[lac-discuss-en] closed public comment 24 MAR 17

[Alberto Soto]

Thanks Olivier!!

Kind regards

 

alberto

 

De: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond [mailto:ocl at gih.com] 
Enviado el: Thursday, March 23, 2017 7:38 AM
Para: lac-discuss-en at atlarge-lists.icann.org; asoto at ibero-americano.org
Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-en] closed public comment 24 MAR 17

 

Dear Alberto,

ALSes and At-Large members are encouraged to respond directly to the
consultation by emailing:
comments-atlarge-review-draft-report-01feb17 at icann.org
<mailto:comments-atlarge-review-draft-report-01feb17 at icann.org> 

The deadline for direct comments is 24 March 2017 23:59 UTC

But the ALAC and the RALO leaders have also prepared comments obtained from
consensus discussions. The drafts of these comments have been circulated
already. The RALO comment has taken input directly from all RALOs including
the work of the LACRALO working group and can be found here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DZLG-xM-WbyhI9LqAkS3pGZwvDjBI10h0xxYp5Ch
OPA/edit?usp=sharing

The ALAC Statement was drafted with several requests of input from the
community and its latest draft is attached.

I understand that now both Statements are frozen - i.e. finalised, except if
someone points out a factual error.

ALSes are encouraged to support the ALAC and the RALO Statements, but are
also encouraged to comment directly at the email above, using or not using
the template.

Kindest regards,

Olivier



On 23/03/2017 02:09, asoto at ibero-americano.org
<mailto:asoto at ibero-americano.org>  wrote:

Estimates, as everyone knows, on 24 March 2017, close the 
 comments p venues around the reviewedSeptember n At-Large ITEMS by the
company. 
 
 
 There were two papers entries, the first draft pages and ninety p 
 then containing the recommendations is sixteen. 
 
 
 The view favored this latter, it is obviously very limited without power 
 review the first draft. 
 
 
 Since the beginning many members of the WG, we made observations on 
 that draft, which served to comment on the document 
 contains recommendations is sixteen. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 LACRALO har its inset n on these recommendations, according to what is 
 They come off the WG, and were informed promptly to the list. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 As recommended that each ALS or ALS pour each member of your 
 OPINION n in the commentary p PUBLIC few minutes ago I tried. Actually 
 Be prepared to personal comments on both documents. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 My surprise when entering the link was that can only opinarse to a trav s 
 form the view favored only limited to comments, and restricted to a 
 format for review comment for comment. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 This means that the initial draft document, which I believe contains 
 several shortcomings and misguided claims not directly investigated 
 in fact, it is not feasible to be observed or can be poured VIEW n 
 on it. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 We must remember that ning n p PUBLIC comment was restricted to a 
 form, and less an no possibility of opinion on the document 
 He gave rise to that form. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Unfortunately it is too late, this PERIOD already closed.Try the way 
 making a general comment, not particularly about each 
 RECOMMENDATION No, because I think it is an important limitation n our 
 freedom of opinion. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 The link in question: 
 &lt;
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge-review-draft-report-pub 
 lic-comment-input-template-01feb17-en.pdf&gt; 
 
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge-review-draft-report-publ

 ic-comment-input-template-01feb17-en.pdf 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 





-- 
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/lac-discuss-en/attachments/20170323/d6534225/attachment-0001.html>