>> https://community.icann.org/display/LACRALO/LACRALO+Bylaw+Working+Group
>>>
>> LO + Rules + of + Procedure +2010 + - + RULE +1
>>> .
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>>
>>> Cintra
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> lac-discuss-en mailing list
>>> lac-discuss-en en atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
[[--Original text (en)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/da8e208016.html
--]]
Más información sobre la lista de distribución lac-discuss-es