[lac-discuss-en] Public comment closes 24 MAR 17

[antelizalexis at gmail.com]

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]

 Subject: Re: Public comment closes 24 MAR 17 
 Desde: antelizalexis at gmail.com

 Thank you very much Alberto in ICANN58 I witnessed both times, I think is fair and 
 need to expand, improve and above all outline the role of both instances 
 users face. It is imperative plans, programs are known, 
 actions, results. That is, optimize mechanisms to ensure 
 effective and active participation of both instances. Which may well be 
 complementary and not necessarily mutually exclusive. Greetings Alexis Anteliz / 
 Fellowship 


 Estimates, as everyone knows, on 24 March 2017, close the 
 Public Comment At-Large Review by the company ITEMS. 


 There were two papers entries, the first draft and ninety pages 
 then it is containing the sixteen recommendations. 


 The opinion on the latter, it is obviously very limited without power 
 review the first draft.


 Since the beginning many members of the WG, we made observations on 
 that draft, which served to comment on the document 
 It is containing the sixteen recommendations. 






 LACRALO will be inserted on these recommendations, as 
 They come off the WG, and were informed promptly to the list. 






 As recommended that each ALS or ALS pour each member of your 
 opinion public comment, I tried a few minutes ago. In 
 actually he had prepared personal comments on both documents. 






 My surprise when entering the link, which can only opinarse was through a 
 form "limited" opinion only comments, and restricted to a 
 format for review comment for comment. 






 This means that the initial draft document, which I believe contains 
 several shortcomings and misguided claims uninvestigated 
 directly in fact, it is not feasible and can be observed 
 pourable opinion on it. 






 We must remember that no public comment was restricted to a 
 form, let alone without the possibility of opinion on the document 
 He gave rise to that form. 






 Unfortunately too late, this period is already closed. I will try to form 
 making a general comment, not particularly about each 
 recommendation, because I think it is an important limitation to our 
 freedom of opinion. 






 The link in question: 
 <  https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge-review-draft-report-public-comment-input-template-01feb17-en.pdf> 
 https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge- 
 review-draft-report-public-comment-input-template-01feb17-en.pdf 










 Best regards 






 Alberto Soto 


 _______________________________________________ 



[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/c3c11c84e5.html
--]]