[lac-discuss-en] Public comment closes 24 MAR 17
antelizalexis at gmail.com
antelizalexis at gmail.com
Thu Mar 23 01:20:55 UTC 2017
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re: Public comment closes 24 MAR 17
Desde: antelizalexis at gmail.com
Thank you very much Alberto in ICANN58 I witnessed both times, I think is fair and
need to expand, improve and above all outline the role of both instances
users face. It is imperative plans, programs are known,
actions, results. That is, optimize mechanisms to ensure
effective and active participation of both instances. Which may well be
complementary and not necessarily mutually exclusive. Greetings Alexis Anteliz /
Fellowship
Estimates, as everyone knows, on 24 March 2017, close the
Public Comment At-Large Review by the company ITEMS.
There were two papers entries, the first draft and ninety pages
then it is containing the sixteen recommendations.
The opinion on the latter, it is obviously very limited without power
review the first draft.
Since the beginning many members of the WG, we made observations on
that draft, which served to comment on the document
It is containing the sixteen recommendations.
LACRALO will be inserted on these recommendations, as
They come off the WG, and were informed promptly to the list.
As recommended that each ALS or ALS pour each member of your
opinion public comment, I tried a few minutes ago. In
actually he had prepared personal comments on both documents.
My surprise when entering the link, which can only opinarse was through a
form "limited" opinion only comments, and restricted to a
format for review comment for comment.
This means that the initial draft document, which I believe contains
several shortcomings and misguided claims uninvestigated
directly in fact, it is not feasible and can be observed
pourable opinion on it.
We must remember that no public comment was restricted to a
form, let alone without the possibility of opinion on the document
He gave rise to that form.
Unfortunately too late, this period is already closed. I will try to form
making a general comment, not particularly about each
recommendation, because I think it is an important limitation to our
freedom of opinion.
The link in question:
< https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge-review-draft-report-public-comment-input-template-01feb17-en.pdf>
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge-
review-draft-report-public-comment-input-template-01feb17-en.pdf
Best regards
Alberto Soto
_______________________________________________
[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/c3c11c84e5.html
--]]
More information about the lac-discuss-en
mailing list