[lac-discuss-en] ??????? Q = iso-8859-1 FAblico_24 Cerraerdo_comentario_p = = = iso-8859-1 -MAR-17_de q =

asoto at ibero-americano.org asoto at ibero-americano.org
Fri Mar 24 16:09:43 UTC 2017


[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re:??????? Q = iso-8859-1 FAblico_24 Cerraerdo_comentario_p = = = iso-8859-1 -MAR-17_de q = 
 Desde: asoto at ibero-americano.org

 Well dear, envi the mail, and a response to be received 
 confirmed. All becomes clear that the view is placed on the submitted site 
 Web access without restriction n. 


 I suggest that those who do not have an involved, do so before 2300 UTC 
 Today through a mail to 
 comments-atlarge-review-draft-report-01feb17 at icann.org 
 One way is to support the view favored poured into the report of LACRALO, 
 and / or supporters poured into the ALAC response, or both at the same 
 mail. 
 It is very important your collaboration n. 


 Best regards 


 Alberto Soto


 ----- Original Message ----- an 
 From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of Alberto 
 copse 
 Posted on: Friday, March 24, 2017 11:08 a.m. 
 To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 Subject: [lac-discuss-en] Cerraerdo comment p PUBLIC 24 MAR 17 


 Dear Olivier, thank you again. LACRALO struggled to leave their 
 comment on these forms, and apparently there were several with the same 
 problem. Envi ended imagine Harold Ndolo mail. I also n I 
 using that to v. 
 I called the care that on an issue like this, this process is used: 
 fixed form (with problems) and mail. 
 And the p PUBLIC commenting does not have access to other comments, nor 
 made in the form or mailed is very rare .... 


 Best regards 


 Alberto Soto


 -----Original message----- 
 From: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of 
 ocl at gih.com Posted on: Thursday, March 23, 2017 7:38 a.m. 
 To: lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
 Subject: Re: Closed comment p PUBLIC 24-MAR-17 




 [[Translated text (in -> en) -]] 


 Subject: Re: Closed comment p PUBLIC 24-MAR-17 
 From: ocl at gih.com 


 Dear Alberto, 




 ALS and At-Large members are Alent to respond directly to the 
 consultation by electronic mail to: 
 comments-atlarge-review-draft-report-01feb17 at icann.org 




 L date limit for direct comments on March 24, 2017 23:59 GMT 




 But the ALAC and RALO leaders l n prepar also obtained comments 
 Consensus discussions. Drafts of these comments have been 
 And circulated.The comment THIN taken directly input all 
 particularly the work of the working group and can LACRALO RALOS 
 found here: 


 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DZLG-xM-WbyhI9LqAkS3pGZwvDjBI10h0xxYp5Ch 
 OPA / edit? Usp = sharing 




 The Declaration by ALAC \\ u200b \\ is elabor u200bcon several applications 
 entrance to the community and its last draft is attached. 




 I understand that now both states is frozen n - that is completed, 
 unless someone wing a factual error. 




 ALS are encouraged to support the ALAC and RALO statements, but 
 Tambi n are encouraged to comment directly at the email above, using 
 or not 
 using the template. 




 Best regards, 




 Olivier 








 On 23/03/2017 2:09, asoto at ibero-americano.org wrote: 
> Estimates, as everyone knows, on 24 March 2017, close the 
>  comments p venues around the reviewedSeptember n At-Large ITEMS by the
 > 
 > 
>  There were two papers entries, the first draft pages and ninety p 
>  then containing the recommendations is sixteen. 
>
>
>  The view favored this latter, it is obviously very limited without power 
>  review the first draft. 
>
>
>  Since the beginning many members of the WG, we made observations on 
>  that draft, which served to comment on the document 
>  contains recommendations is sixteen. 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  LACRALO har its inset n on these recommendations, according to what is 
>  They come off the WG, and were informed promptly to the list. 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  As recommended that each ALS or ALS pour each member of your 
>  OPINION n in the commentary p PUBLIC few minutes ago I tried. Actually 
>  Be prepared to personal comments on both documents. 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  My surprise when entering the link was that can only opinarse to a trav s
>  form the view favored only limited to comments, and restricted to a 
>  format for review comment for comment. 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  This means that the initial draft document, which I believe contains 
>  several shortcomings and misguided claims not directly investigated 
>  in fact, it is not feasible to be observed or can be poured VIEW n 
>  on it. 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  We must remember that ning n p PUBLIC comment was restricted to a 
>  form, and less an no possibility of opinion on the document 
>  He gave rise to that form. 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  Unfortunately it is too late, this PERIOD already closed.Try the way 
>  making a general comment, not particularly about each 
>  RECOMMENDATION No, because I think it is an important limitation n our 
>  freedom of opinion. 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  The link in question: 
>  <


>  lic-comment-input-template-01feb17-en.pdf> 
>


>  ic-comment-input-template-01feb17-en.pdf 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>




 http://www.gih.com/ocl.html 













[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/c9f26fc07c.html
--]]




More information about the lac-discuss-en mailing list